feinman
Account Retired
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2013
- Messages
- 2,761
Sorry to be a party pooper but I'm bored with these headlines now it's tiring running around in circles.Okay. This might be something big. Have to take a look at these later.
https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2020...-to-be-preparing-another-huge-ufo-revelation/
https://www.mysterywire.com/mysteries/secret-documents-released-on-joe-rogan-podcast/
For me and others, too, but it's even worse. It's like wanting to show friends a great scene in a movie we know about but the ads just keep on going and going and going literally for decades... Now and again there's an ad for the movie we came to see, but then back to more ads. That's one of the reasons that I keep trying to get away from UFOs now but seem to keep failing at stopping thinking about it. I think it is part of the plan really --boring the living hell out of folks is the best form of contact, frustrating as it is. We couldn't handle more exciting stuff or we would certainly start shooting at it, as in the past. It's not anything we can control anyway --if they want to show themselves in a more dramatic manner they will, we meat puppets aren't in control of it. But, there are relentless crops of new researchers and unprecedented things have been occurring with UFOs and the government --nothing like it has happened in the US for quite some time --since maybe the '40s. So more is certain to come out, but I want to leave the theater and go have a smoke cuz it is getting boring, but then there is a tantalizing preview ---and another ad.Sorry to be a party pooper but I'm bored with these headlines now it's tiring running around in circles.
And you can do one to pal.Harry Reid recently tweeted;
Senator Harry Reid
@SenatorReid
I have no knowledge—and I have never suggested—the federal government or any entity has unidentified flying objects or debris from other worlds. I have consistently said we must stick to science, not fairy tales about little green men.
10:07 PM · Jul 24, 2020
That's good. I do think the "little green men" line is old though: "They might be real, but I don't think they are little green men" (Obviously that's not how exploration is done) thing is just covering one's posterior for many, or to hedge bets if one hasn't seen them oneself. . We have been watching them for a long time and interacting with the devices long enough to know they are under intelligent control (that's why they are being considered a technology by a superpower that might have "leapfrogged" us; an absurd idea). I think this recent new transparency with the UFO studies might finally put matters to rest for some, if it is transparent enough. I'd like nothing better than to get beyond arguing if they are here to trying to figure out WHY they are here and WHERE they are from.. I do understand that science must work the way it does, and that's the only reason it is so valuable, so let's hope we can get some answers for everyone, this time. I'd add that just because Reid doesn't personally know of specific debris, others apparently do, including Elizondo. --no way to know if it is just more slag and BS or real stuff without making samples public, so like you, I am tired of hearing about it all of the time. I find it interesting that the qualities attributed to alien materials seem to predict or parallel cutting-edge technologies for space exploration we are developing; soft robotics, morphing tech, etc.Harry Reid recently tweeted;
Senator Harry Reid
@SenatorReid
I have no knowledge—and I have never suggested—the federal government or any entity has unidentified flying objects or debris from other worlds. I have consistently said we must stick to science, not fairy tales about little green men.
10:07 PM · Jul 24, 2020
https://www.popularmechanics.com/mi...3777/pentagon-ufo-program-materials-vehicles/Update 7/25: We've updated this story to include official comments provided by the Pentagon to Popular Mechanics.
For years, the U.S. government has repeatedly changed its tune regarding its official involvement with UFO research.
As recently as February, a Pentagon spokesperson told Popular Mechanics that, while a government program did investigate unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and other unexplained aerial phenomena for some time last decade, funding dried up in 2012. But when Popular Mechanics thoroughly investigated the covert program, multiple sources said it’s still ongoing to this day.
Popular Mechanics has just reported this story...
Pentagon Has ‘Off-World Vehicles Not Made on This Earth’
https://www.popularmechanics.com/mi...3777/pentagon-ufo-program-materials-vehicles/
Gary Voorhis was a computer technician on the USS Princeton during the 2004 “Tic-Tac” UFO incident (commonly referred to as the “Nimitz Incident” after the aircraft carrier heading the strike group.) Gary first saw “UFOs” as slow-moving radar targets on the ship’s SPY-1B radar, which he helped maintain. He also saw lights in the direction of those targets. Initially, the radar targets were thought to be radar clutter (false targets) but after a couple of days, planes were sent out to take a look. Gary saw some video from that “interrogation” and remembers a longer and more impressive video than the one that was later leaked to the public. He thinks what he saw was some kind of advanced technology, possibly alien technology.
I think a more likely explanation is some kind of series of radar glitch and unrelated visual observations of some sort – all possibly confused in memory by the passage of time. We discuss our different interpretations and try to figure out how to resolve them.