• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Kenneth Arnold's 1947 UFO Sighting

IMHO Arnold alone didn't launch the UFO craze with the energy it unexpectedly released. It took the synergistic effect of Arnold's sighting propagating through the news, with the second stage boost of Mac Brazel finally getting around to telling folks about the odd debris he found, within the following 2 weeks or so.

I suspect the Roswell story wouldn't have been so big if Arnold's story hadn't been in the air, and I suspect Arnold's story would have faded if the Roswell story hadn't broken hot on its heels.
Comprehensively so.

One led directly to the other.

There was a thoroughly detailed, *factual*, background concerning all of this - irrelevant whether you agree with the author's conclusions - published here:

51354unoClL._SX352_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 
Being interested in UFOs alone is not enough to make you a Fortean? Well, Arnold did branch out into other "things", though I've noticed that people famous for one sort of anomaly hear about others whether they want to or not.

Here's an excerpt from his lecture-turned-article at the First International UFO Congress (June 24-26, 1977) in Chicago:

"I remember one particular case that was related to me. It happened to a young family in Tacoma, Washington. Their twelve-year-old boy turned up missing, and after a very extensive search they found him in Lusk, Wyoming. They didn't have relatives there and the boy, when he was found, didn't know how he got there. It was a completely baffling case.

"I have heard other stories of this type; however, there are so many varieties of the phenomenon that no one knows what is taking place.

"An Ellen Jonerson over in Canby, Oregon, a University of Oregon graduate and a very intelligent person, actually saw a little man. She was stunned to see this little man walk across their breezeway and, standing straight up, pass underneath the running board of a '37 Dodge car. He couldn't have been more than nine inches tall and he had features like a man. He wasn't threatening. He was very-dark skinned; he had on a type of little romper and a sort of plaid shirt. She got a good look at him and when I asked her if she didn't feel like she'd like to get closer to him, she said, "I think I should have run over and grabbed the little fellow." But he walked out into the grass and she never saw him again.

"Some of my recordings are with people who have seen flying men. Now, this kind of shakes me up.

"There are cases, of course, in the records of Charles Fort of persons in Louisville, Kentucky, I think about one hundred years ago, who saw a man who had machinery on his back and who went flying through the air all over town -- without an airplane, without wings or anything! I ran into a lady up here in Washington, Mrs. Viola Johnson, who saw three men in flying suits, and she described them beautifully. They flew a little higher than the telephone wires, and other people saw them, too. I think a lot of other people have experiences like this but think it over and decide maybe they'd better not say anything because newspaper people can do some awful things to people who are perfectly sincere and perfectly honest.

"Another lady, a Mrs. Zaikowski, saw a flying man up in Chehalis, Washington. He had long silver wings and flew about two hundred feet over her barn. A lot of small schoolchildren also saw the flying man and asked to go into her backyard to get a better look at him. He just flew slowly off down the valley and they never saw him again."

Which can be found in:

Fuller, Curtis G. Proceedings of the First International UFO Congress (New York: Warner Books, 1980).
 
What a find that is...

Absolutely fascinating.

I will come back to this soon as...

That's actually quite seriously important in the context of what we were discussing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On a similar note, I once read Albert Bender's (of the first MIB encounter fame) book. He is very clearly a fantasist and completely full of it, which makes me discount the whole MIB thing. There was an overlap back in those days between SF fans and fortean fans. I think Philip K. Dick's only non-sf novel, Confessions of a Crap Artist gives a good portrait of the kind of character – deluded, very much into science fiction but also the books of Fort, Richard Shaver's letters, etc.
 
Attached is complete text copy of my aforenoted FT137 feature article.

This has never been made available previously and if anyone wishes to discuss same, by far the easiest way of doing so.

It's a case I bring to light again as the result of a categorically determining phrase attributed to Arnold at the time.

I had never seen this before until recently browsing the newspapers.com archives.

Screenshot_20200815_071609_resize_25.jpg



"If one dipped, the others did, too", is so telling and reinforces the conclusions of my in-depth research.

