• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

History Rewritten: Myths Busted & New Truths Uncovered

Speaking from a Liverpool point of view (the second most concentrated site of Luftwaffe bombing outside of London) I must say I agree with the official line.

One third of Liverpools houses were damaged or destroyed. Many civic buildings were seriously damaged, even miles from the docks damage was severe.

Perhaps though, we cannot blame the Nazi's for the destruction. After the war, the government would pay city corporations money for any buildings destroyed during or as a result of the war. This led to many buildings that where partially damaged being pulled down completely - claimed to be beyond repair simply to get the governments money.

This sadly, was the fate of Liverpools Customs House.



http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/mari ... tz/may.asp
 
rjmrjmrjm said:
Perhaps though, we cannot blame the Nazi's for the destruction.
That was a Chic Murray line - traipsing through Glasgow for a documentary, the interviewer spotted a vacant plot of land strewn with rubble and litter, where previously a large pub had stood, and asked Murray if it was a bombsite.

"Och no!" replied Murray "The Luftwaffe would have been far more discerning and accurate. We did that ourselves."

Anyway, Bristol got resolutely thumped too (docks, plane factories, tobacco factories), and most of the old city in the centre, many of the buildings 3-400 years old and some even older were destroyed. Quite a few survived - but post-war were deemed unsafe (in many cases for no good reason) and were quickly demolished to make way for acres of unlovely concrete and a ghastly road system, from which a large number of councillors seemed to benefit more than most :evil: .

It's slowly being restored to some semblance of its former glory, a lot of pedestrianisation, preservation and reclaiming of green space, but the Blitz was definitely a very useful excuse for some barbaric town-planning decisions.
 
Thaurmaturge said:
Plymouth was literally razed to the ground (helped after the war by the council - modernisation!), hence the unlovely city centre. I always supposed that they were after the dockyards, which seems perfectly logical. However, after talking to local people, particularly those that remember the destruction, I have been repeatedly informed that the Luftwaffe were after the historical (and apparently very beautiful) city centre - cultural targets to demoralise the populace.

I seem to remember reading that Hitler had a series of tourist guides about cultural cities in Britain (sorry, really can't remember the name) and he aimed to bomb them all to hit at our cultural heart. I read a bit about it at a museum in Norfolk as it said this was the reason for Norwich being bombed in the war as it wasn't a military target. Coventry and Plymouth would also have had their own guides.

On a slightly different tactic, I met someone in Stratford Upon Avon who claimed Stratford was deliberately missed by the bombers on Hitler's orders as it was/is a site of occult interest and in his invasion plans played a large role. Has anyone else heard of this?
 
Little_grey_lady said:
I seem to remember reading that Hitler had a series of tourist guides about cultural cities in Britain (sorry, really can't remember the name) and he aimed to bomb them all to hit at our cultural heart.

Baedeker.
 
Little_grey_lady said:
I seem to remember reading that Hitler had a series of tourist guides about cultural cities in Britain (sorry, really can't remember the name) and he aimed to bomb them all to hit at our cultural heart.
The Baedeker Blitz or Baedeker raids were a series of Vergeltungsangriffe ("retaliatory raids") by the German air force on English cities in response to the bombing of the erstwhile Hanseatic League city of Lübeck during the night from 28 to 29 March, 1942 during World War II.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baedecker_Blitz
 
Non-fiction writer and blogger for School Library Journal Marc Aronson celebrates historical revisionism today; apparently unaware of the association of the term specifically with Holocaust deniers, and professionally excited about the possibilities of new methods of uncovering history without relying on what happened to be written down:

We Are In the Great Days of Revisionism, and What a Thrill That Is
November 5, 2009
Did you all catch the article in the Times about new views of the Battle of Agincourt? tinyurl.com/ykg235l If you, or your school, teaches Henry V part one this is a great article to circ, because the whole "Band of Brothers" image of the vastly outnumbered plucky English against the arrogant, aristocratic, French has come under question. I'm no Early Modern or military history expert, and the article makes clear that there are competing views, some still see the battle as Shakespeare did. But what is wonderful about this piece is it shows how our views of the past are changing. In this case, because of detailed archival work -- instead of building up a sense of the past only, or mainly, from written accounts (thus generally by men attached in some way to power -- the church, the nobility, a king) we can now use layer on layer of social history documentation to at least broadly sketch out the character and experience of the poorer masses. That is not a news flash for anyone who took college history, but to see an application of that approach that may shift our entire view of a cannonical (and literary) moment like the Battle of Agincourt is a thrill we really need to share with colleagues.
"Revisionism" -- of which this is an example -- has a negative tinge. The term is used by scholars, but in general parlance it carries some unhappy associations -- a sense that things used to be OK and now some outside agitators are mucking around, removing foundations, changing things. There is a hint of lefty special pleading -- the idea that an old solid narrative is being hijacked by people with special interests. I even hear a kind of Catholic anti-Protestantism in the term -- the idea that these revisors are jettisoning centuries of authority and imposing themselves on ancient truth. I wish the term did not have all of these associations because we are actually in a glorious moment of revisionism -- not just because of the wonderful way numbers-crunching digital tools enable us to extract social history from dusty records, but also because of the new way a global view of the past is changing everything we thought we knew about national histories. A great example of that is this review in the current New York Review of Books, tinyurl.com/yloozue The great American historian Bernard Bailyn writes about a new view of 1688, the Glorious Revolution, by Steve Pincus.
Folks you may not know or care much about 1688, but please read the review. You see history changing before your eyes. This is going on all over the academy, and, as Bailyn says, because of the global links everyone is making. So friends we need to be ambassadors -- there is a whole lot of shaking going on in the academy, not secular, interest-driven, special pleading, but expansive new views that make textbooks look like sleeping pills, and -- if young people knew about them -- could give them the sense that this is the moment to study the past, because we are making it our own -- finding it to have been as global as we are now. What an exciting moment to read, study, learn, and write history.

