- Joined
- Jul 19, 2004
- Messages
- 29,622
- Location
- Out of Bounds
I found this preliminary study from Australia interesting. It concerned children's ratings of "reality" for a variety of familiar cultural figures. These ratings were compared against a small survey of adults. If nothing else, it demonstrated children gave more credence to certain cultural figures (Santa; Tooth Fairy) if there were indirect evidence (i.e., gifts) suggesting those figures' tangible presence and / or actions.
I wonder whether further such research might shed light on the development and / or maintenance of personal beliefs in Fortean subjects.
FULL STORY (With More Detailed Data): https://scitechdaily.com/is-santa-r...al-figures-from-the-tooth-fairy-to-spongebob/
I wonder whether further such research might shed light on the development and / or maintenance of personal beliefs in Fortean subjects.
Is Santa Real? Examining Children’s Beliefs in Cultural Figures From the Tooth Fairy to SpongeBob
Young children understand dinosaurs and The Wiggles are (or were!) real, and that fictional characters like Peter Pan and Spongebob are not real — but cultural figures like Santa or the Tooth Fairy occupy an ambiguous place in a child’s pantheon, suggests a study published June 17, 2020 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Rohan Kapitány from Keele University, and colleagues.
Children as young as three are capable of understanding the difference between “real” and “non-real.” However, there’s little research into how children evaluate different types of non-real people or figures relative to one another, as well as in comparison to real people.
In order to better understand children’s beliefs, Kapitány and colleagues asked 176 Australian children two to eleven years old to rate how real they considered thirteen different figures ... The authors hypothesized that their results might show a hierarchy between real and unreal, with some unreal figures perceived as more real by children depending on indirect evidence or cultural rituals at play — like setting out milk and cookies for Santa that have “vanished” by Christmas morning. For comparison, they also assessed 56 adults. ...
The data suggested the majority of children conceptualized the thirteen figures into four groups, based on score endorsements: ranked most highly as “real” were figures like dinosaurs and The Wiggles (with a score of 7 points); the next-highest score went to cultural figures like Santa and the Tooth Fairy (6 points), followed by ambiguous figures like aliens, dragons, and ghosts (4 points) and fictional characters like Peter Pan, Spongebob, and Elsa (4 points). In comparison, adults (and older children, from seven years up) tended to group figures into three groups: real, not-real, and ambiguous (ghosts and aliens).
Although this study is limited in that there was no standard definition of “real” provided to the participants ... , the relatively high belief in cultural figures among younger children remains notable. The authors plan future work to understand how ritual participation and other factors lead children to understand what is real (or not real) in their world, particularly when children might have no direct relevant experience. ...
FULL STORY (With More Detailed Data): https://scitechdaily.com/is-santa-r...al-figures-from-the-tooth-fairy-to-spongebob/