It's hard to tell from the picture but there has been more than one case where people have called these "ball lightning" but they are almost certainly reflections of interior vehicle lights. Both are much more plausible than the alien headline the media trots out.Western Australian Police release possible UFO footage:
'It appears we may not be alone': Police release eerie footage of a UFO-like object hovering in the sky during an intense thunderstorm in Australia's remote northwest
It's hard to tell from the picture but there has been more than one case where people have called these "ball lightning" but they are almost certainly reflections of interior vehicle lights. Both are much more plausible than the alien headline the media trots out.
Edit: I was able to see the video. A reliable acquaintance who researchers UFO media opines that this is "a lens flare caused by the car's reversing lights that you can see on the bottom right corner. Indeed the alleged UFO and the reversing lights have synchronized movements compared to the center of the image."
Aren't the triads usually Chinese people?
I finally caught a UFO outside my back door. I was so excited. My husband was quick to grab the binoculars and see that it was a paper bag with a candle tied to a balloon and it immediately went out. Ye old Chinese Lantern.
Some are very small! Those repeatedly travelling up the sides of missiles during tests at White Sands (and on at least one occasion --through the missile exhaust, then up the side and leaving the missile behind as they flew off into space) were only about 20 inches across; same with the disc that flew right at a military jet, stopped abruptly, turned on edge and flipped over his wing and then flew over the jet, in the Historic Articles thread. We should start thinking of these things as "devices" not all are the type we think of when we think of "flying saucers".Too small to be a flying saucer.
It's possible that they are drones. Alien drones.Some are very small! Those repeatedly travelling up the sides of missiles during tests at White Sands (and on at least one occasion --through the missile exhaust, then up the side and leaving the missile behind as they flew off into space) were only about 20 inches across; same with the disc that flew right at a military jet, stopped abruptly, turned on edge and flipped over his wing and then flew over the jet, in the Historic Articles thread. We should start thinking of these things as "devices" not all are the type we think of when we think of "flying saucers".
Exactly! Agreed.It's possible that they are drones. Alien drones.
Don't know if folks have seen the Utah footage making the rounds now..
This has got to be, by far, the best alleged UFO/UAP footage that I have ever seen.!Our resident sceptics seem strangely quiet about it. Do they not realise that there's a party balloon here that has been left unburst?
Bird, drone, fake? Lots of explanations before UFOs come into it. I feel flying saucers should be the last thing you use to explain these things, the margin for error is just too great.
Which seems a valid point..it’s the amount of frames inserted that is the red flag. If it’s actually traveling as fast as it is, when it passed the camera, it should have been in much less frames than what was actually captured or inserted.
With my sceptical trousers on, the first suspicion these days has to be CGI. It's speculated to be travelling between 9000 - 12000 mph. An 'object' should produce many sonic booms at that speed. ...
Sorry- I don't usually read this thread, because it is too full of fakes.This has got to be, by far, the best alleged UFO/UAP footage that I have ever seen.!Our resident sceptics seem strangely quiet about it. Do they not realise that there's a party balloon here that has been left unburst?
Strangely enough, this is how Kenneth Arnold claimed to have established the distance to his formation of UAPs way back in 1947. He said that the objects passed behind a ridge, allowing him to determine that they were big, and far away. It is much more likely that he simply lost sight of them for a second or two, because of contrast effects. Just as in this case.The claim of remarkable speed is predicated on the object being only intermittently visible early on. This discontinuous visibility is optimistically explained in terms of the object being obscured by a ridge line a few miles distant. In turn, this claimed distance is the basis for attributing extraordinary speed.