Link: http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/blog/1880000388/post/350050235.html
 
Little_grey_lady said:
On a slightly different tactic, I met someone in Stratford Upon Avon who claimed Stratford was deliberately missed by the bombers on Hitler's orders as it was/is a site of occult interest and in his invasion plans played a large role. Has anyone else heard of this?

Utter bollocks, Stratford has no strategic value full stop, unless you count the selling of ice creams to tourists. There would be no reason to waste fuel, bombs or risk planes flattening a few houses. They had more important targets. Most towns that weren't pulverised have a myth that Hitler had personally ordered it spared, but it's more down to luck and simple logistics - the Luftwaffe didn't have unlimited planes but did have a tight schedule, and also Fighter Command preventing them having air superiority.

It's also utter bollocks that Hitler was an occultist. He had no time for any of that nonsense and often openly mocked Himmler, who was the one dreaming about Teutonic Knights and magick rituals.

Regarding the bombing of Coventry, I know an old guy who lived through it as a boy. He maintains that the Luftwaffe couldn't miss Coventry because the moon had illuminated canals, they simply followed the nice bright white lines.
 
LordRsmacker said:
Little_grey_lady said:
On a slightly different tactic, I met someone in Stratford Upon Avon who claimed Stratford was deliberately missed by the bombers on Hitler's orders as it was/is a site of occult interest and in his invasion plans played a large role. Has anyone else heard of this?

Utter bollocks, Stratford has no strategic value full stop, unless you count the selling of ice creams to tourists. There would be no reason to waste fuel, bombs or risk planes flattening a few houses. They had more important targets. Most towns that weren't pulverised have a myth that Hitler had personally ordered it spared, but it's more down to luck and simple logistics - the Luftwaffe didn't have unlimited planes but did have a tight schedule, and also Fighter Command preventing them having air superiority.

It's also utter bollocks that Hitler was an occultist. He had no time for any of that nonsense and often openly mocked Himmler, who was the one dreaming about Teutonic Knights and magick rituals.

Regarding the bombing of Coventry, I know an old guy who lived through it as a boy. He maintains that the Luftwaffe couldn't miss Coventry because the moon had illuminated canals, they simply followed the nice bright white lines.
Could we have a little bit more politeness and respect paid to other Posters when replying to fairly innocent Posts and queries?

If Posters wish to reply to, or refute, the Posts of others, it would also be nice if they could climb off their high hobby horse, long enough to provide some evidence, or references, to back up their counter arguments.

Hitler may well have found the occult contemptible, however, there's no doubt that the Nazi party manipulated its symbolism and drew on a great deal of pagan myth and belief for its rationale and raison d'être. Making up new stuff in the process.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_and_soil
http://www.shoaheducation.com/blut.html

Most mainstream historians find little truth in the many claims for Hitler's occult background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialism_and_Occultism

Nonetheless, the rumours persist and an industry has grown up round them. Since the Fortean raison d'être is the examination of such odd rumours, myths and legends, perhaps Posters could treat such anecdotal tales and their Posters, with a little bit more respect?

It does have to be said, that Stratford Upon Avon is very small, somewhere three-quarters of the way between London and Birmingham and I doubt most German bomber crews could have found it if they had wanted to.

Perhaps, Hitler and Göring made the same mistake that American tourists make occasionally and thought that Shakespeare had actually been born in Stratford-East London? That might even explain some of the excessive bombing that took place there during the Blitz.
 
Pietro_Mercurios said:
Could we have a little bit more politeness and respect paid to other Posters when replying to fairly innocent Posts and queries?

If Posters wish to reply to, or refute, the Posts of others, it would also be nice if they could climb off their high hobby horse, long enough to provide some evidence, or references, to back up their counter arguments.

There was no disrespect meant towards Little_grey_lady. It's the little-known facts and the seeds they plant in our minds that make lots of subjects so interesting in a Fortean vein, make us look at things from another angle. However, those subjects often get clouded beyond comprehension by lots of random, unsubstantiated nuggets thrown in along the way. Or "utter bollocks" as I prefer to call them. Not contemptible "utter bollocks", nor :roll: "utter bollocks", just common or garden utter bollocks. My apologies if I caused offence.

As for providing evidence, I see the irony behind your use of Wikipedia, very good!
In 25 years studying the 3rd Reich and the Second World War, nearly, oh so nearly pursuing a professional career in doing so (before opting for safer financial territory), I've amassed many many boxes of original paperwork, interviews, photographs, maps, slides (remember them?), microfiches (which I have no way of viewing!), not to mention a sizeable collection of militaria. I've waded through countless books dissecting life and politics of the times (and I don't mean the "Hitler's Evil Empire"-type nonsense), I have worked with respected historians (not weekend warriors like myself) who are still poring over archived paperwork not seen since 1945, have boxes of unrelated stuff myself which lies untranslated (and if I'm honest, probably never will be, until I donate it, I guess), and NEVER have I come across anything regarding occult reasons to spare Stratford. It's not a case of providing evidence for a rebuttal, more a case of asking for some substance behind the proferred theory.

