David Lynch releasing 51 minutes of lost footage from ‘Blue Velvet’
February 19, 2019
David Lynch is teaming up with The Criterion Collection to release 51 minutes of previously lost footage of his iconic film Blue Velvet.
The film, a 1986 American neo-noir mystery feature starring the likes of Kyle MacLachlan, Isabella Rossellini, Dennis Hopper, and Laura Dern, is Lynch at his brilliant best.
Typically, the film divided opinion upon its release but still wound up earning Lynch his second Academy Award nomination for Best Director and the film ultimately rose to cult fame among his fans.
Now, it has been revealed that Lynch has uncovered 51 minutes of “The Lost Footage” from production which includes a series of deleted scenes and alternate takes.
Yes, that sounds like a very David Lynchy thing to do.
Do I?You’re weird too. I mean just look atcha. You appeal to David Lynch.
That would be... weird.Ask someone. It’s true.
AVC: Some notable filmmakers have returned to their works years later with re-edits, because just as a viewer’s relationship to a piece of art can change over time, so too can a creator’s. Was a new narrative cut something you ever considered with Inland Empire?
DL: No. But Dune—people have said, “Don’t you want to go back and fiddle with Dune?” And I was so depressed and sickened by it, you know? I want to say, I loved everybody that I worked with; they were so fantastic. I loved all the actors; I loved the crew; I loved working in Mexico; I loved everything except that I didn’t have final cut. And I even loved Dino [De Laurentiis], who wouldn’t give me what I wanted [laughs]. And Raffaella, the producer, who was his daughter—I loved her. But the thing was a horrible sadness and failure to me, and if I could go back in I’ve thought, well, maybe I would on that one go back in.
AVC: Really?
DL: Yeah, but I mean, nobody’s…it’s not going to happen.
AVC: Well that’s interesting, because in the past you were always much less open to it.
David Lynch: Yeah, I wanted to walk away. I always say, and it’s true, that with Dune, I sold out before I finished. It’s not like there’s a bunch of gold in the vaults waiting to be cut and put back together. It’s like, early on I knew what Dino wanted and what I could get away with and what I couldn’t. And so I started selling out, and it’s a sad, sad, pathetic, ridiculous story. But I would like to see what is there. I can’t remember, that’s the weird thing [laughs]. I can’t remember. And so it might be interesting—there could be something there. But I don’t think it’s a silk purse. I know it’s a sow’s ear.
It could perhaps do with a bit of enhancement to make it more compatible with present-day screen resolutions.In an interview about Inland Empire's remaster and rerelease, Lynch admits he's finally open to revisiting his Dune footage...
https://www-avclub-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.avclub.com/david-lynch-inland-empire-interview-dune-restoration-1848795394/amp?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIKAGwASCAAgM=#amp_tf=From %1$s&aoh=16500440736718&csi=0&referrer=https://www.google.com&share=https://www.avclub.com/david-lynch-inland-empire-interview-dune-restoration-1848795394
If he re-cut a far longer version, I'd give it a go, CGI or no.It could perhaps do with a bit of enhancement to make it more compatible with present-day screen resolutions.
But, generally, I think it doesn't need to have new CGI stuff added (like they did with the first Star Wars films).
I guess he could add the scenes that had been cut out. The cinematic version was still a long film, which was why it was cut down.If he re-cut a far longer version, I'd give it a go, CGI or no.