Unless mistaken, 'spaceships' don't do that.

However, these guys do precisely the very thing

"Each bird seems to take its cue from the one in front of it, beginning to flap and starting a glide when its predecessor does".

Remember how Arnold described how his enigmatic objects "fluttered" and then glided.

Reasonably confident spaceships don't do that either, perhaps this comparative image I made at the time and have never placed online until now, illustrates the true origin of our 'flying saucers'.

For sure, Arnold's perspective of distance and speed must have been awry, however it's crucial to note his later reported aerial encounter with an incredible 40 or so puzzling objects which seemed to ducks, yet couldn't be, as ducks didn't fly that fast.

pelicomp-2_resize_73.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Arnold.pdf
    165.5 KB · Views: 69
Last edited:
The following extract is from a significant radio interval with Kenneth Arnold, broadcast on 7 April, 1950.

Full details can be found here:

https://www.project1947.com/fig/kamurrow.htm

ARNOLD: That's right. Now of course some of the reports they did take from newspapers which did not quote me properly. Now, when I told the press, they misquoted me, and in the excitement of it all, one newspaper and another on got it as ensnarled up that nobody knew just exactly what they were talking about, I guess.

MURROW: Here's how the name "flying saucer" was born.

ARNOLD: These objects more or less fluttered like they were, oh, I'd say, boats on very rough water or very rough air of some type, and when I described how they flew, I said that they flew like they take a saucer and throw it across the water. Most of the newspapers misunderstood and misquoted that too. They said that I said that they were saucer-like; I said that they flew in a saucer-like fashion.
(End of quote)


Although Arnold had explained all of this preciously, how in April 1950, did not one person in a position of authority seemingly hear the deafening alarm bells even at this later point.

Arnold couldn't have been any clearer - "They said that I said that they were saucer-like; I said that they flew in a saucer-like fashion".

Yet, doubtless because authorities were
receiving so many reports of 'flying disc' sightings and they were also still the subject of a media frenzy, the entire specious foundation was simply overwhelmed.
 
Fast forward to 21 January 1955 and a remarkable newspaper article I have just come across and never seen or heard of previously.

Here, in an ostensibly unrelated, yet Fortean story of a perplexing enigma, Arnold rationalises on the similarly with his own experiences - several separate observations.

He is comfortable using the terminology, 'flying saucers', with the 'Le Grande Evening Observer', reporting Arnold's conclusion, at that time:

"I believe that whatever they are", the flyer explained, "they are living organisms and not controlled by any type of Man from Mars."

Article attached as a pdf file.
 

Attachments

  • clipping_58493730.pdf
    625.8 KB · Views: 21
An interesting report from, 'the Times-News' (Twin Falls, Idaho), dated 9 July, 1947.

Not our headline story, the other one right in the middle:

Screenshot_20200902_054432_compress9.jpg


Researching the invaluable newspaper.com archives, there are, in fact, quite a number of comparative, archive reports, where those gregarious birds have initially raised the question of 'flying saucers', before being identified, for example:

Screenshot_20200902_062303_compress42.jpg


How many similar incidents occurred, where they were not recognised...

Briefly, one other, early and directly related article:

Jackson's Hole Courier, Jackson, Wyoming, 17 June, 1948:

Screenshot_20200902_062845_compress37.jpg


Point being of course, it does seem to support all other cited evidence - not my own suggestion, merely said evidence accumulated - for one possible explanation of what Kenneth Arnold truly observed.
 
Subsequently, Kenneth Arnold went to great lengths emphasising a depection of the nine enigmatic objects he observed, especially that they were never saucer-shaped and how this was a misnomer borne of his description of their undulating flight characteristics, in formation.

Screenshot_20201114_044252_resize_35.jpg


Bob Lazar is equally clear the nine captured alien spaceships he was tasked to help reverse engineer, were the archetypal flying saucers.

How come they were not compatible with what Arnold explained and instead precisely the popularised misconception of same?

Can anyone cite one example in the history of ufology, just a single case, where there was a sighting of one or more objects compatible with Arnold's actual observation and remained unidentified.
 