I'll admit to not being a particularly in-depth scholar of Luftwaffe tactics and operational data, I suppose it might be in there somewhere, a secret order to preserve Shakespeare's hometown, but I'm pretty sure that it would be at least a more widely held belief after this amount of time.

Similarly with the myth of Hitler's occult beliefs, this has been dismissed by serious historians so comprehensively so as to be not worth wasting time and effort providing references. A bit like say, having a discussion on discovering the real life and times of Jesus Christ (man or legend?) and wasting time and effort dismissing Dan Brown's contribution of "fact" to the story . It tires you after a while and is beneath serious debate!

That said, however, it is interesting how we are constantly fed images of Hitler "the monster", rather than Hitler "the bad MAN" (to put it mildly, I suppose). It suits our purpose to think of the great Christian Allies on our white horse vanquishing the evil Satanic Anti-christ of Nazi Germany, that we battled for truth and good against the forces of darkness. I've said it before on many occasions, until we see the Fuhrer as just a very bad man, we'll never learn lessons from the horrors of that war. It was a war between men, some of whom on both sides were not very nice people (ie. "evil"), not a supernatural confrontation.

I suppose this is how legends begin, in hundreds of years people may look back on WW2 as I fear - a desperate battle betwen Good and Evil, ignited by the Devil Incarnate, not man-made disagreements escalated through treaties and territorial concerns.

This lets us off the hook today, no need to look back at WW2 and learn from it, learn to settle disputes before they escalate into conflagrations, that war was Divine, it was an unavoidable clash between Good and Evil. Next stop Tehran.

Pietro_Mercurios said:
That might even explain some of the excessive bombing that took place there during the Blitz.
Oh, and this.......now this is Utter Bollocks, right? :lol:
 
shows how historians can disagree about history, and how any 'answers' given may only be partial explanations.

According to my ww2 veteran next door neighbour, coventry had the living crap bombed out of it because the germans mistook it for London. He thought that Churchill had purposely allowed this to continue while it took the heat off of the capital for a while.

This comes with the caveat that he does have a tall tale or two up his sleeve!
 
BlackRiverFalls said:
shows how historians can disagree about history, and how any 'answers' given may only be partial explanations.

According to my ww2 veteran next door neighbour, coventry had the living crap bombed out of it because the germans mistook it for London. He thought that Churchill had purposely allowed this to continue while it took the heat off of the capital for a while.

This comes with the caveat that he does have a tall tale or two up his sleeve!
I think it's more likely that Coventry got flattened, because the West Midlands was a not only a major centre for the motor and aircraft industry, but also for the manufacture of machine tools, at the time. ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry
 
BlackRiverFalls said:
According to my ww2 veteran next door neighbour, coventry had the living crap bombed out of it because the germans mistook it for London. He thought that Churchill had purposely allowed this to continue while it took the heat off of the capital for a while.
This idea may derive from the story that Churchill knew about the planned German raids because of secret intelligence reports, but felt he had to allow the raids to happen at that time to avoid letting the Germans know we had broken their secret codes.
 
rynner2 said:
This idea may derive from the story that Churchill knew about the planned German raids because of secret intelligence reports, but felt he had to allow the raids to happen at that time to avoid letting the Germans know we had broken their secret codes.

I always thought that this must have been one of the most terrible burdens of leadership in WW2. It's also a basic paradox in codebreaking - you need to break a code in order to protect yourself - but it's no protection if the enemy knows their code is broken.
 
Adolf Hitler thought Jewish doctor poisoned his mother
Adolf Hitler’s hatred of Jews stemmed from the mistaken belief that his mother was poisoned by a Jewish doctor, according to a new book.
Published: 8:30AM GMT 07 Dec 2009

Hitler’s mother Klara had breast cancer but died as a result of poisoning from the idoform which was given to her by Dr Eduard Bloch. The use of idoform as a treatment for breast cancer was a standard medical practice when she died in 1907 at the age of 47.

The future dictator was 18 at the time and the author of the book, Joachim Riecker, said “her painful death was a key moment in his [Hitler’s] development”.

“Hitler never forgave the Jewish doctor. In conversations with aides such as Josef Goebbels he referred to the Jews as being like TB and himself as a ‘healer’ who had to stamp it, and consequently them, out,” he said.

The arguments in the book, called November 9: How World War One Led To The Holocaust, contradict other views that Hitler respected and liked Dr Bloch, even helping him to emigrate from Austria to the US in 1940.

Mr Riecker views November 9 as a key date for Hitler. On that day of the year, the Weimar Republic was set up in 1918, Hitler staged an attempted coup in 1923 and the Kristallnacht pogrom against Jews happened in 1938.

