AlchoPwn
Public Service is my Motto.
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2017
- Messages
- 2,527
A McSasquatch I suspect.
Can I get mine without the pickles plz?
A McSasquatch I suspect.
Can I get mine without the pickles plz?
I'm guessing the McSasquatch comes with loads of cheese.i'll have your pickles then. I hate it when people just cast the pickle aside.
Sasquatch’n –
11am January 30
We’ve all heard the Sasquatch stories, but is there more to know? This documentary digs deep into the Indigenous experience to uncover surprising little-known sightings and spiritual messages that might change what you thought you knew about Sasquatch.
The state of Washington may get Sasquatch license plates for cars.
http://www.heraldnet.com/news/sasquatch-may-soon-be-spotted-on-state-license-plates/
Paul Gosselin, 57, Abair Road Bigfoot Eyewitness Dies
Paul R. Gosselin, 57, of Troy, New York, died on Saturday, May 16, 2015, at St. Mary’s Hospital with his wife, Rhonda, by his side. Paul was the main eyewitness, as a teenager, during what would become known as the famed Abair Road sighting of August 1976. In recent years, due to his own encounter, Gosselin grew more and more interested in Bigfoot, and became a member of the local Troy-Albany, New York group, the Northern Sasquatch Research Center.
She requested that suit be pulled and so it was dismissed. It was really poorly written (i.e., incredibly stupid and won't fly in court) so she took it back to have it done by a real lawyer (as if that will make it better). https://www.sbsun.com/2018/03/20/ca...t-is-real-lawsuit-has-been-dismissed-for-now/How come there are two Sasquatch threads currently in use?
Anyway, this lady is going to prove Bigfoot exists in a court of law, goddammit!
https://gizmodo.com/the-bigfoot-lawsuit-against-california-actually-makes-s-1823082037
It threatened her kids! So it must pay!
Needs more alliteration.Some scientists support sasquatch.
How come there are two Sasquatch threads currently in use?
Anyway, this lady is going to prove Bigfoot exists in a court of law, goddammit!
https://gizmodo.com/the-bigfoot-lawsuit-against-california-actually-makes-s-1823082037
It threatened her kids! So it must pay!
Sounds a bit like species profiling...
If you read the post before mine, you will see that I was simply putting it into context. Lordmongrove said:Needs more alliteration.
I said:Scientists support sasquatch.
Some scientists support sasquatch.
She requested that suit be pulled and so it was dismissed. It was really poorly written (i.e., incredibly stupid and won't fly in court) so she took it back to have it done by a real lawyer (as if that will make it better). https://www.sbsun.com/2018/03/20/ca...t-is-real-lawsuit-has-been-dismissed-for-now/
Thanks for the update. The case reminds me of those people who try to win compensation for unwittingly moving into a house with a poltergeist in it - they haven't a snowball's chance in hell of getting what they want legally.
Very interesting points about primates. In particuular the mental reflexes and short term memory in apes. All relevant to sasquatch.
It is so blurry as to be useless as evidence, why go to all the trouble off putting out cameras and taking hours to view the footage when the picture quality is so bad?
In general, in a court of law, cases are mostly circumstantial with one or two pieces of objective evidence (so fingerprints, DNA, murder weapon found on suspect) to drastically reduce the odds of the circumstantial evidence being just coincidental.Right. When was there ever an occasion where the court decided an animal was real? That's just not how this works. It does remind me of the commonly used trope that evidence for Bigfoot, etc. would be enough in a court of law. The rules of scientific knowledge just aren't comparable to that.