The simplest explanation for the fact that Arnold's sighting was atypical is that it had a different explanation to most of the other sightings. I suspect pelicans were responsible for Arnold's sighting, as many people have suggested over the years.
Pelicans seem to be one of the better hypotheses.
 
Last edited:
Kenneth Arnold's verbal and textual descriptions of the objects he saw in 1947 were never very clearly elucidated, and they shifted over the years. Furthermore, his earliest accounts of the 1947 sighting didn't claim that all the objects he saw were of the same size and shape. Although he attempted to estimate the objects' size(s), he was notably vague or ambiguous in describing their shape.

The oft-seen photo above shows Arnold years after the sighting with an artist's rendition based on a wooden model Arnold allegedly made of one (but supposedly only one) of the objects he'd seen. This rendering is quite different from Arnold's own sketch of the objects' representative shape that he submitted with his report to the Air Force soon after the sighting, as shown below.

Arnold_AAF_drawing.jpg

As you can see, Arnold's own initial rendering shows a broad profile longer than it is wide, rounded at the front end (as indicated by direction of travel), and somewhat tapering to a central point or protuberance on its relatively flatter and non-rounded rear end.

This is considerably distinct from the radically crescent or boomerang shape in the artist's rendering with which Arnold posed in the photo above.
 
The oft-seen photo above shows Arnold years after the sighting with an artist's rendition based on a wooden model Arnold allegedly made of one (but supposedly only one) of the objects he'd seen. This rendering is quite different from Arnold's own sketch of the objects' representative shape that he submitted with his report to the Air Force soon after the sighting, as shown below.
Quoting from my Fortean Times article, reprinted above:

From these newspaper reports - before the 'flying saucer' mythology got a firm grip on popular imagination - we can locate Kenneth Arnold's earliest expressions. He described the objects as "flat like a pie pan and somewhat bat-shaped," according to Pendleton, Oregon, East Oregonian of June 26. They were "crescent-shaped planes", stated the Oregon Journal on June 27, reporting Arnold as saying: "They looked like they were rocking. I looked for the tails but suddenly realized they didn't have any. They were half-moon shaped, oval in front and convex in the rear."
[End]

Arnold tried to explain and illustrate how the objects seemed to change shape as they flew:

*Another characteristic of these craft
that made a tremendous impression on me was how they fluttered and sailed".

Or perhaps we could say, flapped and glided.

The drawings for IUR are a prime example:

Screenshot_20201219_105819_resize_74.jpg


The much interview later interview with Arnold which I recently unearthed, is a further massive clue to identifying our culprits, when Arnold reveals those objects played, 'follow the leader' - "If one dipped, the others did too".

It's a specific characteristic of undulating flight formation.

The following brief video highlights how their shape can change and why a small squadron of pelicans (actual terminology), dare I say, fits the bill perfectly.

 
This seems to be a somewhat overlooked area in the field of UFO's, but I believe a strong case could be made that at least some of the UFO cases reported in the late 40's and possibly even later, were actually sightings of either recovered German prototypes, or all new aircraft built from German designs.
There is a very striking resemblance between Kenneth Arnold's famous UFO encounter over Mt. Rainer, and the Hortean series of "flying wing" jets developed in German towards the close of the war.
For more information on the Ho IX and Kenneth Arnold, check out the below links.
http://www.nurflugel.com/Nurflugel/Horten_Nurflugels/horten_nurflugels.html
http://www.project1947.com/fig/1947ka.htm
I'd be interested to know if anyone else has investigated the possible link between the two. I did manage to find a few websites that proposed the same theory, but I don't recall it ever being given the same level of support as the "little green men/little grey men/evil gov't men" theory.

