• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

‘Jewitches’ Embrace Both Judaism & Witchcraft

maximus otter

Recovering policeman
Joined
Aug 9, 2001
Messages
15,351
In a scene from a recently released movie, three older women in a small room slowly walk clockwise around a table covered in candles, chanting curses softly.

A scene from the latest “Macbeth” remake? Not exactly: It’s a moment from indie film “A Kaddish for Bernie Madoff,” a musical exploration of spirituality, Jewish identity and the Bernie Madoff case.

Its creator, Alicia Jo Rabins, identifies as a Jewish artist and educator who incorporates elements of witchcraft into her practice of Judaism, an increasingly common, if still controversial, combination.

800.jpeg


In this July 2016 photo provided by the Kohenet Hebrew Priestess Institute, Yael Schonzeit chants from the Torah during a Kohenet Hebrew Priestess Institute training week in Northern California, accompanied by Kohenet co-founder Rabbi Jill Hammer, bottom right

In both the modern witchcraft and Jewish communities, people are bringing together magic — often called witchcraft — and religious ritual. The ways in which these two seemingly distinct practices merge is often highly personal, depending on heritage, education and spiritual calling.

Rabins admits the two practices seem contradictory, considering that at several points the Torah specifically forbids witchcraft. She interprets these passages as prohibitions against negative practices. The two also overlap in their observance of the natural world: Rabin is a member of a women’s group that gathers for “Rosh Hodesh,” or each new moon, a longstanding tradition in Judaism as well as in witchcraft.

But in an ancient patriarchal society, she said, Jewish leaders likely wanted to set themselves apart from the surrounding culture.

Rabbi Jill Hammer highlighted this point in an interview with Religion News Service, explaining that the difference between Jewish ritual and witchcraft is mostly political.

“Often the way that it’s structured is, if you’re part of the hierarchy … it’s called ritual, it’s called prayer, it’s called ceremony. And if you are doing something outside of the hierarchy, that’s often called magic or sorcery or witchcraft,” Hammer explained.

https://apnews.com/article/religion-judaism-aa34f2501659dfb3a31ca5956860ebc5

maximus otter
 
As someone who is a Jew and practices it, my opinion differs.

The substantial difference between my religion and witchcraft, is that our religious rituals are enabling G-D's blessing into the world,

whereas witchcraft is seeking to manipulate the world by means of ceremonies/spells etc.

To fuse Judaism and witchcraft is very misguided, it's akin to having a "Jews for Bacon Cheeseburgers" cult.
 
Last edited:
@Victory, I hope you were not offended by my post. Of course you are correct insofar as witchcraft having no place in your religion. It also has no place in the religion I was brought up in (and still practice, to varying degrees of faithfulness, throughout my adult life). The "Jewitches" in the original post do not practice the same faith that you do, any more than Baptists, Mormons, Unitarians, or the many "non-denominational" Christians practice Roman Catholicism.

I was speaking in general terms of the nature of ritual and prayer in religion. I respectfully submit that, objecively, the difference between enabling one's Lord's blessing and manipulating the world is one of degree, not of kind. As the curator of the exhibit mentioned in Floyd1's post says, "we’re not exactly talking about sorcery. We’re talking about beneficial practices." I think many practitioners of what is called "witchcraft" today see their rituals as more akin to prayer than sorcery.
 
@chafink

I was not offended by your post.

I agree that the women are not practicing Judaism.
Though we presume, that by Jewish law they are Jewish, because they have Jewish mothers or converted under proper auspices.

I strongly differ that enabling G-D's blessing and magic are similar by degree.
To me and to my faith they are fundamentally different in kind, utterly different practices, drawing from different spiritual forces.

I point out that of the amulets described in the article @Floyd1 posted, if these amulets were written by a Baal Shem or other holy person, they have been used to ward off evil.
But they are not magic, they are asking G-D that in the merit of the good deeds done by the holy person (and perhaps the wearer) G-D bestows blessings and wards off evil.

The bowls used to capture spirits are (obscure) folklore and custom, but not magic.
And they are not longer used to my knowledge.

It is clear that Jews have at times used bits of folklore and customs from non-Jewish sources, no one would dispute that.

In some instances these are non controversial i.e. a popular melody for the song Ma'Oz Tzur is adapted from an early modern German folk tune.

In other instances these are highly controversial i.e. Kapparot... the practice of swinging a live chicken around one's head on the eve of Yom Kippur, declaring it an atonement for sin, then giving it to the poor to eat.
Which even some very religious people regard as a non-Jewish folk custom; pointedly unneccessary, and even when the chicken is replaced by a tray or bag of money which is then given to the poor, should be abandoned.
Charity can be given without upsetting a chicken.
 
Last edited:
If they are anything like my Neo=pagan friends they spend all their time putting down their family religion while wholeheartedly constantly referring back to it.
 
@chafink

I was not offended by your post.

