- Joined
- Jul 30, 2001
- Messages
- 117
From time to time I have heard claims that a seated person can be "levitated" simply by using the index finger of four others standing alongside. Having never seen this attempted, I decided to try and set up an experiment. Thelma Moss in The Probability of the Impossible (J.P. Tarcher Inc., NY, 1974) described a method (of unstated source) by means of which four standing people acting in unison lift a seated fifth from two to four feet in the air after systematically placing their hands in a stack on the seated person’s head. Moss wrote that she had included the demonstration in several parapsychology classes she had taught, and had met with failure only once. I decided to do some research using her method.
A few points from the Moss text:
1. The seated person should be the heaviest of the group, and is required not to co-operate, resist, or become active in any way.
2. Pratice is said to be important in establishing rhythmical movement by chanting five or six times before making the lift; Moss suggests use of the phrase "chocolate cake" and "hot fudge sundae".
3. The extended forefinger of both hands are to be used, palm down, under armpits and knees.
4. The lifters are said to experience no effort
5. The lifted person is said to experience a feeling of lightness and exhilaration.
6. In some cases, after some success, it is not necessary to place hands on the seated person’s head.
7. No explanation is offered as to how the "levitation" occurs.
It seemed sensible to get an idea of the weight which can be lifted in the manner described in more mundane circumstances. Moss does not define the lifting position on the fingers. I chose to use all of the finger from the tip to, but not including, the knuckle. By suspending weights from an inch- (25mm) wide leather belt, I soon confirmed that, as expected, the load was carried by the longest joints. Greater lifting ability is obviously possible by taking the load actually on the knuckles, but this effectively amounts to using the hands rather than the extended forefingers. I found I could manage about 181b (8kg), which led to the conclusion that four people lifting together might be expected to cope with up to about 771b (35kg). I tried to replicate Moss’s results with the interested help of two different groups of people (three female, two male each time) on two separate occasions at my home in December 1997. The seated person weighed about 2101b (95kg). On each occasion there were a few arguments and many laughs and, after practice at achieving a rhythm, seven lifting attempts were made. We did not achieve lift-off. Perhaps there are other readers who would like to have a go and report their experiences.
John Rudkin, Cambridgeshire
A few points from the Moss text:
1. The seated person should be the heaviest of the group, and is required not to co-operate, resist, or become active in any way.
2. Pratice is said to be important in establishing rhythmical movement by chanting five or six times before making the lift; Moss suggests use of the phrase "chocolate cake" and "hot fudge sundae".
3. The extended forefinger of both hands are to be used, palm down, under armpits and knees.
4. The lifters are said to experience no effort
5. The lifted person is said to experience a feeling of lightness and exhilaration.
6. In some cases, after some success, it is not necessary to place hands on the seated person’s head.
7. No explanation is offered as to how the "levitation" occurs.
It seemed sensible to get an idea of the weight which can be lifted in the manner described in more mundane circumstances. Moss does not define the lifting position on the fingers. I chose to use all of the finger from the tip to, but not including, the knuckle. By suspending weights from an inch- (25mm) wide leather belt, I soon confirmed that, as expected, the load was carried by the longest joints. Greater lifting ability is obviously possible by taking the load actually on the knuckles, but this effectively amounts to using the hands rather than the extended forefingers. I found I could manage about 181b (8kg), which led to the conclusion that four people lifting together might be expected to cope with up to about 771b (35kg). I tried to replicate Moss’s results with the interested help of two different groups of people (three female, two male each time) on two separate occasions at my home in December 1997. The seated person weighed about 2101b (95kg). On each occasion there were a few arguments and many laughs and, after practice at achieving a rhythm, seven lifting attempts were made. We did not achieve lift-off. Perhaps there are other readers who would like to have a go and report their experiences.
John Rudkin, Cambridgeshire