Analogue Boy
Bar 6
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2005
- Messages
- 13,521
Someone doesn’t want to be in the picture. Moves to the side. Doesn’t understand a wide field of view of a lens.
Someone doesn’t want to be in the picture. Moves to the side. Doesn’t understand a wide field of view of a lens.
Does the beardy man want more people on his tours? One of the irritating aspects of ghost-hunting to me as an observer not a participant is that there's so much use of vaguely possibly ghosts for PR purposes. Looks to me like a person trying to avoid the group and possibly not supposed to be there. Looks pretty solid.I wouldn't disagree with that assessment, but as the beardy man says in the interview, he has no idea who the guy is, which is unusual because the beardy man conducts tours of the place and you'd think he'd be able to identify the denizens of a location not too accessible to the public.
Reflection in the large glass window behind them? Pepper's Ghost illusion.Ghost Filmed at Gas Station in India?
Wait...so what the hell are "shadow people" then?!how many ghost reports have you heard of have them casting shadows?
Wait...so what the hell are "shadow people" then?!
What i dont get is are these people looking for ghosts? If they are they are really bad at it! Surely if they are actively looking for ghosts then they would be concentrating on what they are filming, the footage at 10:15 looks like a live action version of a FPS computer game being played by someone who hasnt got a clue what they are doing lolSo normally when there's video of some object unexpectedly moving in a ghost hunting video you get video quality that looks like a year 2000 cell phone camera with a resolution that could easily hide a string in plain sight. However the video below (at 10:15 if I didn't link directly to the time) shows what is a clear high resolution video. So my question is that presumably if you wanted to fake that, you could use something like fishing line since it's made to be both thin and low visibility, so how thin of a line would you need to not be visible in the video?
I have been on the Glasgow Central Tour, albeit about 3 or 4 years ago. They do make all members of the group were a hi viz vest and hard hat for safety reasons, but someone could always object.I don't see anything suggesting paranormality in the photo. The odd figure in the rear is wearing cold weather garb, just like everyone else. He / she is not wearing an orange cap, like multiple others in the group. My guess is that it's a straggler who wandered over to the side to check out the wall, or perhaps someone who couldn't see over the mass of young folks and moved to the side to see what was going on.
Thats certainly possible. When I did the tour a few years back Gary the guide did mention/was asked about ghosts and was very skeptical even dismissive of it in a humorous way. Times might have changed since and as ghost and paranormal tours are popular, he may be talking it up more.We only have beardy man's opinion that it was a ghost, and I suspect that's because it's good for business and that he really wants to believe in ghosts. Though the mystery of the non-ghost's identity remains.
Thats certainly possible. When I did the tour a few years back Gary the guide did mention/was asked about ghosts and was very skeptical even dismissive of it in a humorous way. Times might have changed since and as ghost and paranormal tours are popular, he may be talking it up more.
I was in Mary King’s Close once with a medium on a ghost hunt. We walk into a room and her comment was that “this room is full of spirits we had better leave”! Erm, that’s why we were there!Just watching tonights edition of 'paranormal caught on camera', what strikea me as odd, is the fact that the people on the shiw have gone to a 'haunted' building, with the purpose of filming paranormal activity, but as soon as something unexplained happens, they shit their pants and run away, surely they must expect and be prepared to see paranormal activity?
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/scotland-now/scots-psychic-snaps-ghost-girl-23484895
I can't see anything in the photo of the apparent ghost!
Jim Carrey, with beard?Anyone seen this article?
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/scotland-now/scots-psychic-snaps-ghost-girl-23484895
I can't see anything in the photo of the apparent ghost!
Amazing, despite the investigator’s choice of self-portrait simply screaming “serious researcher”:
I wasn't going to comment on that. But...Amazing, despite the investigator’s choice of self-portrait simply screaming “serious researcher”:
maximus otter
That's what researchers looks like these days, copies of Kendal Jenner and/or Kim Kardashian.I wasn't going to comment on that. But...
I wouldn't mind doing some serious research with her.Amazing, despite the investigator’s choice of self-portrait simply screaming “serious researcher”:
maximus otter
Or those ridiculous fake arses to look like the karsashian divorcèe to be hasI know we've been here before elsewhere on the forum but I just don't get the puffy lips look. If I get a pencil & cover her lips, imagining normal sized ones, she's immediately more attractive to my eyes. The lips are way too big for the face & look a bit preposterous. What's it all about? We need a young person to explain..
It's a women thing though - men don't crave women with massive lips any more than they do huge enhanced knockers.