This was in reply to a post about Expedition Bigfoot. I have just watched an episode where they came up with the theory that Bigfoots sometimes disguise themselves as..wait for it..a man in a ghillie suit.It's almost as if they don't want to be able to tell the difference between a Bigfoot and a man in a ghillie suit.
Presumably a very, very big man in a ghillie suitThis was in reply to a post about Expedition Bigfoot. I have just watched an episode where they came up with the theory that Bigfoots sometimes disguise themselves as..wait for it..a man in a ghillie suit.
Crafty buggers aren’t they? Is the plural of Bigfoot Bigfoots or Bigfeet?This was in reply to a post about Expedition Bigfoot. I have just watched an episode where they came up with the theory that Bigfoots sometimes disguise themselves as..wait for it..a man in a ghillie suit.
It's the ultimate double bluff.
It's 'bigfoots', they just have big feet. Which raises the question, shouldn't the singular be 'bigfeet', and the plural 'bigfeets'? After all, nobody ever claimed bigfoot has only one big foot. Apart from The Goodies.
'BIG-FOOTIES' maybe more relevant right now perhaps?
I think it was Loren Coleman who said the plural should be Bigfoot. As with deer, moose, elk, and so on. I don't reckon it matters much. None of the uses mentioned seem confusing. I wonder what a rabble of Bigfoot should be called. Gang? Passel? Posse?
A stench of Bigfoot for big groups. A whiff for small groups.
It is so convincing when the camera pans around the lake then stops and goes back to where Bigfoot will shortly appear.... They then slowly steer the boat towards where the creature was seen rather than where it was headed *sigh*
Wow it really says fail when Thinker Thunker calls your hoax out as a fake! That fellow seems to endorse almost every blobsquatch as the real thing.
I've always found him to be a very good and reasoned researcher. He goes into detail if he thinks a picture is genuine.
Posted "Looks like a person in a too big costume, having problems walking normally." on the video and got shadow banned.
Really? That's never been my impression - unless I'm confusing him with someone else. Is he the dude who insists two obviously human hunters, wearing shirts and pants are two Sasquatch?
He has done detailed analysis of the Patty film and concluded it is real from the proportions of the subject. He is very honest and points out hoaxes. Never seen the hunters in shirts and pants thing.
I'll check out his channel - maybe I'm mixing him up with someone else
Ah, so that's why there's no negative comments under the vid. I never know what to make of people who express such mindblowing gullibility & at the same time suppress all dissent. Is he a true believer, or is he intent on exploiting other true believers for gain?
