• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Collective Disappearances (Settlements, Crews, Etc.)

Newfound survivor camp may explain fate of the famed Lost Colony of Roanoke

Pieces of broken crockery recently unearthed in a North Carolina field belonged to survivors of the ill-fated Lost Colony, the first English settlement in the Americas. That dramatic claim has stoked a long-simmering debate over what happened to the 115 men, women, and children abandoned on North Carolina’s Roanoke Island in 1587.

ngm-1806-lost-colony_ai2html-mobile.jpg


Working on a bluff overlooking Albemarle Sound, 50 miles west of Roanoke Island, a team from the First Colony Foundation uncovered a trove of English, German, French, and Spanish pottery pieces.

“The number and variety of artifacts recovered provide compelling evidence that the site was inhabited by several settlers from Sir Walter Raleigh’s vanished 1587 colony,” said archaeologist Nick Luccketti, the team’s leader.

The announcement came just months after another archaeologist claimed to have found objects related to the lost settlers on Hatteras Island, located about 50 miles south of Roanoke Island. If both discoveries hold up, they support the theory that the colonists split up into two or more widely separated survivor camps, almost certainly aided by Native Americans with whom they likely assimilated.

The case went cold until 2012, when researchers noticed a patch on a watercolor map of eastern North Carolina painted by White [ the colony’s governor]. Beneath the patch they found the image of a fort at the head of Albemarle Sound. Its location is 50 miles to the west of Roanoke Island, matching the governor’s account. On top of the patch was another faint outline of a fort, this one drawn in what analysts said was invisible ink.

Scholars speculated that White wanted to hide the existence of the fort from the Spanish, who viewed the Roanoke venture as a threat to their domination of North America and the critical shipping lanes off North Carolina’s Outer Banks. The Spanish sent an expedition to wipe out the rogue colony, but they, too, failed to find the settlers.

In 2015 Luccketti’s team excavated the area marked on the map, close to a Native American village called Mettaquem. Just outside its wall, at a place they called Site X, Luccketti’s team found no fort, but they did uncover two dozen pieces of English pottery that they maintained likely belonged to Lost Colony survivors.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...urvivor-camp-may-explain-lost-colony-roanoke/

maximus otter
 
The thing i dont quite understand is why, on the return trip to Roanoak in1590 did they not search the surrounding islands/land for the missing colonists, surely if they were aware of the Croatoan tribe, after seen the word carved into the tree, that would be the first place they would have looked, is thete any written evidence they did go to Hatteras Island? Or search up river, if as speculated, lookout posts were set up on the river, also it is said that from Hatteras Island you can see ships coming into the river, why didn't the group, if they were on Hatteras Island, make any attempt to signal/contact the ship when it appeared in 1590?

Edited to correct terrible date mistake haha (thanks @gordonrutter)
 
Last edited:
The thing i dont quite understand is why, on the return trip to Roanoak in1890 did they not search the surrounding islands/land for the missing colonists, surely if they were aware of the Croatoan tribe, after seen the word carved into the tree, that would be the first place they would have looked, is thete any written evidence they did go to Hatteras Island? Or search up river, if as speculated, lookout posts were set up on the river, also it is said that from Hatteras Island you can see ships coming into the river, why didn't the group, if they were on Hatteras Island, make any attempt to signal/contact the ship when it appeared in 1890?
Small thing, sure it’s just a typo, but 1590 not 1890.
 
Not sure where to put this; Mods may find a better home for it.

Archaelogists unearthed the remains of a boy experts believe was about 15 years old, and arrived in the Chesapeake region from Europe in 1634 as one of the first permanent white settlers in America. He was found just outside what were once the walls of a fort those settlers made.


Article at The Washington Post.

His leg was broken, and "[h]is right arm was pulled awkwardly across his chest. And his left hand was clenched in a fist."

"The position of his right arm was a puzzle, [Kari Bruwelheide, a biological anthropologist at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History] said. Perhaps he had died facedown with the arm underneath his chest, and whoever buried him didn't, or couldn't, move the arm back to a normal position.
"The smaller bone in his lower right leg, the fibula, was broken. And the larger bone, the tibia, looked cracked or broken, she pointed out.
"He probably broke his leg shortly before he died, although that would not have killed him unless it became infected, Bruwelheide said."

Because he was buried without a coffin, and wasn't even wrapped in a shroud, Bruwelheide believes he had no family, and possibly arrived as a ship's cabin boy or an indentured servant.

https://boingboing.net/2023/05/04/r...f-americas-first-colonists-a-teenage-boy.html
 
Not sure where to put this; Mods may find a better home for it.

Archaelogists unearthed the remains of a boy experts believe was about 15 years old, and arrived in the Chesapeake region from Europe in 1634 as one of the first permanent white settlers in America. He was found just outside what were once the walls of a fort those settlers made.


Article at The Washington Post.

His leg was broken, and "[h]is right arm was pulled awkwardly across his chest. And his left hand was clenched in a fist."



Because he was buried without a coffin, and wasn't even wrapped in a shroud, Bruwelheide believes he had no family, and possibly arrived as a ship's cabin boy or an indentured servant.

https://boingboing.net/2023/05/04/r...f-americas-first-colonists-a-teenage-boy.html
Not even a shroud. Poor lad.
 
Back
Top