Godsdamn, I got this idea into the letters page of FT once, I think it was in the late 1990's or early 2000's..... Dr David Sutton was kind enough to have a look in the archives but could't pinpoint the letter. As I recall, I'd made the association because I'd picked up a fairly scholarly well-written book on German expeimental weapons of WW2. The Horten IX, according to the authors of the book, was just on the brink of going onto squadron service with the Luftwaffe, having passed all its tests and demonstrating it was a good idea. For it to compose an actual squadron, therefore, suggests not only one, but at least a dozen, airworthy planes had been built. They were built and tested at Göttingen, which was over-run by the US Army in late April 1945. We know all the occupying powers denuded Germany of high-tech military equipment for evaluation (as the German Navy's home ports were largely captured by the British, the Royal Navy benefited vastly from German tech right into the 1980's and maybe later). Therefore I suggested that as military enthusiasts and UFO-nuts tend to live in their own worlds and not really talk to each other very much.... is is possible that Ufology has missed an obvious explanation here?

If anyone could find this letter - FT even printed my suggested illustrations - I'd be really pleased!
 
Therefore I suggested that as military enthusiasts and UFO-nuts tend to live in their own worlds and not really talk to each other very much.... is is possible that Ufology has missed an obvious explanation here?
I did investigate this thoroughly and the following is taken from my FT137 cover article:

"As an experienced pilot, Kenneth Arnold seemed to be a reliable witness; but what could he have observed that so perplexed him? The most obvious explanation was a formation of military aircraft, which for some reason he didn't recognise and was simply mistaken about their airspeed.

On first examination, there are some intriguing possibilities about this hypothesis. Arnold's crescent-like object resembles the tail-less 'flying wing' concept pioneered by John 'Jack' Northrop in the United States. Northrop's XB-35, YB-49 and particularly YRB-49A were all similar to Arnold's depiction.

However, prior to 24 June 1947, only one XB-35 had been built and due to several mechanical problems it had been grounded since the previous September. The second XB-35 to be built made its maiden flight on 26 June, 1947, two days after Arnold's sighting. The testing was carried out at Muroc Dry Lake (later re-named Edwards Air Force Base) in California, far removed from Washington's Cascade mountain range. The Northrop YB-49, a jet-propelled derivative of the XB-35, first flew on 21 October 1948. Only one YRB-49A was built, but that didn't take off until May 1950.

In Germany, the Horten brothers - contemporaries and counterparts of Jack Northrop - had also developed innovative 'flying wing' designs. Their 'Ho IX' (also known as the 'Go 229') was nearing production as WWII ended. During late April 1945, the Horten plant at Friedrichsroda was occupied by American troops and, allegedly, one of the 'Ho IX' airframes was transported back to the to the US. The design is almost identical to Arnold's crescent-like sketch.

So, decades before today's dark rumours about recovered alien technology at Area 51, could the US Air Force have been indulging, ain a spot of clandestine reverse-engineering, not of alien but German craft? Aviation historians seem satisfied that the looted 'Ho IX' airframe was never completed and test-flown in the US. Even if it had been, those other eight, tail-less objects that escorted it and matched its airspeed are not accounted for. The contemporary similarity between experimental flying wings and Arnold's 'flying saucers' is therefore a remarkable coincidence and nothing more. The hypothesis that Arnold witnessed nine such top-secret, tail-less aircraft is not, evidently, sustainable".
 
Last edited:
This maneuvering ability displayed by Idaho UFO, reminds me of the "Wollaton Gnomes":

ID UFO:
"“The canyon floor underneath at that particular point was that it rode up and down over the hills and hollows at a speed indicating some type of control faster then the reflexes of man. It is my opinion it is guided by some type of instruments and must be powered by atomic energy, as it made very little noise – just a s-w-i-s-h when it passed by.”

WGs:
"The little men were riding in small bubble-like vehicles. These cars were completely silent but they were very quick and could jump and skip over anything in their way such as fallen trees or branches.
Down near the lake they seemed to be enjoying riding over the marshy swampy area, and a few of them chased the children towards the exit gate from the park, just in play, though, not aggressively. "
 
I have recently come across research material from some years ago and it might be of interest:

[Start]
Arnold was attempting to explain how all nine flew in formation and confirmed this is his subsequent book:

"I was fascinated by this formation of aircraft. They didn't fly like any aircraft I had ever seen before. In the first place, their echelon formation was backward from that practiced by our Air Force. The elevation of the first craft was greater than that of the last. They flew in a definite formation, but erratically.

