eburacum
Papo-furado
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2005
- Messages
- 5,774
NOTE:
This thread was established to contain a discussion that originated on this earlier thread:
https://forums.forteana.org/index.php?threads/tim-goods-source-for-the-original-mj-12-papers.65785/
... and which was tangential to that earlier thread's topical focus.
The psychosocial hypothesis explains all these 'antiphysical' aspects far better, and is consistent with the complete lack of any testable physical evidence for UFOs. If Vallee claims to be interested in the use of science in studying UFOs, he would have been better off studying the psychology of perception.
This thread was established to contain a discussion that originated on this earlier thread:
https://forums.forteana.org/index.php?threads/tim-goods-source-for-the-original-mj-12-papers.65785/
... and which was tangential to that earlier thread's topical focus.
I haven't heard any better theory. It's untestable in any simple way, but it's the only approach that takes into account all of the strange elements and antiphysical aspects of UFOs that the simple ETH ignores.
The psychosocial hypothesis explains all these 'antiphysical' aspects far better, and is consistent with the complete lack of any testable physical evidence for UFOs. If Vallee claims to be interested in the use of science in studying UFOs, he would have been better off studying the psychology of perception.
Last edited by a moderator: