• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Contaminating Other Worlds With Earth Organisms

AMPHIARAUS

Gone But Not Forgotten
(ACCOUNT RETIRED)
Joined
Jun 2, 2003
Messages
491
Mr_Eamcat2 said:
Here's a thought - sorry if it's been touched on before:

Surely by landing on another planet/moon we contaminate it?

If we left bacteria behind when we first landed on the moon, or first roamed/dumped down on mars, with no competition (assuming it could thrive in the environment) couldn't we be fooled by our own mistakes?

Someone more knowledgable will no doubt know for sure, but I think all the early moon probes and all mars probes so far are/were fully steralized to prevent contamination.

Later moon probes were not steralized and I think that one of the manned missions retreived parts of a probe and it was found to have bacteria living inside a coaxial cable, which was impressive considering how long it had sat on the surface exposed to cold, radiation and so on.

Just shows how tenacious simple organisms are.
 
"Just shows how tenacious simple organisms are."

As a simple organism, I take that as a compliment.

:)
 
DNA 'can survive re-entry into Earth's atmosphere'
Scientists who attached small double strands of DNA to the outer casing of a rocket discovered it could survive temperatures soaring to more than 1,000 degrees Celsius
By Keith Perry
4:36PM GMT 26 Nov 2014

DNA can survive re-entry into the atmosphere, raising the possibility of extraterrestrial life molecules arriving on Earth from space, research has shown.

The discovery came as a total surprise to scientists who attached small double strands of DNA to the outer casing of a rocket.
Despite temperatures soaring to more than 1,000 degrees Celsius during the short flight to sub-orbital space and back, much of the DNA emerged intact.

Up to 53 per cent was recovered from the grooves in screw heads and more than a third remained fully functional.
The ''plasmid'' DNA carried genes for fluorescence and antibiotic resistance.

Dr Cora Thiel, one of the scientists from the University of Zurich in Switzerland, said: ''We were completely surprised to find so much intact and functionally active DNA.''

Colleague Professor Oliver Ullrich, from the same university, said: ''This study provides experimental evidence that the DNA's genetic information is essentially capable of surviving the extreme conditions of space and the re-entry into Earth's dense atmosphere.'' ...

The research suggested that scientists conducting space missions to other planets needed to be careful about contamination, researchers said.

Prof Ullrich said: ''The results show that it is by no means unlikely that, despite all the safety precautions, space ships could also carry terrestrial DNA to their landing site.

''We need to have this under control in the search for extraterrestrial life.''


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... phere.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This Scientific American blog essay by an astrobiologist suggests we shouldn't be too worried about the tardigrades deposited on the moon by an Israeli probe's failed landing attempt. He thinks there's a decent chance they aren't the first of their species to land there.

Tardigrades Were Already on the Moon
It may not be smart to add more, but nature probably beat us to it anyway

The last few days a number of headlines have pointed to a previously obscure fact about a recent attempt at placing a lander on the Moon by the non-profit Israeli SpaceIL organization. That mission, which unfortunately failed to softly deposit a lander called Beresheet on the lunar surface on April 11th 2019, seems to have been carrying a set of thousands of dehydrated tardigrades as passengers. ...

Now though, the spectre of ‘deliberate’ biocontamination of the Moon is getting some scrutiny. Tardigrades, the tiny 'water-bears', are extraordinarily resilient lifeforms. For a field like astrobiology, looking for life beyond the Earth, one of the biggest challenges in our solar system is to avoid creating false-positives by allowing terrestrial biomarkers or actual organisms into alien environments, whether the Moon, Mars or elsewhere. There is also a sensible consensus that we don’t want to mess up any alien ecosystems – especially if they might be delicate and vulnerable to invasive life.

Since the dawn of the space age there have been internationally vetted protocols and broad agreements about this kind of planetary protection. But it is a tricky business. We know that our efforts to sterilize spacecraft are imperfect, and we know that human spacefarers are an enormous potential cross-contamination problem. On the Moon there are already about 100 baggies of, well, astronaut poop, from the Apollo landings. And if the far-flung ambitions of SpaceX are ever realized we will see hundreds, perhaps thousands, of microbe-oozing humans deposited on the surface of Mars.