As I described them at the time, their flight was like speed boats on rough water or similar to the tail of a Chinese kite that I once saw blowing in the wind. Or maybe it would be best to describe their flight characteristics as very similar to a formation of geese, in a rather diagonal chain-like line, as if they were linked together. As I put it to newsmen in Pendleton, Oregon, they flew like a saucer would if you skipped it across the water".

There's another attribute they had and one which Arnold declared had a big impact on him, presumably concerning his awareness of how unusual the sighting was.

As Arnold put it, they "fluttered and sailed" and recalled in his book:

"Another characteristic of these craft that made a tremendous impression on me was how they fluttered and sailed, tipping their wings alternately and emitting those very bright blue-white flashes from their surfaces".

There's little, if any, debate on this point and Arnold confirmed it in the speech he gave at the 'First International UFO Congress', Chicago, ILL, during June 24, 1977:

"I observed it seemed to... the first craft was at a higher elevation than all the rest of craft, which, of course, is not conventional, military formation at all, in either this country or Russia or Germany or anything that I had ever heard of before.

...and they would flutter like this and sail and they seemed to fly just as readily on edge as they did on a level. As I mentioned before they seemed like they were linked together in a sort of diagonal chain-like formation, similar to geese, but, uh (chuckle) they were not geese.

I was very puzzled about that. However, I made a special note, they were all independent. Individually they were flying on their own, but every once in a while one of them would give off a flash like this and gain a little more altitude or deviate just a little bit from the echelon formation. And this went periodically on among them... alternatingly, I should say...".
[End]

That's our, 'flying saucers', whose mimicry in relation to the quite distinctive characteristics of American White Pelicans is uncanny.
 
The essence of Arnold's report and resultant panic, in midst of that cold-war era, was not of course related to an extraterrestrial enigma, it was the threat of a secret Russian weapon.

Central to all, was Arnold's claim relating to the speed of those presumed aircraft.

The following is Arnold's rationale for his calculated airspeed.

A question for those who might have an understanding of the maths involved here.

What are parameters herein for taking the data to be accurate, or otherwise?

This must be reliable... is it?

[Start]
I knew they must be very large to observe their shape at that distance, even on as clear a day as it was that Tuesday. In fact I compared a zeus fastener or cowling tool I had in my pocket - holding it up on them and holding it up on the DC-4 - that I could observe at quite a distance to my left, and they seemed smaller than the DC-4; but I should judge their span would have been as wide as the furthest engines on each side of the DC-4.

I observed the chain of these objects passing another snow-covered ridge in between Mt. Rainier and Mt. Adams, and as the first one was passing the south crest of this ridge the last object was entering the northern crest of the ridge. As I was flying in the direction of this particular ridge, I measured it and found it to be approximately five miles so I could safely assume that the chain of these saucer like objects were at least five miles long.

Even though they held a constant direction they swerved in and out of the high mountain peaks which are found on the hogback of the Cascade mountains between Mount Rainier and Mount Adams. I determined my distance from their pathway to be in the vicinity of 23 miles because I knew where I was and they revealed their true position by disappearing from my sight momentarily behind a jagged peak that juts out from the base of Mt. Rainier proper. Considering that I was flying all this time in the direction of their formation, the determination can be only approximate, but it is not too far off.

Between Mount Rainier and Mount Adams there is a very high plateau with quite definite north and south edges. Part of this chain-like formation traveled above this plateau toward Mount Adams, while part of the formation actually dipped below the near edge. As the first unit of these craft cleared the southernmost edge of this background, the last of the formation was just entering the northern edge. I later flew over this plateau in my plane and came to a close approximation that this whole formation of craft, whatever they were, formed a chain in the neighborhood of five miles long.