Dr Bloch died in June 1945 at the age of 73, outliving Hitler by a month.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/6746587 ... other.html
 
About £50'll buy you a slide/negative converter so you can put your pictures onto your pooter. :D

I have one sitting here, waiting for me to begin the mammoth task of tackling my huge mountain of slides. ;)
 
Boy Scout founder Lord Baden-Powell 'executed PoW'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/engl ... 403956.stm

Baden-Powell founded the Scouting movement in 1907

Documents suggesting that Boy Scout founder Lord Baden-Powell illegally executed a prisoner-of-war have been sold for £3,740.

Papers relating to the Second Matabele War in 1896 say Baden-Powell, then a Colonel in the British Army, ordered the shooting of an African chief.

The chief, Uwini, had been promised his life would be spared if he surrendered.

The papers reached double their expected price at auction in South Cerney, Gloucestershire.

An inquiry at the time of the conflict into the affair exonerated Baden-Powell.

'Old school tie'

However, the inquiry papers, which were originally owned by his commanding officer, Sir Frederick Carrington, make it clear that the future scouting leader knew Uwini had been promised safe conduct.

Baden-Powell said he took action to save lives and because his commander was too distant to consult.

Uwini led a rebellion by Africans against white settlement in what is now Zimbabwe.

Auctioneer Chris Albury said: "The character witness statements give a strong sense of the old school tie network banding together and making Baden-Powell a hero rather than a villain."

Robin Clay, Baden-Powell's grandson, told The Times newspaper: "We all make mistakes. In time of war emotions are aroused and you do what you think at the time."
 
Can you still get a badge for Extrajudicial Killing? Or was that the one they replaced with Cookery?
 
ramonmercado said:
Baden-Powell said he took action to save lives and because his commander was too distant to consult.

That's the kind of initiative that won the Empire!
 
Hero British soldier ‘honoured 65 years after saving child’s life from live grenade’
A British soldier who for more than 60 years was believed to have died after “fooling around” with a hand grenade during World War Two, is to be honoured by a French town after it emerged that he died saving children from the live ammunition.
By Andrew Hough
Published: 8:00AM GMT 12 Dec 2009

Bombardier Robert Key, 30, was killed during the 1944 grenade explosion in France in an incident many believed was caused by him “showing off”.

An inquiry into the anti-tank regiment soldier’s death also concluded he had been killed due to his foolishness, a statement that still remains on his service record.

But his relatives have now discovered he in fact died trying to save a child in the north-east French town of Annezin.

Officials in the French town where he was stationed are to honour the soldiers’ bravery on the 65th anniversary of his death in September next year, by naming a road after him on the spot where he died.

French officials have re-examined accounts from witnesses and discovered that he was killed after intervening to save a boy who had picked the grenade up.

Bdr Key snatched the primed grenade from the unnamed child, smothering the bomb in his jacket, and ran off with it. Moments later he died instantly when it exploded.

His relatives, from Coventry, West Mids, said they were delighted he was now being honoured as hero.

"It was absolutely amazing to find out that the locals in Annezin actually class Robert as a hero,” said his niece Gill Mills, 54.

“As a soldier you expect him to die in battle and not because of a silly child messing around.”

“But we are so proud of his actions and glad his courage has finally been revealed.”

She called for his service record to be changed.

The former miner, born in County Durham, joined the Army in 1934 aged 21 with his brother John Key, 23.

He fought in various battles, including Dunkirk, before being sent to Annezin as a bombardier with the Royal artillery in 1944.

French officials said that during a routine patrol through the town the day after Liberation Day Bdr Key spotted a group of children who had crowded around a live grenade in a farmer's field.

He rushed over, grabbed the grenade from one, cradled it in his jacket, but as he dashed away from the group it exploded, causing him to die instantly.

During the subsequent military inquiry, his “foolish behaviour” was blamed for his death.

No other troops were present during the accident and it appeared the army failed to properly translate the witness statements from local residents.

Bdr Key, who never married or had children, left five siblings.

A Ministry of Defence spokesman said while it was impossible to change his file the family could ensure he was still recognised.

"If Mr Key's family write to us asking for a permanent letter to be put in his file, recognising what he did we can do that," he said.

More than a dozen of his relatives will make the trip next year.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... enade.html
 
Post deleted 'cos it was in the wrong thread. :oops:
 
Long article. The subject is still disputed, so expect more rewrites on this one!

Historian claims to have finally identified wartime 'Man Who Never Was'
A historian claims to have conclusively proved the identity of the "Man Who Never Was", whose body was used in a spectacular plot to deceive the Germans over the invasion of Sicily in the Second World War, Ian Johnston reports.
Published: 7:30AM GMT 03 Jan 2010

It was a turning point in the Second World War. As the Allies prepared to invade Sicily in 1943, they wanted to dupe the Germans into thinking that their attack would be aimed elsewhere.

To carry out the deception, a plan was concocted in which a body was dumped in the sea, to be discovered by Axis forces, carrying fake 'secret documents' suggesting the invasion would be staged in Greece, 500 miles away.

Incredibly, the trick worked and the diversion of German troops to Greece has been credited by historians with playing a major part in the success of the Sicily invasion. The episode was later immortalised in the 1956 film The Man Who Never Was.

Yet to this day, just whose body was used in "Operation Mincemeat" has remained a source of secrecy, confusion and conspiracy theory.

In a forthcoming book, a historian claims to have finally established beyond any reasonable doubt the identity of the person who 'played' the part of the dead man: a homeless Welshman called Glyndwr Michael.

