• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Jack The Ripper's Identity Finally Uncovered?

maximus otter

Recovering policeman
Joined
Aug 9, 2001
Messages
13,970
An historian has claimed to have discovered the real identity of Jack the Ripper, and believes the notorious Whitechapel murderer was also responsible for killing two more women.

Mei Trow used modern police forensic techniques, including psychological and geographical profiling, to identify Robert Mann, a morgue attendant, as the killer.

His theory, the result of two years intensive research, is explored in a Discovery Channel documentary, Jack the Ripper: Killer Revealed.

Trow's research is rooted in information from a 1988 FBI examination of the Ripper case, which had worked up a comprehensive criminal personality profile.

The portrait drawn up of Jack was as a white male from the lower social classes, most likely the product of a broken home.

It was also thought he would have had a menial job but with some anatomical knowledge, something like a butcher, mortuary or medical examiner's assistant or hospital attendant.

Because of prolonged periods without human interaction, Jack would also have been socially inept

It is known that Mann was from an extremely deprived background. His father was absent for much of his upbringing and he had spent some time as a child in a workhouse.

Trow said: "I wanted to go beyond the myth of a caped man with a top hat and knife, and get to the reality, and the reality is simply that Jack was an ordinary man."

Trow makes another startling conjecture, that the Ripper killed another two women.

He believes Martha Tabram, found with 39 stab wounds to her body in Gunthorpe Street, was the first of Jack's victims, and Alice Mackenzie, brutally murdered eight months after the confirmed five killings, was his last.

The two women, along with Polly Nichols and Annie Chapman, would have been delivered to the Whitechapel mortuary in which Robert Mann worked.

After the killing of Polly Nichols, Jack's first recognised victim, Mann unlocked the mortuary for the police so they could examine the body and as such, was called as a witness in her inquest to help establish the cause of death.

Most damningly, he undressed Polly's body with his assistant, despite being under strict instructions from Inspector Spratling to not touch the body, and Trow suspects that this was an opportunity to admire his handiwork.

The Coroner, in his summation of Robert Mann's testimony, concluded that, "It appears the mortuary-keeper is subject to fits, and neither his memory nor statements are reliable."

Professor Laurence Alison, Forensic Psychologist at Liverpool University, who features in the documentary, said: "In terms of psychological profiling, Robert Mann is the one of the most credible suspects from recent years and the closest we may ever get to a plausible psychological explanation for these most infamous of Victorian murders."

Trow's is the latest in a long line of theories about who Jack the Ripper was. More than 100 suspects have been proposed over the years, including a member of the royal family, a doctor and even the artist Walter Sickert.

JACK THE RIPPER: KILLER REVEALED will be aired on the Discovery Channel on Sunday October 11 at 9pm. The accompanying book, Jack the Ripper: Quest for a Killer, is published by Pen & Sword.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/6261360/Jack-the-Rippers-identity-finally-uncovered.html

maximus otter
 
It's got more behind it than some... but not as much as others. I'm not Ripperologist but i'd be quite interested in a critique of this theory.
 
Did it imply that morgue attendants are social inepts or was it referring to Mann's childhood?

These fits? Did the man have epilepsy or did the coroner mean he was a shifty liar? I wish I had access to these satellite channels.
 
As I'm sure someone else said in one of the big Ripper threads, at this rate, wouldn't it be easier to just list the people it couldn't have been?

Queen Victoria, Gilbert & Sullivan, Good Old John Marston, etc?
 
stuneville said:
As I'm sure someone else said in one of the big Ripper threads, at this rate, wouldn't it be easier to just list the people it couldn't have been?

Queen Victoria, Gilbert & Sullivan, Good Old John Marston, etc?

But it could have been Queen Victoria. Those palaces had lots of secret entrances. All she had to do was withdraw to her rooms and no one would dare to disturb her as she was in mourning. Then off she would go down the secret passage & slash away to her hearts content. John Brown would have assisted her
 
I could have been Gilbert and Sullivan, they would've been rehearsing Yeoman of the Guard at the Savoy about them and could have covered for each other as one or other of they popped out to commit a murder...

And their previous operetta had been Ruddygore (it was subsequently bowlderized to Ruddigore)..
 
Alright, alright.

Prepare yourselves for my forthcoming blockbuster - "Jack the Ripper: It Could Have Been Bloody Anyone With The Possible Exception Of Good Old John Marston".

Perhaps it wasn't Masonic at all but a series of installations by progressive aesthetes of the day?

Wilde: But I've never butchered a prostitute!

Whistler: You will, Oscar, you will.
 
It was Obama! Sad to say, I'm sure there are some folks who might actually believe that. :(
 
Jack The Ripper was, of course, a Reptoid.
He learnt his chops in the Medical Corp of the Quilopian Fleet.

...and, someone whose existence is unverifiable claims to have heard him shouting at women in the street in the months leading up to the murders.

Conclusive.

As Quilopians live to around 700, i suggest we dust of the extradition treaty secretly signed between George III and his cousin Zzlegi Emperor of Quilop Prime.
 
I have just started reading The Five by Hallie Rubenhold.

In the introduction she explains that the victims were laid down when murdered. She also explains that none of the five victims had money for accommodation on the night they were murdered. Hence, it looks like all five were murdered while they were sleeping rough.

I have little knowledge of Jack the Ripper as such, but just wondered if these possibilities change anything.
 
I have just started reading The Five by Hallie Rubenhold.

In the introduction she explains that the victims were laid down when murdered. She also explains that none of the five victims had money for accommodation on the night they were murdered. Hence, it looks like all five were murdered while they were sleeping rough.

I have little knowledge of Jack the Ripper as such, but just wondered if these possibilities change anything.

What I've generally seen of the medical reports and their interpretations suggest that JTR would subdue victims by some kind of either manual or ligature strangulation, to render them unconscious. He would then lay them down and set about the rest.

I've not seen much to indicate that they would have been unconscious (asleep) when he attacked them.

I've not read Rubenhold's book, though intend to shortly, and I understand she has exhaustively researched their lives. However, I'm also given to understand that she does not go deeply into their deaths, or uncovers anything not previously known about their respective demises.

Of the five canonical victims, MJK was the only one found indoors, and the only one at the time of the murders who had her own room.

The others were all drifting between temporary accommodations, etc.

In fact, I believe it was Annie Chapman who was turned out of police custody giving assurances that she would soon have her "doss money".
 
Generally accepted variant is Jill.

First postulated before the end of the Nineteenth Century, if memory serves.
 
Back
Top