Miscellaneous Ghost Photos & Videos

These pictures were taken last night at a disused R.A.F. hospital in Lincolnshire by my friend and not at an old asylum as he's written. He wrote this early this morning and we've visited a few asylums recently so he's obviously got muddled up. I'm fond of the forth and seventh images.

aGotsyghost001.jpg


aGotsyghost002.jpg


aGotsyghost003.jpg


aGotsyghost004.jpg


aGotsyghost005.jpg


aGotsyghost006.jpg
aGotsyghost008.jpg
 
Unfortunately this is a story about a ghost photo. It would have been great to see the photo.

Ghost Photo​

In 1991,I was employed at a locally owned, low-power TV station. One of the secretaries was a mid-50s lady. One day, my interest in such things came up with another co-worker. She overheard us talking and mentioned she had a photo of a ghost.

I was very intrigued and asked the story behind it. She looked at me and said, "Young fellow, it's best if you see the photo first, and then I'll tell you about the day it happened. I'll bring it to work with me tomorrow."

I said, "You got a date!"

The next day, I worked the 3 to 11 shift. I worked in the control room, inserting the commercials into the shows. She walked in and laid the picture on the desk in front of me.

"Before you say anything," she said, "just look at it for a minute."

I did. It was your standard old-school pharmacy 35mm color film print. What I saw was a man standing on the second-floor balcony of a house. He was not blurry or grainy or any of the other common tropes you see in alleged ghost photos. It was just a white male, looking off into the distance, apparently unaware his photo was being taken.

Once you noticed his clothes was when you were kinda like, "Wait." He was wearing a white t-shirt and those 1940s/50s type baggy slack/pants, and what appeared to be a 1950s style of work boots. He had an undercut/pompadour hairstyle. He appeared to be 40ish. He was clear as could be in the photo.

Then the woman, whose name I'm pretty sure was Janelle, told me what happened the day she took it. The photo was taken in the summer of 1981. She and her husband were amateur gardeners/flower growers, and they would document each season's plantings, bloomings, and all that by taking photos of them.

She said, "I went out into my yard one afternoon with my camera to get some photos of our plants. I got to the back of the yard, looked back at the house, and saw the man standing there. It scared the shit out of me, and I quickly began walking back up the yard to go out the gate. I thought someone had broken into my house. As I went back up the yard, I realized I had my camera in my hand , so I stopped and took a photo of the guy."

She said she never once felt like the guy saw her or was even aware she was there. She got out of her yard and went to a neighbors. They called the police and she called her husband. The police searched the house, as did her husband, who rushed home from work. They found nothing.

The police made note that she'd photographed the guy and asked her to bring the photo to an investigator when she got the film developed. She did, and when they saw it, the said, "Well, was indeed someone at your house." They made some notes, a description of the guy, and gave her the picture back after making a color copy of it.

She said that unlike most other stories you hear with such things, nothing had ever happened leading up to this day. No mysterious events or anything like that. The house was completely locked except the back door she'd come out of, so they were all baffled by it.

It was not till a week or two later that her husband and kids pointed out she might've seen a ghost and had a photo of an actual ghost.

I believe her story, and if she was pulling my chain, that was a hell of a set up. What made me believe was how crystal clear the man in the photo was. Perfect as you please, none of the typical traits you see in ghost photos. It was in focus. Everything was visible. It was clearly taken with 80s film in an 80s-era camera. It was just that the man in it appeared to be from maybe the late 40s, 50s, or even the early 60s.

I have no access to this photo, nor do I know the woman anymore. I left that job just before the holidays in 1991, and I have not seen her since.

https://www.castleofspirits.com/ghost-stories/ghost-photo
 
@DrPaulLee
My friend Jason Gotts filmed this at Thetford, Norfolk last night. I want to say it's genuine because he doesn't know how to fake footage and he isn't inclined to do so if he did. I'd been invited along last night but unfortunately I couldn't go.

If this is real, it's a full clear ghost walking past a window opening and reminds me of some of the Gettysburg ghosts videos, especially the way it moves. I think they went to Thetford Priory last night?. I'll ask him.

We'll notice that the anomaly first appears as a flash of light that has to be slowed down to study. I've been on quiet a few invests with Gottsy and the first thing he does when we wrap an evening up is to review his footage sitting in his van before we leave a location. Him talking in this footage isn't for the benefit of viewers, he'll have had someone (probably Steve) sat next to him and be talking to that person. He also has a tablet attached to the inside of his windscreen so we can watch back that way.

You're going to have to come out with us sometime in the new year mate!.

edit: I'll message him to ask him the make and model of his phone so I can post that info here and also ask him to keep the original video on his phone to deal with any allegations of tampering. I expect the object with the red glowing night was one of his rem pods which in theory we would have hoped would have also gone off emitting a shrill alarm but it doesn't seem to have. Possibly he didn't have the sound on on his phone when he was watching back in his van?.