The body, which was given the identity of a fake Royal Marine called 'Major William Martin', was dropped into the sea off Spain in 1943.

Winston Churchill had remarked that "Anyone but a bloody fool would know it was Sicily", but after the tides carried Major Martin's body into the clutches of Nazi agents, Hitler and his High Command became convinced Greece was the target. "You can forget about Sicily. We know it's in Greece," proclaimed General Alfred Jodl, head of the German supreme command operations staff.

"Mincemeat swallowed, rod, line and sinker" was the message sent to Churchill after the Allies learned the plot had worked.

etc...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... r-Was.html
 
Relic reveals Noah's ark was circular
• Newly translated tablet gives building instructions
• Amateur historian's find was almost overlooked
Maev Kennedy guardian.co.uk, Friday 1 January 2010 22.35 GMT

That they processed aboard the enormous floating wildlife collection two-by-two is well known. Less familiar, however, is the possibility that the animals Noah shepherded on to his ark then went round and round inside.

According to newly translated instructions inscribed in ancient Babylonian on a clay tablet telling the story of the ark, the vessel that saved one virtuous man, his family and the animals from god's watery wrath was not the pointy-prowed craft of popular imagination but rather a giant circular reed raft.

The now battered tablet, aged about 3,700 years, was found somewhere in the Middle East by Leonard Simmons, a largely self-educated Londoner who indulged his passion for history while serving in the RAF from 1945 to 1948.

The relic was passed to his son Douglas, who took it to one of the few people in the world who could read it as easily as the back of a cornflakes box; he gave it to Irving Finkel, a British Museum expert, who translated its 60 lines of neat cuneiform script.

There are dozens of ancient tablets that have been found which describe the flood story but Finkel says this one is the first to describe the vessel's shape.

"In all the images ever made people assumed the ark was, in effect, an ocean-going boat, with a pointed stem and stern for riding the waves – so that is how they portrayed it," said Finkel. "But the ark didn't have to go anywhere, it just had to float, and the instructions are for a type of craft which they knew very well. It's still sometimes used in Iran and Iraq today, a type of round coracle which they would have known exactly how to use to transport animals across a river or floods."

Finkel's research throws light on the familiar Mesopotamian story, which became the account in Genesis, in the Old Testament, of Noah and the ark that saved his menagerie from the waters which drowned every other living thing on earth.

In his translation, the god who has decided to spare one just man speaks to Atram-Hasis, a Sumerian king who lived before the flood and who is the Noah figure in earlier versions of the ark story. "Wall, wall! Reed wall, reed wall! Atram-Hasis, pay heed to my advice, that you may live forever! Destroy your house, build a boat; despise possessions And save life! Draw out the boat that you will built with a circular design; Let its length and breadth be the same."

The tablet goes on to command the use of plaited palm fibre, waterproofed with bitumen, before the construction of cabins for the people and wild animals.

It ends with the dramatic command of Atram-Hasis to the unfortunate boat builder whom he leaves behind to meet his fate, about sealing up the door once everyone else is safely inside: "When I shall have gone into the boat, Caulk the frame of the door!"

Fortunes were spent in the 19th century by biblical archaeology enthusiasts in hunts for evidence of Noah's flood. The Mesopotamian flood myth was incorporated into the great poetic epic Gilgamesh, and Finkel, curator of the recent British Museum exhibition on ancient Babylon, believes that it was during the Babylonian captivity that the exiled Jews learned the story, brought it home with them, and incorporated it into the Old Testament.

Despite its unique status, Simmons' tablet – which has been dated to around 1,700 BC and is only a few centuries younger than the oldest known account – was very nearly overlooked.

"When my dad eventually came home, he shipped a whole tea chest of this kind of stuff home – seals, tablets, bits of pottery," said Douglas. "He would have picked them up in bazaars, or when people knew he was interested in this sort of thing, they would have brought them to him and earned a few bob."

Simmons senior became a scenery worker at the BBC, but kept up his love of history, and was very disappointed when academics dismissed treasures of his as commonplace and worthless. His son took the tablet to a British Museum open day, where Finkel "took one look at it and nearly fell off his chair" with excitement.

"It is the most extraordinary thing," Simmons said of the tablet. "You hold it in your hand, and you instantly get a feeling that you are directly connected to a very ancient past – and it gives you a shiver down your spine." 8)

Raiders of the lost ark
The human fascination with the flood and the whereabouts of the ark shows few signs of subsiding.

The story has travelled down the centuries from the ancient Babylonians and continues to fascinate in the 21st century.

Countless expeditions have travelled to Mount Ararat in Turkey, where Noah's ark is said to have come to rest, but scientific proof of its existence has yet to be found.

Recent efforts to find it have been led by creationists, who are keen to exhibit it as evidence of the literal truth of the Bible.

"If the flood of Noah indeed wiped out the entire human race and its civilization, as the Bible teaches, then the ark constitutes the one remaining major link to the pre-flood world," says John D Morris of the Institute for Creation Research.
"No significant artefact could ever be of greater antiquity or importance."

