-Oracle- said:Anything with more than six legs is abnormal and should be killed on on sight. Further more, anything that needs more than six legs is also abnormal and should be killed on sight. Even further more, anything that scuttles, runs, bites and is hairy AND has more than six legs should be killed from as far away as possible on sight!
...I'm arachnophobic and will kill any spider that I see, regardless of size and whether or not it is deadly. They simply don't deserve to live!
![]()
SilburyMoon said:Is that otherwise known as a harvestman?
Meanwhile, in darkest south London, there's a common old orb web spider right outside the window next to me at the moment - the roundy bit on it's web measures a whacking 26inches in diameter! (yes, I have just had the tape measure out)
They drive me mad at this time of the year - got 9 webs attached to our 2 washing lines at the moment. Luckily for the spiders tho, it's wet outside so I won't be needing to destroy their homes in order to get my smalls dried![]()
Conners said:Do you get fewer house spiders the higher up you are? This kind of makes sense from a layman's point of view. Just occurred to me last night that I haven't seen any this season, now that I live in a roof.
It's all about context with spiders isn't it?
When I saw a big hairy fella in a tree in Costa Rica, I wasn't scared of it, cos the outdoors seemed to put it in perspective.
But have a little hoos spider pop up next to me on the sofa, and I run a mile.
Lethe said:Also any South American country, because we KNOW there are large spiders there, maybe not dog sized. Is the Goliath Tarantula the largest? And is that the so'called ' Chicken spider ? ' or is that another one?
I had a similar incident when one of the guys at work came into my office and thrust an open glass tank containing two tarantulas into my face, saying 'Look what I found'. I'm not the biggest fan of spiders, and particularly large furry poisonous ones with nothing between me and them...Lethe said:I woke up to find him holding this ' thing ' right in front of my face, and pretty woozy, as I was, I did not, for a moment, register it was displayed in a glass case.
DONKAMELEON~ said:"Surely if the spider was that big then its legs would be relative in size and thus able to support it."
Yes, but in that case its legs would be so large, thick and "un-spidery" that it would be difficult to recognize them AS spider legs.
And:
"But if that's the case then how on earth did dinosaurs walk around?"
On their feet. It's those 100- and 200-foot tall Hollywood dinosaur- LOOKING dinosaurs that walk about eating skyskrapers that are the problem. THEY would fall apart under their own weight.
It's also why those photographs of putative 75-foot tall ancient human skeletons are always fake. A human being that size would REQUIRE legs as big around as mighty oak trees or even farm silos! And shoulders to match, to support the tremendous weight of those tree-thick arms.
Perhaps a better example - you can build a dandy model bridge out of wooden match sticks. But if you use the exact number of boards cut to the exacxt ratios of the match sticks and then use this lumber to build a full-size bridge that bridge is going to fall apart under is own weight, and in very short order.