 
Last edited:
These pictures were taken last night at a disused R.A.F. hospital in Lincolnshire by my friend and not at an old asylum as he's written. He wrote this early this morning and we've visited a few asylums recently so he's obviously got muddled up. I'm fond of the forth and seventh images.

View attachment 84138

View attachment 84139

View attachment 84140

View attachment 84141

View attachment 84142

View attachment 84143View attachment 84144
A couple of them looked like faces, the others not so much.
 
A couple of them looked like faces, the others not so much.
I agree with you Vardoger and looks a bit like, to me, isn't good enough proof of the paranormal but more wishful thinking.

I can't stress the following enough:

It's no good investigators turning up at a cold, wet and dirty location without a hot drink and something to eat. Our own bodies are one of the tools we're using as well as the other equipment. Our minds are going to play tricks on us when you add to it all that it's often also late at night so we'll be tired and we're sometimes somewhere we're hoping not to be spotted at so we could also be a bit nervous for that reason as well. Not the ideal conditions to be investigating in without a clear mind so it's sausage rolls and coffee for me. Some investigators tease me for it but then I'm not the one jumping at shadows half the night.
 
Last edited:
@DrPaulLee
My friend Jason Gotts filmed this at Thetford, Norfolk last night. I want to say it's genuine because he doesn't know how to fake footage and he isn't inclined to do so if he did. I'd been invited along last night but unfortunately I couldn't go.

If this is real, it's a full clear ghost walking past a window opening and reminds me of some of the Gettysburg ghosts videos, especially the way it moves. I think they went to Thetford Priory last night?. I'll ask him.

We'll notice that the anomaly first appears as a flash of light that has to be slowed down to study. I've been on quiet a few invests with Gottsy and the first thing he does when we wrap an evening up is to review his footage sitting in his van before we leave a location. Him talking in this footage isn't for the benefit of viewers, he'll have had someone (probably Steve) sat next to him and be talking to that person. He also has a tablet attached to the inside of his windscreen so we can watch back that way.

You're going to have to come out with us sometime in the new year mate!.

edit: I'll message him to ask him the make and model of his phone so I can post that info here and also ask him to keep the original video on his phone to deal with any allegations of tampering. I expect the object with the red glowing night was one of his rem pods which in theory we would have hoped would have also gone off emitting a shrill alarm but it doesn't seem to have. Possibly he didn't have the sound on on his phone when he was watching back in his van?.

That is an interesting one. I am not familiar with rem pods. Do they go off in response to movement?

It certainly looks like a person walking across the doorway. Do they know there were no other people in the place?
 
That is an interesting one. I am not familiar with rem pods. Do they go off in response to movement?

It certainly looks like a person walking across the doorway. Do they know there were no other people in the place?
Rem pods are motion activated, yes. I haven't talked with him yet to find out if any other people were in the place.

I'm curious about what the three static red squares are at the top on the window frame, the least obviously interesting part of the video. Also the frame glitch at the start of the video as well as the three metal looking bars behind the anomaly that are sometimes visible and sometimes not visible during the sequence.
 
Last edited:
Why is the camera moving? Again it’s just a blurry representation without clear detail. Please don’t say you’re going into these investigations without image stabilisation, a gimbal, tripod or at least a monopd?
 
Why is the camera moving? Again it’s just a blurry representation without clear detail. Please don’t say you’re going into these investigations without image stabilisation, a gimbal, tripod or at least a monopd?
Stabilisation isn't a more desired approach to broadcasting clips. Stabilised footage is mostly used by people trying to sell their video as a product. The mobile phone was (I'm told) mounted on a tripod, it's zoomed in so much though that if you accidently tap one/a train goes past etc etc they will wobble a bit.

You don't "go into these investigations without image stabilisation". Image stabilisation is something investigators can do afterwards if they chose a 'post production' editing route. Anyone who uses image stabilisation while filming live is risking artefacts altering the live recording so not giving a true representation of what might be happening on a play back viewing.

The man who filmed it owns a tripod and at the start of the above footage, I reckon he was using it but, again, I wasn't there. The footage looks heavily zoomed in which might account for the wobble we're seeing. A common mistake is camera operators holding or even touching the cheaper flimsy tripods which often creates that wobble.
 
Last edited:
I would have thought image stabilisation in post produces more artefacts than in-camera adjustment that calculates focal length, field of view etc.
Also, the portrait tik tok aspect ratio risks you potentially missing what could be going on at the sides.
 
I would have thought image stabilisation in post produces more artefacts than in-camera adjustment that calculates focal length, field of view etc.
Also, the portrait tik tok aspect ratio risks you potentially missing what could be going on at the sides.
I suppose that would depend on what he's filming with. I'm only used to filming on a camcorder that has no image stabilisation so what we film is what you get. I've never made an investigation video using a mobile phone. That has to be way forward when people who are watching later want to study clips deeper IMO. Bang on agree with the tik tok limits. Even worse, his videos are currently limited to very short clips instead of a larger and longer playtime platform like Youtube. He says he's recently bought a camcorder and I've got a friend who's an ace editor to make sense of anything we capture that lasts longer than 30 or so seconds so she's willing to cut together any films we have.