None of this appears helpful when seen through the lens of astrobiology’s search for other life. But at the same time, we know that nature has been busy cross-contaminating worlds for the past 4 billion years. And hardy little critters like tardigrades have likely already been deposited far beyond the Earth.

The mechanism involves asteroid impacts and so-called impact ejecta. A large literature exists on both theoretical and experimental work tracking the possibilities. The bottom line is that largish asteroid impacts (i.e. roughly 1-kilometer diameter objects and up) tend to spall (shedding of surface material) stuff from a planet and eject some of it with escape velocity or higher. Furthermore, it appears that microbial life and tough organisms like tardigrades have a decent chance of withstanding the pressure and temperature extremes during these shockingly violent launches.

Big impacts can send billions of cm-scale chunks from the surface of the Earth out across the solar system. Some of those pieces may take thousands of years to drop onto other planetary bodies, wending their way through an unseen web of orbital pathways, but they will get there. Indeed, computer modeling of impact ejecta suggest that even far flung places like Titan around Saturn should – albeit rarely – be recipients of pieces of Earth over time. Places like Mars, or the Moon, get far more detritus.

From the point of view of seeking clues to the deep history of life on Earth, this kind of lithopanspermia is fascinating. It may well be that scattered across the surface of the Moon are fossil-like samples taken sporadically throughout life’s terrestrial history. It is also possible that there are samples, even if millions of years old, that contain naturally dehydrated animals like the tardigrade. It is also, of course, possible (albeit with an unknown probability) that there is a happy ecosystem on Mars populated by descendants of terrestrial life.

SOURCE: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/life-unbounded/tardigrades-were-already-on-the-moon/
 
We don't want to spread life to Mars (or other planets) accidentally or bring critters home but are the rules too strict?

Some policies for protecting the moon, Mars and other places in the solar system from contamination by visiting missions may be too strict.

That’s the conclusion of a 12-expert panel commissioned by NASA to review voluntary international guidelines for keeping space missions from polluting other worlds with earthly life, and vice versa. These guidelines are recommendations from the international scientific organization COSPAR, which for decades has set and revised policies for spacefaring nations (SN: 1/10/18).

With NASA sending a sample-collection mission to Mars next year (SN: 11/19/18), and other government agencies and private companies also preparing for trips to the moon (SN: 11/11/18), planetary protection guidelines “are in urgent need of updating,” said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, in a teleconference coinciding with the review’s October 18 release. “We want to respect the integrity of the places we go and protect our home planet” from any contaminants that might be brought back, he says. But the report found that current rules could make future missions unnecessarily complex or expensive.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/nasa-rules-guarding-other-planets-contamination-may-be-too-strict
 
Maybe life but not as we know it?

Liquid brine can hang around on Mars’ surface, a new study suggests, but conditions may not be great for life as we know it.

That’s bad news for any Earth-based microorganisms determined to colonize the Red Planet, but good news for humans who don’t want to contaminate Mars with microbes hitching a ride on robot explorers.

Pure liquid water can’t last on Mars’ frigid surface. But mix in some salts, and H2O might stick around for a bit. NASA’s Curiosity and Phoenix landers have detected salts known as perchlorates in the Martian soil, and researchers have suggested that such salts might make transient brines possible (SN: 3/20/09).

No salty liquid water has been definitively found on Mars. But there have been hints of water dribbling out from underground (SN: 9/28/15), and a controversial report of a buried lake near the Red Planet’s south pole (SN: 12/17/18).

To learn more about how brines would behave in contemporary Martian conditions, Edgard Rivera-Valentín, a planetary scientist at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, and colleagues ran computer simulations.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/mars-water-liquid-salty-brine-simulation-cold-life
 
New research from ISS experience indicates some terrestrial microbes could survive a trip to Mars (e.g., "hitchhiking" on a space probe or manned mission).
We Just Got More Evidence Bacteria Could Survive The Journey Between Earth And Mars

... Samples of a highly resistant bacterium genus called Deinococcus, which can be found high up in our atmosphere, has officially survived three years in the vacuum of space - withstanding microgravity, intense ultraviolet radiation and extreme temperatures whilst riding on the outside of the International Space Station. ...

