Babyin the BathWater
So, where is the baby then?
Yet, I was not willing to throw the baby (if there were) away with the bathwater. The only potential "baby" left were the Pleiadians/Plejarens. Another words, I am open to the possibility that there had been some kind of contact (at least initially), for I have not yet found a reason to dismiss this possibility entirely.
It is this question that kept me on the case thus far.
rynner said:
I think several people here agree with you. In fact I suggested much the same back on page 7 of this thread! ... But, sometimes, some religious prophets do have some small degree of psychic or paranormal powers, which of course they explain and exploit according to their belief system. Do you think this is the case with Meier, or is the whole thing made up, i.e. hoaxed?
Indeed, rynner and Emperor, both of you (plus few others) seemed to have come to similar conclusions about the cult. Meier claims to have a telepathic ability to link with the Plejarens. I have not dismissed this either. I theorize (not with great confidence) that he was able to contact the Plejarens with this ability, and became corrupt along the way.
Emperor said:
One thing I was wondering was; Is Billy Meier actively promoting the cult-like/religious aspects or has this emerged through the work of disciples? For example he doesn't seem to have done a vast amount of promotion of his own material (despite the fact that he has a tonne of stuff and could make a pretty penny out of it) but other people have stepped into the breech. There is a long history of people having unusual encounters (or even making things up) which has been jumped on and promoted by people (often members of the clergy) to further their own ends making them reluctant prophets.
The Reluctant Messiah Syndrome (RMS), i think is a part of what i call "cult mentality." This approach is repeated in most all cults IMO. Yes, Emperor, I agree this is case here as well.
And why are these people drawn to a cult involving ET's? Why not God's angels? The reason is simple. Outer space is a concept of the unknown that is inextricably linked to, but beyond the reach of, 20th century's dominant epistomology -- science. When Christianity held sway, it was ghosts, witches, fairies, angels, devils, etc.
AMPHIARAUS said:
Can I ask what leads you to persist with interest in Meier even though you have seen through the cultish and false nature of his claims?
At first, I dropped the whole case for the reasons already discussed in the forum. But, i found the story gripping enough that i wanted to give it a fair try and read through the whole thing. My interest/focus has always been on the Plejarens, not on Meier.
----------
The photos were initial cause of suspicion for me as well. Once exposed of the fraud, the coverup spin states that some ET called, Baawis, collaborating with the Plejarens mentally transmitted all the details of the photograph to a painter. I consider this "spin doctoring" not only unlikely, but a blatant insults to reader's intelligence. Then again, most cult followers are not known for their intellect.
Then there are the "prophecies." This is where Meier really screwed up IMO.
---------
Today is 4th of July, and my 4-yo son is not leaving me alone. I have to go out to a park now. To be continued...
-