• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Fungi Communication

EnolaGaia

I knew the job was dangerous when I took it ...
(ACCOUNT RETIRED)
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
29,622
Location
Out of Bounds
Newly published research provides additional clues to the manner in which plants can "signal" each other electrically via a connecting medium such as the soil. This doesn't prove plants "chat", but it adds weight to the notion that there is a reliable communication substrate.

Plants Can Secretly Send Underground Electrical Signals. Here's How They Do It

A new study offers a better understanding of the hidden network of underground electrical signals being transmitted from plant to plant – a network that has previously been shown to use the Mycorrhizal fungi in soil as a sort of electrical circuit.

Through a combination of physical experiments and mathematical models based on differential equations, researchers explored how this electrical signalling works ...

The work builds on previous experiments by the same team looking at how this subterranean messaging service functions, using electrical stimulation as a way of testing how signals are carried even when plants aren't in the same soil.

"We can use the math model for simulating the studied processes on a computer instead of running expensive and lengthy experiments," says electrical engineer Yuri Shtessel from the University of Alabama in Huntsville.

Together with biochemist Alexander Volkov from Oakwood University, Shtessel tested communications between different types of plants in separate pots, both with and without an air gap.

Without an electrical conductor connecting them, the connection was broken. With a silver wire in place, the network was back up and running, which suggests any sort of electrical conductor can be utilised for these plant-to-plant chats.

What's more, the message networks seemed to stay in place and to take a similar form across different types of plant – Aloe vera and cabbage plants were used in the new research, while previous experiments looked at the same kind of signalling between tomato plants. The models suggest different types of plant may be able to communicate in the same way.

"I think that it is definitely possible that signals can propagate through the root network and spread in the common ground or soil from a tomato plant to, let's say, an oak," says Shtessel. "The soil plays the role of a conductor."

While this newest study doesn't reach any firm conclusions about what's being said between plants, or how much of the communication is intentional or not, it does show the potential for messages to be sent about threats to plants, their growth, or plant movement. ...

FULL STORY: https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s...end-each-other-underground-electrical-signals

==
 
Here are the bibliographic details and abstract of the newly-published research cited above.


Alexander G. Volkov & Yuri B. Shtessel (2020)
Underground electrotonic signal transmission between plants
Communicative & Integrative Biology, 13:1, 54-58.

DOI: 10.1080/19420889.2020.1757207

https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/19420889.2020.1757207
ABSTRACT
Plants can communicate with other plants using wireless pathways above and underground. Some examples of these underground communication pathways are: (1) mycorrhizal networks in the soil; (2) the plants’ rhizosphere; (3) acoustic communication; (4) naturally grafting of roots of the same species; (5) signaling chemicals exchange between roots of plants; and (6) electrical signal transmission between plants through the soil. To avoid the possibility of communication between plants using mechanisms (1)–(5), soils in both pots with plants can be connected by Ag/AgCl or platinum wires. Electrostimulation Aloe vera or cabbage plants induces electrotonic potentials transmission in the electro-stimulated plants as well as in the neighboring plants located in the same or different electrically connected pots regardless if plants are the same or different types. The amplitude and sign of electrotonic potentials in both electrostimulated and neighboring plants depend on the amplitude, rise, and fall of the applied voltage. Electrostimulation serves as an important tool for the evaluation of mechanisms of underground communication in the plant-wide web. The previously developed mathematical model of electrotonic potentials transmission within and between tomato plants, which is supported by the experimental data, is generic enough to be used for simulation study and predicting the intercellular and intracellular communication in the form of electrical signals in the electrical networks within and between a variety of plants.
 
Are they actually communicating in any way via this path? I mean most/all life gives off electromagnetic radiation, but that doesn't mean we communicate this way.

I know there is evidence of some communication networks in forests and such, but iirc that is via the plants emitting chemicals.
 
Are they actually communicating in any way via this path? I mean most/all life gives off electromagnetic radiation, but that doesn't mean we communicate this way. ...

I think the point in this research was to demonstrate a natural means for coherent electrical "transmission" between plants. This only goes so far as to establish that there's a "connectivity" as in a network. Whether such transmissions through that network serve to "communicate" anything is a separate issue (at least from what I gather from this study).
 