As the last unit of this formation passed the southern most high snow covered crest of Mt. Adams, I looked at my sweep second hand and it showed that they traveled the distance in one minute and forty-two seconds. Even at the time this timing did not upset me as I felt confident after I would land there would be some explanation of what I saw. I might add that my complete observation of these objects, which I could even follow by their flashes as they passed Mt. Adams, was around two and one-half or three minutes--although, by the time they reached Mt. Adams they were out of my range of vision as far as determining shape or form.
[End]
 
The following is significant evidence in our story:

[START]
First Radio Interview with Kenneth Arnold; 25 June 1947
By John Powell

The following is thought to be (considered to be) the first public interview Kenneth Arnold gave regarding his sighting. Thanks go to Mike Christol for providing the audiotape. JP.


NEWSCASTER:

The nation, every newscaster, and every newspaper across the nation has made headlines out of it, and this afternoon we are honored, indeed, to have here in our studio this man, Kenneth Arnold, who, we believe, may be able to give us a first-hand account and give you the same on what happened.

Kenneth, first of all if you'll move up here to the microphone just a little closer, we'll ask you to just tell in your own fashion, as you told us last night in your hotel room, and again this morning, what you were doing there and how this entire thing started. Go ahead, Kenneth.


KENNETH ARNOLD:

Well, about 2:15 I took off from Chehalis, Washington, en route to Yakima, and, of course, every time that any of us fly over the country near Mt. Rainier, we spend an hour or two in search of the Marine plane that's never been found that they believe is in the snow someplace southwest of that particular area. That area is located at about, it's elevation is about 10,000 foot, and I had made one sweep in close to Mt. Rainier and down one of the canyons and was dragging it for any types of objects that might prove to be the Marine ship, uh, and as I come out of the canyon there, was about 15 minutes, I was approximately 25 to 28 miles from Mt. Rainier, I climbed back up to 9200 feet and I noticed to the { left of me a chain which looked to me like the tail of a Chinese kite, kind of weaving and going at a terrific speed across the face of Mt. Rainier. I, at first, thought they were geese because it flew like geese, but it was going so fast that I immediately changed my mind and decided it was a bunch of new jet planes in formation.

Well, as the plane come to the edge of Mt. Rainier flying at about 160 degrees south, I thought I would clock them because it was such a clear day, and I didn't know where there destination was, but due to the fact that I had Mt. Saint Helens and Mt. Adams to clock them by, I just thought I'd see just how fast they were going, since among pilots we argue about speed so much. And, they seemed to flip and flash in the sun, just like a mirror, and, in fact, I happened to be in an angle from the sun that seemed to hit the tops of these peculiar looking things in such a way that it almost blinded you when you looked at them through your plexiglass windshield.

Well, uh, I uh, it was about one minute to three when I started clocking them on my sweep second hand clock, and as I kept looking at them, I kept looking for their tails, and they didn't have any tail. I thought, well, maybe something's wrong with my eyes and I turned the plane around and opened the window, and looked out the window, and sure enough, I couldn't find any tails on 'em. And, uh, the whole, our observation of these particular ships, didn't last more than about two and a half minutes and I could see them only plainly when they seemed to tip their wing, or whatever it was, and the sun flashed on them. They looked something like a pie plate that was cut in half with a sort of a convex triangle in the rear. Now, I thought, well, that maybe they're jet planes with just the tails painted green or brown or something, and I didn't think too much of it, but kept on watching them.

They didn't fly in a conventional formation that's taught in our army, they seemed to kind of weave in and out right above the mountaintops, and I would say that they even went down into the canyons in several instances, oh, probably a hundred feet, but I could see them against the snow, of course, on Mt. Rainier and against the snow on Mt. Adams as they were flashing, and against a high ridge that happens to lay in between Mt. Rainier and Mt. Adams. But when I observed the tail end of the last one passing Mt. Adams, and I was at an angle near Mt. Rainier from it, but I looked at my watch and it showed one minute and 42 seconds. Well, I felt that was pretty fast } and I didn't stop to think what the distance was between the two mountains. Well, I landed at Yakima, Washington, and Al Baxter was there to greet me and he said ...[unintelligible]... and, he told me, I guess I better change my brand, but he kind of gave me a mysterious sort of a look that maybe I had seen something, he didn't know, and well, I just kind of forgot it then, until I got down to Pendleton and I began looking at my map and taking measurements on it and the best calculation I could figure out, now even in spite of error, would be around 1200 miles an hour, because making the distance from Mt. Rainier to Mt. Adams, in, we'll say approximately two minutes, it's almost, well, it'd be around 25 miles per minute.