In the Victorian era some became obsessed with the ark story. George Smith – the lowly British museum assistant who, in 1872, deciphered the Flood Tablet which is inscribed with the Assyrian version of the Noah's ark tale – could apparently not contain his excitement at his discovery. :shock:

According to the museum's archives: "He jumped up and rushed about the room in a great state of excitement and to the astonishment of those present began to undress himself." :shock:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/0 ... s-circular
 
Agent Knopf’s legacy is helping to shed light on the wartime work of MI6
Paul Winter: Commentary

Archival research is like mining for gold or precious stones: long shifts sifting tons of material in the hope that one or two nuggets of historical importance will be unearthed. It was while mining the rich seams at the Churchill Archives Centre, Cambridge, and the National Archives at Kew, that the first, and as yet only, documentary gems citing Agent Knopf and his fellow spies were discovered by this author.

These discoveries proved not only that Britain had agents within the German High Command, they also overturned 60 years of received wisdom. Since the end of the war historians have assumed that the greatest secrets of the German war machine were divined through the decryption of the Enigma codes at Bletchley Park, and not through the efforts of high-level agents in Hitler’s high command.

Robert Cecil, a former personal assistant to the Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), popularly known as MI6, lamented that the focus on the Enigma story had relegated Humint (human intelligence) to insignificance. “This hardly does justice to the [wartime] role of MI6,” he complained.

By far the greatest obstacle to a better understanding of the role of wartime agents such as Knopf is MI6 itself. Wedded to a policy of non-disclosure with regard to its records, the service has, in contrast to its sister organisations, MI5 and GCHQ, remained quiet about its past achievements.

Rightly citing the need to protect the identities of its agents and informants, the SIS has on occasion reaffirmed its determination to remain “secret”. In 1998 Robin Cook, then Foreign Secretary, declared in Parliament that, “the Secret Intelligence Service ... must remain secret ... Their effectiveness and their lives depend on their identities and work remaining out of the public eye”.

In December 2005, a slight relaxation of this policy took place when it was announced that an official history of the service covering the years 1909 to 1949 would be published in 2010. Yet, almost in the same breath, the public was told that there were no plans to release SIS material in the foreseeable future.

The significance of Agent Knopf, therefore, goes beyond a chance discovery in the archives. Seventy years after passing on the secrets of Hitler’s Germany, Knopf, or rather the documentary spoors he left behind, is finally revealing the truth about the long-hidden wartime work of MI6.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 025671.ece
 
Fabricated quote used to discredit climate scientist
Sir John Houghton, who played a critical role in establishing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC), was roundly condemned after it emerged that he was an apparent advocate of scary propaganda to frighten the public into believing the dangers of global warming.

"Unless we announce disasters, no one will listen," Sir John was supposed to have said in 1994.

The quotation has since become the iconic smoking gun of the climate sceptic community. The words are the very first to appear in the "manual" of climate denialism written by the journalist and arch-sceptic Christopher Booker. They get more than a 100,000 hits on Google, and are wheeled out almost every time a climate sceptic has a point to make, the last occasion being in a Sunday newspaper article last weekend written by the social anthropologist and climate sceptic Benny Peiser.

The trouble is, Sir John Houghton has never said what he is quoted as saying. The words do not appear in his own book on global warming, first published in 1994, despite statements to the contrary. In fact, he denies emphatically that he ever said it at any time, either verbally or in writing.

In fact, his view on the matter of generating scare stories to publicise climate change is quite the opposite. "There are those who will say 'unless we announce disasters, no one will listen', but I'm not one of them," Sir John told The Independent.

The Independent
 
New book claims Robin Hood stole from the rich and lent to the poor
A new book has claimed that Robin Hood was not as selfless as he is often depicted, suggesting he stole from the rich and lent money to the poor as an early kind of loan shark.
By Roya Nikkhah, Arts Correspondent
Published: 9:00PM GMT 06 Mar 2010

By stealing from the rich and giving to the poor, Robin Hood gained legendary status as a selfless re-distributor of wealth.

But a new book claims that the outlaw of Sherwood Forest was in fact something of a loan shark, who operated a sophisticated lending scheme for those short of cash.

Robin Hood: The Unknown Templar, points to several passages in an old English ballad that depict Robin loaning £400 to an impoverished knight.

The claim threatens to tarnish the image of a hero of English folklore who has been played on screen by actors including Errol Flynn and Kevin Costner, and who even has even has an airport, in Doncaster, named after him.

John Paul Davis, the author of the new book, cites scenes from A Gest of Robyn Hode, one of the earliest references to Robin Hood which dates from the 1500s, to support his theory.

In the ballad, Robin is approached by a knight who is indebted to an abbot and asked for a loan. Robin asks the knight if he has a guarantor, then agrees to give him the money, to be repaid over a year.

He asks Little John to count out £400 from his treasury.

Later in the ballad, which is written in Middle English, the knight returns to see Robin, and with his debts to the abbot cleared, offers to repay the loan together with an extra deposit charge.

Robin, however, declines the repayment, saying he has already received the money after stealing it from the abbot himself as a punishment for his greed, and tells the knight that it would be wrong to take the money twice.

Mr Davis also claims in the book that Robin was a member of the Knights Templar, a powerful Christian military organisations of the Middle Ages.

He argues that during the period, the sort of banking transaction described in the ballad was the preserve of the Templars alone, who were known to charge deposit fees as usury was officially forbidden by the Church.

Mr Davis, said: "The Templars were the most famous moneylenders in the world and £400 was a vast sum of money, which hints at an organisation behind the loan rather than the act of a lone outlaw.

