Is it merely an illusion that I'm always way behind everyone else? There are worse things than being a wee bit slow on the uptake tho.
This is a great thread to read through carefully - I came to it via David Raven's pages, cited again for anyone just reading the last msg!
http://www.davidraven.net/
I don't know where to start, this sets off so many hares. Initial thoughts however:
a) literature (broadest sense) sweep on dobbie legends to find parallels and analogies (and possibly homologies LOL).
b) in depth going through local myths legends etc.
c) use of the ADS (and perhaps some of the other data services) at
http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/ to get a full(er) picture of the landscape, adding in David's excellent work in the field. There is now a cross catalogue search
http://ahds.ac.uk/collections/index.htm
d) exploration of the available aerial photographs. ADS doesn't hold them, does anyone have access to eg the cambridge archives? I think this is in the coverage offered by the commercial company
http://www2.getmapping.com/home.asp but have never used them and it costs.
e) in the field an accurate survey of the spread as it is now would be fairly easy if we had the gps stuff, even if it had to be co-ordinated from the slope on the other side of the valley
Anyone done any of the phone tracking stuff for example? resolution? Or an EDM and logger? where could we borrow from? any local educational places or scout troops looking for projects?
f) in the field some sort of geophysical survey might enable comparison between this scree, other scree and non scree slopes, hoping to pick up any disturbance.
Thoughts in no especial order. Def not in a helpful order.
Plotting of the outline through time would give an idea of how fast this particular slope shifts. It is stable? over what period?renewed naturally? artificially?
Is the rock the same as surrounding screes? or... I don't know, a higher proportion of a size which would encourage stability, or maybe of a different colour which might sugggest human selection at some point.
We need to see the thing from where it was "meant" to be seen from. Wherever that is.... <dimple> sideviews are notoriously deceptive and maybe this turns into the parthenon frieze if you get the angle right? rectify the photos, plot the survey...
We know there is intervisibility between the site and the sea. We don't know what the site looks like from the sea or how wide an angle you can see it from. Is it distinctive or just all a grey scree slope at that distance... A GIS would answer this (but a boat trip would be more fun) as long as we include all the usual provisos of minor blocking features etc etc etc.
ramble ramble ramble... Kath:blah: