dannycheveaux1
Devoted Cultist
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2003
- Messages
- 214
The muscle movement in the leg is really interesting
Perv!I can't believe I've just spent five minutes studying Bigfoot buttocks in closeup.
I can't believe I've just spent five minutes studying Bigfoot buttocks in closeup.
Maybe he just has an awful lot to say, it's a shame he couldn't be accommodated. I'd have thought the JREF would jump at the chance of ripping him to shreds.
Have any/many researchers pursued the angle that Patterson orchestrated the hoax with a third, unknown party, and Gimlin was there unbeknownst to him, to provide a more reliable witness?
I haven't gone into it, but there's supposed to be a good number of people who knew Roger Patterson contemporaneously and thought him to be a conman/huckster, plus there's the pre-encounter agreement, at Patterson's insistence not to shoot the creature if they saw it. Quite an important ground rule to have down if you know your friend is going to turn up in a hairy suit.
Have any/many researchers pursued the angle that Patterson orchestrated the hoax with a third, unknown party, and Gimlin was there unbeknownst to him, to provide a more reliable witness?
I haven't gone into it, but there's supposed to be a good number of people who knew Roger Patterson contemporaneously and thought him to be a conman/huckster, plus there's the pre-encounter agreement, at Patterson's insistence not to shoot the creature if they saw it. Quite an important ground rule to have down if you know your friend is going to turn up in a hairy suit.
... Also, (I must have forgotten this), but who was the actor in the suit? You had Patterson and Gimlin so who was the other dude in the monkey suit?
Ultimately there are four possibilities:
- It was a hoax, and both Patterson and Gimlin were complicit (so Gimlin is lying.)
- It was a hoax, which Patterson arranged, and Gimlin was duped.
- It was a hoax, and both Patterson and Gimlin were duped.
- Or.. it wasn’t a hoax at all, and they filmed a genuine entity, the nature of which we don't know.
I could go to Wikipedia et al., but I find them untrustworthy, so I'll ask here where there seems to be more knowledge:
Is this all the film that was shot? If so, why? Or was there more, but its been lost?
AFAIK the 59 seconds of Patty were the last thing they filmed on the day. Nothing after that. That's of course if you believe their version of events.I meant all the footage shot on the day of the alleged encounter.
I know that footage gets lost over the course of time, what I'm thinking is - did they run into the forest and try to follow the creature? And if they did (and if not, they should have!), did they use their camera?
Sorry if these are kindergarten questions.
did they run into the forest and try to follow the creature? And if they did (and if not, they should have!), did they use their camera?
Sorry if these are kindergarten questions.
Sadly, Googling "hot bigfoot action" would probably bring something up these days.Perv!