"Although the information we have for Robin Hood is pretty scant, he is always described as an astute swordsman and soldier, with a notable devotion to Christianity who took a vow, along with his merry men, of honouring and protecting women, all of which were Templar codes.

"The idea that he was a money lender may not fit with the traditional image of Robin Hood, but he is still shown to be a good outlaw giving his money around."

etc...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/book ... -poor.html
 
History rewritten - but this time it's a personal history with an ironic twist:

Sir Paul Nurse: Geneticist inherits a mystery
Nobel Laureate Sir Paul Nurse talks for the first time about the search for his father.
By Roger Highfield
Published: 11:48PM BST 19 Apr 2010

We all know that the Americans are picky to the point of paranoia about whom they allow into their country, but when he applied for a Green Card, Sir Paul Nurse had no reason to suspect that he would be deemed an undesirable.

The Nobel Prize-winning geneticist had not only lived in America for three years, but is president of Rockefeller University New York – a powerhouse of American research, so when his application was turned down by the Department of Homeland Security, he assumed that it was nothing more than a bureaucratic blip. "I know they have high standards," he joked, "but this is ridiculous."

The problem was that the details on Sir Paul's birth certificate did not carry the names of his parents. Mildly indignant, but still unconcerned, he applied for a fuller version from Britain's General Register Office and went on holiday.

When he returned, his secretary said that, yes, she had the longer certificate, but, no, she still hadn't submitted his Green Card paperwork. Had he made a mistake about the name of his mother? "Don't be ridiculous," he said. Then she handed him the document.

"The next few seconds were both unexpected and transforming," he recalls.

"The name of my mother given on the certificate was the name of the person I thought was my sister and the space for my father's name was just a dash. No father."

There was no escaping the irony: here was one of the country's most eminent geneticists and he couldn't even be sure of his own genetic identity. :shock:

At first, he was slow to grasp the implications of the newly issued birth certificate. It took his wife to put two and two together: his parents were probably his grandparents, and they had brought him up as their own. Could it have been to protect their daughter, his "sister", from some scandal?

As a boy, Paul had always felt "a little bit different" from his siblings, all three of whom had left school at 15. He, on the other hand, moved on to university, won a scholarship, did a doctorate. He became director-general of Cancer Research UK, was knighted in 1999 and two years later shared the Nobel Prize for medicine for his work on the genetics of cell division, before moving to America to take over at Rockefeller University. There was also something oddly exotic about his middle name – "Maxime" – given that his mother was a cook and cleaner and his father a handyman, chauffeur and mechanic. Perhaps he was descended from a French or Russian aristocrat? It was a thought that he admits to finding a bit unsettling.

Now, however, he knows why he felt so different: he had been fooled about his family history. The loving parents who had given him a happy childhood in the Fifties and Sixties in Wembley were in fact his grandparents. They, too, were illegitimate, which his grandmother had only revealed when his own daughter, then 11, had tried up draw up a family tree.

It seemed too late to take the story any further, or to find out about his father, because both his "parents" and his birth mother – his "sister", Miriam – were long dead. Then Sir Paul, then 57 (now 61), noticed that the birth certificate said he had been born in his great-aunt's house in Norwich. He rang her daughter and she told him how, as an 11-year-old, she had been sworn to secrecy about his birth.

"She was able to tell me that my mother became pregnant at 17 and was sent away to her aunt's for the last months of pregnancy and my birth. It was like something out of a Dickens novel. My grandmother then came and pretended that she was the mother and returned to the family home with her 'new' son. My grandparents brought me up to protect their daughter."

Though all the certainties in his life have been thrown into confusion, Sir Paul is treating his cloudy ancestry more in the spirit of a Who Do You Think You Are?-style quest than as a blow to his identity. Even so, this is the first time that he has spoken directly to the press about how he has gradually unmade the fictitious jigsaw of his life and put the pieces together to form the real picture.

etc...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/7607 ... stery.html
 
How Britannia came to rule the waves
History has it that a clockmaker beat the scientific establishment to crack the longitude problem. But did he really?
By Steve Connor, Science Editor
Friday, 14 May 2010

Hero worship at the expense of historical accuracy? Surely not. It has been portrayed as the story of the lone genius who solved the greatest scientific problem of his day despite the hindering efforts of those ranged against him, saving thousands of lives.

On the one side was John Harrison, the self-taught clockmaker from a humble Yorkshire background. On the other, the 18th Century’s wealthy elite charged with the task of presiding over the problem of longitude – the knotty task of working out how far west or east a ship has sailed.

Harrison’s story has been the subject of a best-selling book and an award-winning film but science historians believe that the true account of how the problem of longitude was solved has yet to be told.

To uncover the full story, they have started dusting off the forgotten archives of the British Board of Longitude, the panel of distinguished experts set up in 1714 to sit in judgement over proposed solutions to the Longitude Problem. The Board was responsible for awarding the £20,000 prize – equivalent to about £3m today – to the first person to come up with a way for ships to navigate safely at sea by knowing longitude.

“Think of The X Factor, but much more money and much more important,” said Professor Simon Schaffer of the University of Cambridge. He is the principle investigator on the archival research project which is being jointly conducted with the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich. The prize was the first time the government had used legislation to address a specific scientific problem.