The earlier research findings cited above refer to fungi's ability to interact via electrical activity. In recently published new research it is now suggested that the fungi themselves may be "communicating", and that their "communications" may exhibit a regularity analogous to a "language."
Fungi May Be Communicating in a Way That Looks Uncannily Like Human Speech

A new study has identified patterns of nerve-like electrical activity being produced by fungi. What's more, patterns within the activity appear to be comparable to similar structures in humans speech.

Assuming the impulses might be influencing other cellular activities in a network of fungi, it's a finding that could shed new light on communication in mycological organisms.

Computer scientist Andrew Adamatzky, from the University of the West of England in the UK, was able to spot up to 50 different 'words' or groups of spikes of activity produced by the fungi networks that were studied.

Electrical buzzes in fungi have been known about for years, but analyzing this activity as if it were a language could stand to reveal many things we don't know about what this fungi phenomena represents.

"Assuming that spikes of electrical activity are used by fungi to communicate and process information in mycelium networks, we group spikes into words and provide a linguistic and information complexity analysis of the fungal spiking activity," writes Adamatzky in his new paper. ...

"We do not know if there is a direct relationship between spiking patterns in fungi and human speech," Adamatzky told the Guardian. "Possibly not. On the other hand, there are many similarities in information processing in living substrates of different classes, families and species. I was just curious to compare."

Although the comparisons with human speech are notable, the research doesn't give any indication of what the fungus network might be communicating, if at all, or why these organisms might need to keep in touch across a wider area.

Considering fungi live rather simple lives, there aren't too many possibilities that come to mind. It's possible that these signals are ways in which mushrooms are able to warn about threats to their survival, or about a change in available resources, for example. ...
FULL STORY: https://www.sciencealert.com/fungi-communicate-with-patterns-that-look-uncannily-like-our-own-speech
 
Here are the bibliographic details and abstract from the published research report. The full report is accessible at the link below.


Adamatzky Andrew 2022
Language of fungi derived from their electrical spiking activity
R. Soc. open sci.
9211926211926
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211926

Abstract
Fungi exhibit oscillations of extracellular electrical potential recorded via differential electrodes inserted into a substrate colonized by mycelium or directly into sporocarps. We analysed electrical activity of ghost fungi (Omphalotus nidiformis), Enoki fungi (Flammulina velutipes), split gill fungi (Schizophyllum commune) and caterpillar fungi (Cordyceps militaris). The spiking characteristics are species specific: a spike duration varies from 1 to 21 h and an amplitude from 0.03 to 2.1 mV. We found that spikes are often clustered into trains. Assuming that spikes of electrical activity are used by fungi to communicate and process information in mycelium networks, we group spikes into words and provide a linguistic and information complexity analysis of the fungal spiking activity. We demonstrate that distributions of fungal word lengths match that of human languages. We also construct algorithmic and Liz-Zempel complexity hierarchies of fungal sentences and show that species S. commune generate the most complex sentences.

SOURCE / FULL REPORT: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.211926
 
Here are the bibliographic details and abstract from the published research report. The full report is accessible at the link below.


Adamatzky Andrew 2022
Language of fungi derived from their electrical spiking activity
R. Soc. open sci.
9211926211926
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211926

Abstract
Fungi exhibit oscillations of extracellular electrical potential recorded via differential electrodes inserted into a substrate colonized by mycelium or directly into sporocarps. We analysed electrical activity of ghost fungi (Omphalotus nidiformis), Enoki fungi (Flammulina velutipes), split gill fungi (Schizophyllum commune) and caterpillar fungi (Cordyceps militaris). The spiking characteristics are species specific: a spike duration varies from 1 to 21 h and an amplitude from 0.03 to 2.1 mV. We found that spikes are often clustered into trains. Assuming that spikes of electrical activity are used by fungi to communicate and process information in mycelium networks, we group spikes into words and provide a linguistic and information complexity analysis of the fungal spiking activity. We demonstrate that distributions of fungal word lengths match that of human languages. We also construct algorithmic and Liz-Zempel complexity hierarchies of fungal sentences and show that species S. commune generate the most complex sentences.

SOURCE / FULL REPORT: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.211926
Interesting idea. I don't see any control conditions there - so a set of wires in the same locality to rule out background noise fluctuations, which can vary by 3-6dB during the day, quietest first thing in the morning for the most part.

They're also tiny signals with unshielded long wires. I'd be more interested if there was some frequency domain analysis.

They ought to get a DSP designer involved on processing the ADC output...and someone who understands small signal measurement techniques.

But, a start.
 
Back
Top