Now allowing for air, we can give them three minutes or four minutes to make it, and they're still going more than 800 miles an hour, and to my knowledge, there isn't anything that I've read about, outside of some of the German rockets, that would go that fast. These were flying in more or less a level, constant altitude. They weren't going up and they weren't going down. They were just simply flying straight and level and I, I laughed ...[unintelligible]..., they sure must have had a tailwind. But it didn't seem to help me much. But to the best of my knowledge, and the best of my description, that is what I actually saw, and, uh, like I told the Associated Press, I'll, I'd be glad to confirm it with my hands on a Bible because I did see it, and whether it has anything to do with our army or our intelligence or whether it has to do with some foreign country, I don't know. But I did see it and I did clock it and I just happened to be in a beautiful position to do it and it's just as much a mystery to me as it is to everyone else who's been calling me the last 24 hours, wondering what it was.


NEWSCASTER:

Well, Kenneth, thank you very much. I know that you've certainly been busy these last 24 hours, 'cause I've spent some of the time with you myself, and I know that the press associations, both Associated Press and our press, the United Press, has been right after you every minute. The Associated and the United Press, all over the nation, have been after this story. It's been on every newscast, over the air, and in every newspaper I know of. The United Press in Portland has made several telephone calls here at Pendleton to me, and to you this morning, and from New York I understand, they are after this story, and that we may have an answer ...[unintelligible]... because, if it is some new type of army or navy secret missile, there would probably a story come out on it from the army or navy asking, saying that it is a new secret plane and that will be all there is to it, and they will hush up the story, or perhaps that we will finally get a definite answer to it.

I understand the United Press is checking on it out of New York now with the Army, and also with the Navy, and we hope to have some concrete answer before nightfall. We certainly want to thank you, Kenneth for coming into our studio. We feel very pleased that this news which is making nationwide news across the country, we are able to give our listeners over KWRC a first-hand report direct from you, of what you saw. And we urge our listeners to keep tuned to this station, because anytime this afternoon or this evening, and we get something on it on our United Press teletype, which is in direct communications with new York, Chicago, Portland, in fact, every United Press bureau across the nation, why, we'll have it on the air.
[END]


Again and crucially the following day, Arnold is clear in his description, confirmed in the model he subsequently had made and photographed showing (see post #69).

"They looked something like a pie plate that was cut in half with a sort of a convex triangle in the rear".

http://www.arpnet.it/ufo/arno_int.htm
 
And as you mentioned earlier, Comfortably Numb, the lead object was in a crescent form:
1613583917382.jpeg

While the others were in the form:
1613583974964.jpeg
 
And as you mentioned earlier, Comfortably Numb, the lead object was in a crescent form: ...
While the others were in the form: ...

Arnold would not mention any distinction between the frontmost / leading object and the others until later. It was not until this later date (whenever it was) that Arnold described the leading object in a way that suggested an overall crescent form.
 
Arnold would not mention any distinction between the frontmost / leading object and the others until later. It was not until this later date (whenever it was) that Arnold described the leading object in a way that suggested an overall crescent form.
Thanks, good to know! I thought that he had later just endorsed an artist's rendering from his description, then thought he had described it that way all along, but this makes sense.
 
It's good to see this case being re-examined again. It is certainly possible that the US might have been testing captured German aircraft, only in recent years has it become clear just how radical some of the craft were, including "saucers" with exotic propulsion. But what really interests me is that, regardless of exactly what Arnold saw over Mt Rainier, when he began to look into the phenomenon he got involved in just the same kind of bizarre goings-on that John Keel would experience two decades later in his own researches -- odd coincidences, being expected in places where he never planned to go, mysterious strangers engaging with him then disappearing. I can't help feeling that something was operating behind the scenes, orchestrating things for its own purposes. If we knew just what was going on in the 1940s it might hold the key to the whole phenomenon.
 
