One of the most intriguing and..to me..convincing paranormal phenomenon is the Death Bed Vision...largely involving the dying patient reporting visitations by deceased loved ones, sometimes ones they couldn't even have known were dead, but seemingly never reports of the living, thus largely ruling out mere hallucination or confused memory retrieval (else why so selective?).
When my own mum was at death's door she repeatedly spoke of both my dad and her mum having been in her hospital room usually silently sitting there etc, but never imagined anyone still alive doing so...which made me assume the inevitable, but it never actually happened. 5 years later she's still here and the dead aren't. Which cast some doubt on the neat and literal interpretation for DBVs. But I rationalized it away by speculating that perhaps the dead "draw near" when we're dying but just as automatically pull away again if the physical danger passes.
But tonight, on the reality TV series Long Lost Family, where adoptees and their birth relatives are reunited, there was an extraordinary story which throws yet another intriguing spanner in the works.
A 74 year old man called Ray had never met his birth mother since being given up as a baby. They found his still living 72 year old brother. The mother had died in 1975. The brother casually reports to the TV presenters that he knew his older sibling existed as his mum spoke of him on her death bed. She said a couple of days before passing that Ray had been in to see her and sat at the end of the bed. He asked who Ray was and she told him it was his older brother who'd been given up. She died 2 days later.
Now this fits all the criteria of a deathbed vision...except Ray was clearly not dead! Nor had he physically actually been in to visit her.. he didn't know anything about her. And she presumably hadn't envisioned a baby coming into the room to sit on the bed but a young adult as he would then have been (?)
It seems to me then that either this is a huge fly in the ointment for the DBV narrative..one can and does perceive visits from the living, suggesting they are mere hallucinations after all. OR, can we imagine that Ray, perhaps asleep in his bed, did indeed leave his body and go and visit his dying mother as a ghost might, returning to waking life with nothing but a quickly fading dream, now long forgotten?
To be fair, and depending on the medication, it's perfectly likely that a patient in a hospital will see something that isn't there.Well indeed..but if that's the case it undermines the validity of DBVs generally, as it suggests it is, after all, the most likely explanation for the visiting dead. And that itself if significant.
Although in terms of her perceptions as to what was happening, as told second hand through her other son, the suggestion seemed to be that she perceived him having been in her hospital room, rather than merely was having melancholy what might have been thoughts. That is it was an "hallucination" of some kind, rather than just confused wishful thinking.
To be fair, and depending on the medication, it's perfectly likely that a patient in a hospital will see something that isn't there.
A while back, my father was hospitalised, and given all kinds of drips to balance up this or that chemical in his body. Although superficially coherent, he would occasionally be confused about where he was, or see things that weren't there. It was quite saddening, as all the signs were that he wasn't well at all. I remember one occasion when I visited, when he became convinced that mum was just out of sight behind him, and kept asking me to get her to step forward so he could talk to her. Needless to say, he and I were the only people in his room.
In case you think I'm about to tell a ghostly tale, I should say immediately that my parents are both alive and in pretty reasonable health several years later, and only occasionally talk nonsense!
If any conclusion is to be drawn from this, it's probably that there is no obvious one-size-fits-all meaning to a NDE/DBV, particularly if the "D" doesn't apply!
Oh, i don't dispute that what I saw and heard might be a figment of my imagination. It was utterly convincing to me, however, even if it took me years to come to terms with the experience - that sort of thing just can't happenThe face you saw could be an archetype, ie the Saviour and Guide, that your mind picked up at the time you were ready to believe in something more 'spiritual' or you needed it in your life. If it had made you happier, then, your subconscious did an excellent job.
That is just my opinion.
Well as it fits perfectly the quote in my original post it's exactly the kind of thing i was looking for.