The squabble of the age in journals nobody reads is being played out between the 'analytic' school of philosophy derived from Russell & co. and the Post Modern wedge taking their lead from Derrida, Foucoult and counterless other black polo-neck wearing Galoise smokers.
It is a savage cat fight and a half - Sokal & Bricmont's 'Intellectual Impostures' captures the spirit of it, as academics accuse one another of all manner of deviancy.
So, where does Fort fit into this? Pipe smoking Russellesque logical vigour or cappucino-sipping, reclaiming the 'excluded' and posing on a book cover deconstruction?
It is a savage cat fight and a half - Sokal & Bricmont's 'Intellectual Impostures' captures the spirit of it, as academics accuse one another of all manner of deviancy.
So, where does Fort fit into this? Pipe smoking Russellesque logical vigour or cappucino-sipping, reclaiming the 'excluded' and posing on a book cover deconstruction?