Judging by the level of decay shown on the samples, especially on the surface, researchers predict that a pellet a single millimetre thick could have survived up to eight years in outer space. At minimum, maybe three.

"The results suggest that radioresistant Deinococcus could survive during the travel from Earth to Mars and vice versa, which is several months or years in the shortest orbit," says biologist Akihiko Yamagishi from Tokyo University.

Previous research by the same team showed this was possible in the lab, but this is the first time bacteria has tested both inside and outside the ISS. ...

FULL STORY: https://www.sciencealert.com/bacter...ourney-between-earth-and-mars-iss-study-finds
 
New research from ISS experience indicates some terrestrial microbes could survive a trip to Mars (e.g., "hitchhiking" on a space probe or manned mission).


FULL STORY: https://www.sciencealert.com/bacter...ourney-between-earth-and-mars-iss-study-finds

If a manned mission goes to Mars then terrestrial bacteria will go with the crew. Either the faecal waste is dumped on the surface in plastic bags, like on the Moon with the Apollo missions, or it gets used to grow potatoes.
 
Newly reported research suggests terrestrial microbes could temporarily survive on Mars.
Study Shows Life From Earth Could Temporarily Survive on Mars

Some microbes on Earth could temporarily survive on the surface of Mars, finds a new study by NASA and German Aerospace Center scientists. The researchers tested the endurance of microorganisms to Martian conditions by launching them into the Earth’s stratosphere, as it closely represents key conditions on the Red Planet. Published in Frontiers in Microbiology, this work paves the way for understanding not only the threat of microbes to space missions, but also the opportunities for resource independence from Earth.

“We successfully tested a new way of exposing bacteria and fungi to Mars-like conditions by using a scientific balloon to fly our experimental equipment up to Earth’s stratosphere,” reports Marta Filipa Cortesão, joint first author of this study from the German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany. “Some microbes, in particular spores from the black mold fungus, were able to survive the trip, even when exposed to very high UV radiation.” ...

Understanding the endurance of microbes to space travel is vital for the success of future missions. When searching for extra-terrestrial life, we need to be sure that anything we discover has not just traveled with us from Earth. ...

FULL STORY: https://scitechdaily.com/study-shows-life-from-earth-could-temporarily-survive-on-mars/
 
I watched a thoroughly riveting 2 hour National Geographic documentary on the Mars 2020 Perseverance mission. They spent a lot of time talking about how "clean" the rover has to be and the extraordinary lengths they go to in order to not contaminate Mars and to not contaminate the samples they are drilling. I was fascinated by the process. Each individual component, joint and fixture is hand cleaned with a cotton swab by a person wearing two layers of protective clothing, sterile goggles and in the cleanest room ever built by man.

One interesting thing stated by the chief engineer in charge of the project was that the Rover will be the cleanest thing ever sent into space but also that the tubes used to collect the samples will be the cleanest things ever manufactured on Earth. This lead to problems as metals interact differently when they are so clean, a problem never encountered before as no-one had ever made things so clean before.
 
I watched a thoroughly riveting 2 hour National Geographic documentary on the Mars 2020 Perseverance mission. They spent a lot of time talking about how "clean" the rover has to be and the extraordinary lengths they go to in order to not contaminate Mars and to not contaminate the samples they are drilling. I was fascinated by the process. Each individual component, joint and fixture is hand cleaned with a cotton swab by a person wearing two layers of protective clothing, sterile goggles and in the cleanest room ever built by man.

One interesting thing stated by the chief engineer in charge of the project was that the Rover will be the cleanest thing ever sent into space but also that the tubes used to collect the samples will be the cleanest things ever manufactured on Earth. This lead to problems as metals interact differently when they are so clean, a problem never encountered before as no-one had ever made things so clean before.
Although if the earth had not been 'contaminated' with elements from elsewhere in the universe life would not exist at all.
 
The mere thought of such cleanness fills me with mucky dismay!

I wont be going near their rover...
 
Who knows, maybe someone dropped a mucky rover onto Earth 4.2 billion years ago... And here we are.
 
Back
Top