Our live streams are the real deal so they're boring as fuck compared to stuff like Most Haunted or Ghost Adventures .. we just stream then stop when we get bored.

However we shoot these videos, there's always going to be someone who calls us frauds so we don't make our videos for those people but for ourselves instead, mainly so we can watch them back for ourselves.
 
I’m not calling you frauds, just suggesting you invest in better equipment and approach to recording. A low light beast camera with a similar lens should be top of the list.
 
I’m not calling you frauds, just suggesting you invest in better equipment and approach to recording. A low light beast camera with a similar lens should be top of the list.
Yeah, I know you weren't calling us frauds lol. Some people will because, to be fair, there are a lot of frauds out there so that doesn't upset us an we don't take it personally so long as they're not rude about it. It's more how we store our data so can show the original if anyone wants to see it so we could/can prove it hasn't been tampered with later on. I've got an EDP journalist friend looking into the above footage atm in case my friend wants them to also publish it. But then people could reasonably argue that we'd performed some in camera trickery instead. Paranormal investigators can't win when it comes to providing 100% irrefutable proof of an after life. Even if we did, someone would accuse of hypnotism or something.

There's an old saying that I won't get exactly right but it goes something like "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is sufficient." .. so mistakes are made on both sides.

I've asked him to message me with the make and model of his phone. I haven't seen his new camcorder yet. He's also bought a light cube for use with his camera so his footage should become clearer. We've used the light cube once already with good results.

My friend Eddie Mallet uses an infra read camera instead of night vision which I'm lusting after because as you'll know those pick up a different light frequency.

edit: one thing some teams get wrong is how they use a laser thermometer at location. That is, some will just blindly point one into the darkness. A laser thermometer needs to be pointed at a solid surface to take any kind of accurate reading.
 
Last edited:
I would have thought image stabilisation in post produces more artefacts than in-camera adjustment that calculates focal length, field of view etc.
IMO, using any image improving software while you're filming live means you're already altering the image and so not truly filming exactly what's happening live in front of you. Some apps are sort of like someone wearing make up to make themselves look better. You're not actually seeing the real person as they were then but an 'improved' version of how they were then.
 
Last edited:
Has this one featured yet? Some pareidolia and some blatant fakery, especially the alleged poltergeist cleansing:


Better stuff to be found here:

Suspected visitors from the 'other side' proved particularly adept at making their presence known this past year. Throughout 2024, eerie anomalies believed by some to be spirits were spotted by way of home security systems, trail cameras, baby monitors, and even the GPS of a Tesla driving through a graveyard. This past year saw a security guard filmed talking to a lost child who wasn't there, mystifying footprints thought to have been left behind by a friendly neighbor who had recently passed away, and even a particularly chilling tale of possible otherworldly contact courtesy of pro wrestling legend Hulk Hogan. Check out C2C's spookiest ghost videos of 2024, if you dare ...

https://www.coasttocoastam.com/article/c2cs-spookiest-ghost-videos-of-2024/
 
Has this one featured yet? Some pareidolia and some blatant fakery, especially the alleged poltergeist cleansing:


Better stuff to be found here:

Suspected visitors from the 'other side' proved particularly adept at making their presence known this past year. Throughout 2024, eerie anomalies believed by some to be spirits were spotted by way of home security systems, trail cameras, baby monitors, and even the GPS of a Tesla driving through a graveyard. This past year saw a security guard filmed talking to a lost child who wasn't there, mystifying footprints thought to have been left behind by a friendly neighbor who had recently passed away, and even a particularly chilling tale of possible otherworldly contact courtesy of pro wrestling legend Hulk Hogan. Check out C2C's spookiest ghost videos of 2024, if you dare ...

https://www.coasttocoastam.com/article/c2cs-spookiest-ghost-videos-of-2024/
Skipping to 8:22 in that video, we're presented with a closeup of an image described as a black monk or the ghost of a previous resident of the lighthouse. I'm going to call it a faked image because if you look at the bottom of the suggested cape of the black figure, it slightly overlaps the wall that's instead way in the foreground.
 
Last edited:
I'd like to see the video not rewound and forwarded a bunch though.
Fair enough if that's your personal preference. Personally, I find it useful to see JFK's brains flying back into his head then backwards and forwards a few times so I can work out what angle he was shot in the head from. Even back then regarding that tragic event and with multiple live witnesses, there were people trying there absolute hardest to suggest the footage of that event had instead been tampered with as an example. Sometimes presidents are shot and sometimes real ghosts are filmed.
 
Back
Top