• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Graham Hancock (General / Compendium Thread On His Work)

Once again Colavito is not impressed by Hancock's half hour.

This week, Graham Hancock celebrated a recent scientific article announcing that a LiDAR survey demonstrated that two previously known archaeological sites in the Bolivian Amazon were larger than previously known, with extensive pyramid mounds around a ceremonial center. Archaeologists have known for decades that the western Amazon had been home to a large population before the Spanish arrival, and articles about the mounds of these collapsed cultures have appeared at regular intervals since 2000. Hancock describes the mounds as “the remnants of a truly monumental civilization.” However, he is not so thrilled with the dating of the sites to 500-1400 CE and implies that some previous culture must have had still greater civilization in the deeper past: “such a sophisticated civilization – no lesser word will do — does not simply spring up out of nowhere. There must be a background to it, either beneath the earliest platform buildings or in the as-yet unexcavated sites that the LiDAR survey has pinpointed in the surrounding jungle.” We don’t know where this particular culture came from, whether it emerged indigenously or from nearby highlands. Nothing about this suggests a hypothetical Atlantis in 10,500 BCE influenced Amazonian mounds in 1000 CE.

Jason Colavito's Newsletter (email) • Vol. 20 • Issue 23 • June 5 2022 •
Good Ramon, no not Atlantean, just pre-Columbus americans indians. Who needs all this nonsense about Atlantis, aliens. Just some basic math-engineering skills and hard work over time. Why should they have to reach when the answers right before their face. Hancock is a sensationalist with little if any hard science to back his claims to fame. I personally view him as a fraudulent scientific imposter just out for publicity and money. I recall his thinking that head binding was an aliens skull shape, amongst other preposterous claims.
 
Good Ramon, no not Atlantean, just pre-Columbus americans indians. Who needs all this nonsense about Atlantis, aliens. Just some basic math-engineering skills and hard work over time. Why should they have to reach when the answers right before their face. Hancock is a sensationalist with little if any hard science to back his claims to fame. I personally view him as a fraudulent scientific imposter just out for publicity and money. I recall his thinking that head binding was an aliens skull shape, amongst other preposterous claims.
:yeahthat:
 
Back
Top