In Dava Sobel’s 1995 book Longitude, and the later film based on it, carpenter’s son Harrison is depicted as the solitary virtuoso pitched against the scientific establishment of a society suffocated by class, exemplified by the eminent gentlemen who sat on the Board of Longitude.

But Professor Schaffer and his colleagues believe that the important role of the Board of Longitude in finding a solution has been largely forgotten or downplayed in the rush to promote Harrison as the unsung hero of the popular story. Far from being a force of conservatism, the board, they believe, did much to generate the climate of open inquiry that allowed pioneering scientific research to flourish – a climate that fostered Harrison’s historic achievement.

“The Board of Longitude has had a pretty bad history because it has either been forgotten or condemned. Its creation was a turning point in British history, but after it was abolished in 1828 it was largely forgotten and its impact was never properly assessed,” Professor Schaffer said.

Indeed, Professor Schaffer goes as far as to suggest that British science today owes the Board a debt of gratitude rather than contempt, because in effect it laid much of the groundwork for the kind of state-funded scientific research that we now take for granted. The precedent of the Board of Longitude may indeed have led Britain to become one of the global leaders of modern science.

“It has been forgotten, I think, because we don’t like remembering how important the state is in promoting science and technology in British history. And we ignore or condemn the Board of Longitude because there is a hero in this story and his name is John Harrison.”

He added: “We still like to believe that we are a nation of enthusiastic amateurs like Harrison, making huge breakthroughs against the odds and in spite of a state hostile to scientific progress. In fact, we have a long history of state-sponsored ingenuity which made Britain into a military and technological world player. The Board is in many ways that history.”

...

As part of the new investigation into the archives of the Board of Longitude, experts will also dismantle the chronometers made by Harrison in pursuit of the prize. Richard Dunn, curator of the history of navigation at the National Maritime Museum, said that it is clear from earlier work on some of the prototypes that Harrison was not working alone.

“One of the things we will be doing is taking apart the timekeepers Harrison made, which can give us an alternative version of the story. If you look inside the first clock, it quickly becomes clear that several people were involved in making it. Clearly this wasn’t just about a lone genius working by himself,” Mr Dunn said.

etc...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 73025.html
 
Texas schools board rewrites US history with lessons promoting God and guns
US Christian conservatives drop references to slave trade and sideline Thomas Jefferson who backed church-state separation
Chris McGreal, Houston guardian.co.uk, Sunday 16 May 2010 17.19 BST

Cynthia Dunbar does not have a high regard for her local schools. She has called them unconstitutional, tyrannical and tools of perversion. The conservative Texas lawyer has even likened sending children to her state's schools to "throwing them in to the enemy's flames". Her hostility runs so deep that she educated her own offspring at home and at private Christian establishments.

Now Dunbar is on the brink of fulfilling a promise to change all that, or at least point Texas schools toward salvation. She is one of a clutch of Christian evangelists and social conservatives who have grasped control of the state's education board. This week they are expected to force through a new curriculum that is likely to shift what millions of American schoolchildren far beyond Texas learn about their history.

The board is to vote on a sweeping purge of alleged liberal bias in Texas school textbooks in favour of what Dunbar says really matters: a belief in America as a nation chosen by God as a beacon to the world, and free enterprise as the cornerstone of liberty and democracy.

"We are fighting for our children's education and our nation's future," Dunbar said. "In Texas we have certain statutory obligations to promote patriotism and to promote the free enterprise system. There seems to have been a move away from a patriotic ideology. There seems to be a denial that this was a nation founded under God. We had to go back and make some corrections."

Those corrections have prompted a blizzard of accusations of rewriting history and indoctrinating children by promoting rightwing views on religion, economics and guns while diminishing the science of evolution, the civil rights movement and the horrors of slavery.

Several changes include sidelining Thomas Jefferson, who favoured separation of church and state, while introducing a new focus on the "significant contributions" of pro-slavery Confederate leaders during the civil war.

The new curriculum asserts that "the right to keep and bear arms" is an important element of a democratic society. Study of Sir Isaac Newton is dropped in favour of examining scientific advances through military technology. :evil:

There is also a suggestion that the anti-communist witch-hunt by Senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950s may have been justified.

The education board has dropped references to the slave trade in favour of calling it the more innocuous "Atlantic triangular trade", and recasts the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as driven by Islamic fundamentalism.

"There is a battle for the soul of education," said Mavis Knight, a liberal member of the Texas education board. "They're trying to indoctrinate with American exceptionalism, the Christian founding of this country, the free enterprise system. There are strands where the free enterprise system fits appropriately but they have stretched the concept of the free enterprise system back to medieval times. The president of the Texas historical association could not find any documentation to support the stretching of the free enterprise system to ancient times but it made no difference."

The curriculum has alarmed liberals across the country in part because Texas buys millions of text books every year, giving it considerable sway over what publishers print. By some estimates, all but a handful of American states rely on text books written to meet the Texas curriculum. The California legislature is considering a bill that would bar them from being used in the state's schools.

In the past four years, Christian conservatives have won almost half the seats on the Texas education board and can rely on other Republicans for support on most issues. They previously tried to require science teachers to address the "strengths and weaknesses" in the theory of evolution – a move critics regard as a back door to teaching creationism – but failed. They have had more success in tackling history and social studies.

etc...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/ma ... us-history
 
Back
Top