- Joined
- Jan 30, 2008
- Messages
- 4
Some family freinds took this picture last week. Look between the legs, if you will, on the left hand side.
Creepy...
Creepy...
maxwell135 said:It isn't photoshopped, or faked. It has come from a phone, onto my phone then onto here. And I don't believe in ghosts!
And as someone there pointed out, the crying child doesn't appear on the mobile phone pic so it was obviously added, so I'd say the face was too.chewlip said:This photo has been discussed here... http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=117450
It seems to point to fake.
Ronson8 said:Oh come on, the child is clearly not in the mobile picture and no amount of tech speak can change that.
You seem to be an expert on the subject so could you post an enlargement of the mobile picture and point out where the child is?The child is without question in the small image
Ronson8 said:You seem to be an expert on the subject so could you post an enlargement of the mobile picture and point out where the child is?The child is without question in the small image
maxwell135 said:Some family freinds took this picture last week. Look between the legs, if you will, on the left hand side.
http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh22 ... /spook.jpg
Creepy...
So it's a mystery pic one way or another! 8)gyrtrash said:It seems to me that this pic is doing the rounds on the 'net at the moment, and everyone is claiming it to be taken by someone they know... a FOAF-pic!
No, you're the missing crying child!escargot1 said:I am the photographer!
Zilch5 said:The "face" extends way below the curtain, so I think that does rule the simulacrum out.