I agree that the women are not practicing Judaism.
Though we presume, that by Jewish law they are Jewish, because they have Jewish mothers or converted under proper auspices.

I strongly differ that enabling G-D's blessing and magic are similar by degree.
To me and to my faith they are fundamentally different in kind, utterly different practices, drawing from different spiritual forces.

I point out that of the amulets described in the article @Floyd1 posted, if these amulets were written by a Baal Shem or other holy person, they have been used to ward off evil.
But they are not magic, they are asking G-D that in the merit of the good deeds done by the holy person (and perhaps the wearer) G-D bestows blessings and wards off evil.

The bowls used to capture spirits are (obscure) folklore and custom, but not magic.
And they are not longer used to my knowledge.

It is clear that Jews have at times used bits of folklore and customs from non-Jewish sources, no one would dispute that.

In some instances these are non controversial i.e. a popular melody for the song Ma'Oz Tzur is adapted from an early modern German folk tune.

In other instances these are highly controversial i.e. Kapparot... the practice of swinging a live chicken around one's head on the eve of Yom Kippur, declaring it an atonement for sin, then giving it to the poor to eat.
Which even some very religious people regard as a non-Jewish folk custom; pointedly unneccessary, and even when the chicken is replaced by a tray or bag of money which is then given to the poor, should be abandoned.
Charity can be given without upsetting a chicken.

Why do you write "G-D" is it because Hebrew doesn't have vowels in written form?
 
If I may offer an explanation until Victory can chime in:

It is a tradition with some religious people, especially Jews, to leave the vowels out of any of the deity's names both because it makes the written name unpronounceable, and because it avoids writing such a name on something that could be destroyed.

It is considered highly inappropriate to use any of the names outside of solemn prayer, or to write one on something that might be destroyed.

@Victory, please correct me if I'm wrong, and accept my apologies for using what I thought was only a euphemism, but which I now understand is considered a name, in my reply to you.
 
If I may offer an explanation until Victory can chime in:
Yes, we don't write any of G-D's names in full in case they are destroyed.

So we often use "Hashem" which in Hebrew means "The name".

Also it is common when practicing a blessing to learn it, rather than using it for the purpose it is intended, to slightly change G-D's name in the way we pronounce it, to avoid taking the name in vain.
 
Every religion has its mysticism.

A long time ago on the TV show X-Files, the story line was a distraught Jewish wife was making a golem of her dead husband using Jewish Kabbalah.

Scully and Moulder had to stop the very unfriendly golem.
 
In the late '90s, while reading up on the varieties of paganism, I was very surprised to discover self-described "Jewish Pagans."

These particular people got around the apparently air-tight prohibition on having "other gods before the One God" by arguing that it was OK to have other gods AFTER the One God (i.e. revering them secondarily as beings of a decidedly lower spiritual stature). This argument struck me as too clever by half, but then I frequently find religious expression confusing and confounding.

Looked at another way, most religions forbid some sort of behavior, but which prohibitions are considered essential, and which merely recommended, tend to vary over time. Surely a superhuman intellect could devise a fool-proof and obviously correct set of rules for its followers to observe? Or are we mortals just too flawed to recognize a fool-proof set of rules when we see it? Maybe arguing over the rules is meant to teach us something of value...
 
I think most religious rules are devised by humans, trying to codify what they believe their deity or deities expect of them. Even when the rules are directly dictated to mankind (as in parts of the Bible) humans still have to interpret them.
 
I think most religious rules are devised by humans, trying to codify what they believe their deity or deities expect of them. Even when the rules are directly dictated to mankind (as in parts of the Bible) humans still have to interpret them.

"Most"? Which ones aren't? (Serious question).
 
"Most"? Which ones aren't? (Serious question).
Well not to get too far into it, but formal Buddhist teaching does not recognize a deity, but there are still rules - because it's kind of obvious that they are a better way to go.
 
Well not to get too far into it, but formal Buddhist teaching does not recognize a deity, but there are still rules - because it's kind of obvious that they are a better way to go.

Thanks, but I was wondering which religious rules have not been devised by humans, if "most" have?
 
Thanks, but I was wondering which religious rules have not been devised by humans, if "most" have?
Ah. I would take the "most" as modifying "trying to codify" since a religious person will always say that the deity created the rules.
 
I think most religious rules are devised by humans...
...Which ones aren't?...
...formal Buddhist teaching does not recognize a deity, but there are still rules....
I was responding to Aether Blue, who was specifically asking about rules from "a superhuman intellect". I suppose some Buddhist teachers fall into that category in some people's minds.
Thanks, but I was wondering which religious rules have not been devised by humans, if "most" have?
Ah. I would take the "most" as modifying "trying to codify" since a religious person will always say that the deity created the rules.
Yeah, all of what Lb8535 said - but I was also being generous in allowing for the hypothetical possibility of a deity to present the rules directly to some humans - and as I said, even those would need human interpretation of some kind.
 
Back
Top