Amergin
Foundation and Umpire
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2020
- Messages
- 308
Here is how I see it: Given all the brains that have now been preserved, and the numbers that are adding to this each year, and the incremental improvements in the process, then I think some traces of some of those dead individuals are going to be recovered. It’s an equation that has several factors. Here are some -
1. When you died (1960s preservation is going to yield less intact brain structure than 2060s technology).
2. How quickly you were preserved post-mortem.
3. How you died (neurodegenerative disease is really going to kill the odds)
4. When they decide a technology threshold has been reached that it’s worth trying a recovery. Pity the first few attempts.
1. When you died (1960s preservation is going to yield less intact brain structure than 2060s technology).
2. How quickly you were preserved post-mortem.
3. How you died (neurodegenerative disease is really going to kill the odds)
4. When they decide a technology threshold has been reached that it’s worth trying a recovery. Pity the first few attempts.