Spookdaddy
Cuckoo
- Joined
- May 24, 2006
- Messages
- 7,899
- Location
- Midwich
...The problem is that nice drawings of Bigfoot with a pleasant expression are not ever going to represent hard scientific evidence for the hominid. At the very least we need photographs, film and scat/hair samples to make any progress.
Harvey Pratt appears to be the real deal, but the term forensic artist in this context is open to misinterpretation. Soft tissue post-mortem reconstructions might fall somewhere under the forensic label (albeit at the soft-science end of the spectrum), but this is just art done by someone with experience of forensic art, rather than actual forensic art.