Yes... if that happens, keep your distance. I hope that man's health didn't suffer."I don't really know what the fuck to do....."
How about not walking through the toxic smoke from the lithium/cobalt battery fire????
there is a reduction in the number of dogs being used .....
Why e-bikes aren't the solution they appear to be:
Yes, that does seem odd.I just couldn't in all coinscience ride something on the public highway which is so skittery and unbalanced. Is he a really bad rider? every time one hand leaves the bars, the whole bike slews in the other direction. WTAF?
I mean, on private land with nobody else or with consenting adults I'd thrash it into next week. But not on public roads!
It'd be a huge engineering feat at a high cost, but they could pump in sea water from the coast (yes, it's a long distance).Utah's Great Salt Lake is predicted to be around 5 years away from becoming just the Great Salt. Then comes the arsenic dust clouds.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/06/us/great-salt-lake-disappearing-drought-climate/index.html
--------------------------------
Without a “dramatic increase” in inflow by 2024, experts warn the lake is set to disappear in the next five years.
“Its disappearance could cause immense damage to Utah’s public health, environment, and economy,” the authors wrote in the report. “The choices we make over the next few months will affect our state and ecosystems throughout the West for decades to come.”
The Great Salt Lake, plagued by excessive water use and a worsening climate crisis, has dropped to record-low levels two years in a row. The lake is now 19 feet below its natural average level and has entered “uncharted territory” after losing 73% of its water and exposing 60% of its lakebed, the report notes.
The Pacific is around 1000km away, and there's a 4,000+ meter mountain range in between. Add in the lake itself being at 1.2km of altitude. It would be crazily ambitious and expensive to do, and wouldn't happen fast enough to prevent the lake from disappearing.It'd be a huge engineering feat at a high cost, but they could pump in sea water from the coast (yes, it's a long distance).
This would at least prevent the toxic dust clouds.
Pffft! Small things. Details.The Pacific is around 1000km away, and there's a 4,000+ meter mountain range in between. Add in the lake itself being at 1.2km of altitude. It would be crazily ambitious and expensive to do, and wouldn't happen fast enough to prevent the lake from disappearing.
Of course, they kept lots of records 'pre-industrial' for global temperatures.There's that phrase being used again.
'On record'.
I guess they'll have to start to using their loaf's?French bakers claim that the cost of electricity has gotten of control that this is forcing the French bakers out of business.
That makes uncomfortable sense C.B., and travelling for eighty miles in contact with the Earth is unusual?Another night last night of tornado warnings making several times this year the southern states have been damaged by severe thunderstorms or tornadoes.
Last night Little Rock, Arkansas was ripped apart by a tornado that traveled 80 miles on the ground.
The traditional “ Tornado Alley “ has moved from the Kansas plains area to the Deep South.
The theory is that climate change has warmed the Gulf of Mexico too warm and hot, moist, unstable air spreads across the southern states.
It gets really scary at times around here.
Oh crumbs.French bakers
Shocker.Ottmar Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, and lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report released in 2007:
“But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore…”
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/n...-admits-we-redistribute-worlds-wealth-climate
maximus otter
Ottmar Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, and lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report released in 2007:
“But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore…”
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/n...-admits-we-redistribute-worlds-wealth-climate
maximus otter
I expect that Ottmar Edenhofer does not own any coal and oil. Just guessing.Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this