I wonder if those photos will ever turn up, or will they get conveniently 'lost?'When two aircrews witnessed the same UFO:
Not sure how he can draw such a conclusion from a brain scan.Professor Gary Nolan of Stanford University says that scans of pilots brains prove aliens have visited earth.
More from The Sun.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/22443092/scientist-garry-nolan-fighter-pilots-ufos-aliens-earth/
Here's a previous thread about this chap.Professor Gary Nolan of Stanford University says that scans of pilots brains prove aliens have visited earth.
Before we get too carried away with this hypothesis, Nolan only managed to find two people with this pre-existing condition, out of a sample of 100 witnesses. Few scientists would erect a working theory on such meagre evidence.
Perhaps more importantly - he didn't report any subject for whom a prior MRI demonstrated "normal" caudate nucleus / putamen status in their past generally, much less some past point preceding any UFO (etc.) encounter.
These flares were being tested at a significant distance from the base, beyond the mountains - the men were in no danger. Flares, even infrared flares, can be seen for many kilometres.The DoD pushed the idea of weapons testing which is strange because weapons testing would not be near the men at the base?
Well, you can see the flares drift apart over time if you compare the photos taken during the event. The flares move significantly with respect to one another, demonstrating that they are not all fixed to a single craft.Do flares stay together or drift apart ?
Flares of the same type do. But in this event there are two different types of flare, and the ones that mostly emit visible light are significantly brighter than the ones which mostly emit infra-red light.Do flares all have the same brightness ?
Because they were launched at different times? Probably from helicopters or aircraft too far away to be audible. These flares were likely about 10km from the witnesses, if not more.Why some flares might light up a minute or two later ?
The Marines were presumably not familiar with this kind of flare. They would be familiar with ground-launched flares or perhaps decoy flares, as opposed to long-duration aircraft-dropped flares.Over 50 Marines told Corball and Knapp they knew what flares looked like, and this was a UFO.
I believe we have always known that.Helena claims that sheep in Wales are not safe !
*bump*I am by no means saying that this footage is a flying saucer.
However I sometimes despair at rational explanations. I do not think these were flares or fireworks. Flares do not stay in formation and fireworks are usually advertised and consist of a lot of banging or it would be bloomin' boring.
They are certainly not lights from cars, where does that even come from? My car hasn't got a dimmer switch as of yet but these lights do not come on and off but seem to fluctuate/dim.
A lightshow is possible but I don't think it was from a festival without the teen knowing about it, again people would have known of it and the music would have been audible at that distance.
Fakery yes, that is a definite possibility and of course the kites seem at first an answer; even though from what I have seen, they are fitted with on off lights rather than pulsating irregular lights.
So yeah, some good ideas and some that are just as silly as the notion of a UFO.
Has anyone noticed that the teen in the movie scratches his nose and sometimes displays behaviour associated with 'not telling the entire truth?'
Maybe they really thought it was weird at first but then found out what it was?
Indeed. Clearly something is taking place and the young children are simply reacting to what they see. But making claims of extraterrestrials and cover-ups from some intriguing lights captured from inside a bedroom during heavy rain at 3am...? I feel a few more down-to earth explanations need to be discounted before we can get to that stage...Just looking at the footage I see something that looks almost pyrotechnic; there are little 'explosions' that fade away to the right of the frame.
Seeing as there was poor weather at the time, did anyone check if there were power lines in the area the UFO was seen? I could imagine electrical arcing would give an effect a bit like that (with the dark 'disc' an optical illusion due to the 'airship effect').
Some trees were later felled at this location, which is presented as a part of the 'cover-up' but was more likely the power company or landowner as they were interfering with the power line during high windsThe other thing that strikes me is that lining up the video frame with a daytime shot of the skyline shows that the lights are not so much 'airborne' as among the trees along the crest of the hill, and indeed are slightly higher on the right, much as the hill itself is. I suspect this is something on the ground, rather than airborne.
From the road at coordinates 53.1941058, -3.4374386 you can see a power line of some kind running up a small farm track towards the wooded hill the witnesses were looking at. I think they could maybe have been looking at arcing on this power line, given the stormy conditions.
Some trees were later felled at this location, which is presented as a part of the 'cover-up' but was ore likely the power company or landowner as they were interfering with the power line during high winds
Oddly, the view of that path up the hill doesn't show that any trees are growing there, or that any had been removed (i.e. tree stumps, google map shows optional views back to 2009) but also, any Idea what this is? It's the circular image on the ground at the point just above the end of the trackway at the top to the right . . .Some trees were later felled at this location, which is presented as a part of the 'cover-up' but was more likely the power company or landowner as they were interfering with the power line during high winds