I don't know that it could have been captured German technology, as there weren't really any captured flying wings for example, that were in a state to fly, as has been discussed before. Also, Arnold's sighting came at <edit> the beginning off a peak in a wave of sightings that would cause great worry in the government. They desperately wanted to "run one down" or shoot one down.
https://www.project1947.com/
 
I don't know that it could have been captured German technology, as there weren't really any captured flying wings for example, that were in a state to fly, as has been discussed before. Also, Arnold's sighting came at <edit> the beginning off a peak in a wave of sightings that would cause great worry in the government. They desperately wanted to "run one down" or shoot one down.
https://www.project1947.com/
I think it unlikely, although as we now know at least one major piece of technology, the infamous Bell, did get acquired by the US, although it proved to be more dangerous to its pilots than it would to the enemy! I certainly suspect that the Roswell case points to some secret test gone wrong, and "aliens" were very cleverly introduced to muddy the water.
 
I think it unlikely, although as we now know at least one major piece of technology, the infamous Bell, did get acquired by the US, although it proved to be more dangerous to its pilots than it would to the enemy! I certainly suspect that the Roswell case points to some secret test gone wrong, and "aliens" were very cleverly introduced to muddy the water.
I agree that the Roswell Incident is damaged beyond repair. It is almost pointless to discuss it unless more real evidence comes out; it might indeed have been some military test, though apparently no one was looking for anything that might have crashed. I've lost track of all the supposed witnesses, etc.
 
Last edited:
A lot of the evidence from the witnesses points to a cover-up rather than any genuine "alien" crash. When you are in the military, with access to crates and boxes and body bags of all kinds, why phone the local undertaker to ask for children's coffins? Unless you want to plant the idea of small alien bodies in the witness's mind.
 
... I can't help feeling that something was operating behind the scenes, orchestrating things for its own purposes. If we knew just what was going on in the 1940s it might hold the key to the whole phenomenon.

There's no big mystery to it ... The previously dominant western European powers had effectively committed near-suicidal self-harm twice in the space of 30 years, crippling them on the world stage. In the wake of WW2 there were two new powers at the top of the heap - the USA and USSR.

The USA had an economy re-invigorated by the war, the largest array of production facilities left intact, an already leading position in the newly-crowned #1 war tech field of aviation, and exclusive possession of the new nuclear super-weapon. They also had a traumatic memory of Pearl Harbor, which engendered a considerable national paranoia about ever allowing anyone else to ambush us like that again.

Meanwhile, the USSR - who'd suffered the most casualties of anyone - had the largest pool of natural resources under one government's control, a governing structure which had tightened its totalitarian grip domestically, and self-anointed self-validation for pursuing a global communist crusade. They'd also acquired all of eastern Europe as de facto colonies to supplement / augment their war-damaged academic and industrial resources. More specifically, they'd ended up with as much of Germany's advanced rocketry R&D infrastructure and products as anyone.

Both these newly ascendant powers were deeply suspicious of the other. In the USA authorities were keenly apprehensive about two things:

- the prospects for anyone launching a surprise airborne attack against their home territory and
- who might next acquire an A-bomb capability

The former provided compelling motivation for the US government and USAAF / USAF to be keenly interested in aerospace tech and any clues that their airspace could be, or had been, breached. The latter provided the motivation for the top secret monitoring program (Project Mogul) that resulted in the mission failure whose debris Mac Brazel discovered.

In the mean time, Kenneth Arnold's interesting report of mystery objects flying over the Pacific Northwest (bolstered by what were either vapid copycat or valid additional sightings) provided the seed for a general-purpose popular interest in, and paranoia about, airborne 'others' overflying America.

The intersection and synergies among these things in the summer of 1947 engendered a whole new area of popular mysteries and memetic proliferation in the public's consciousness.
 
Back
Top