- Joined
- Jan 26, 2009
- Messages
- 1,584
But it is possible to 'qualify' as a religion within Smarts model, even if a religion has so little evidence of one or more aspects for it to be considered none existent. TM comes to mind, but at a stretch, it's basis in Hindu scripture does give it a tick in all the boxes. Then there are religions belonging to civilisations that no longer exist, so evidence for them fitting Smarts model is limited to archaeological interpretation, yet we would still define the Inca's has having a religion. Equally, archaeology might find evidence of a ritual aspect, such as an altar, but it's not supported by any evidence of doctrine.
It's a handy framework, but one criticism of the model is that it's definitions are quite broad, (if you're expecting a citation or something, forget it, this is all from the bit of my memory marked 'half a lifetime ago', which doesn't have a C&P option) but the alternative is an almost exhaustive list, which tends to be biased towards a particular viewpoint.
dunno where I've got 9 from though, maybe I should use it in the lottery, divine inspiration maybe?
It's a handy framework, but one criticism of the model is that it's definitions are quite broad, (if you're expecting a citation or something, forget it, this is all from the bit of my memory marked 'half a lifetime ago', which doesn't have a C&P option) but the alternative is an almost exhaustive list, which tends to be biased towards a particular viewpoint.
dunno where I've got 9 from though, maybe I should use it in the lottery, divine inspiration maybe?