I've always enjoyed Mat Coward's "Mythconceptions" and over the years it's caused all sorts of debates in the various places I've worked. In one case, my boss wasn't amused when I told her that according to Mythconceptions all the time she'd been playing her child, at the time a toddler, classical music (from pregnancy onwards) it was unlikely to improve his intelligence. Her stiff reaction was probably borne of embarrassment, resulted in absolute denial, and reminded me of the "cognitive dissonance" theories about the millennialists, examining why people redouble their efforts despite being proved wrong (not that playing classical music is going to do anyone any harm, of course. Frankly I'd have much preferred a bit of Havergal Brian while growing up than the Frank Ifield and Cliff Richard I was subjected to).
Anyhow, I did run into a bit of a problem on Facebook recently when a FOAF (an actual named friend of one of my Facebook friends, rather than an untraceable piece of gossip down the pub, I should add!) made a comment on my friends profile about having to change her name by Deed Poll. I definitely recalled a Mythconceptions about this, saying that Deed Polls were unneccessary for people wishing to change their name in the UK and you could change your name just by giving yourself a new one and having it witnessed by a responsible person. I checked with CAB online, and it does indeed say this, so I just told my friend they technically didn't need to pay for one.
Unfortunately my FOAF who lives in Scotland and was relocating as a single parent with children, couldn't find anyone in authority to actually accept her change of name without a Deed Poll certificate, her solicitor wouldn't even be the 'responsible person' without sight of one (kind of defeating the point of the 'responsible person' legislation).
I eventually dug out the Mythconceptions concerned, FT 224 in July 2007, and Mat's source was CAB, same as mine. It appears then that while this might well be the law, the actual application of it in reality is much harder. It's probably much easier just to get a Deed Poll certificate than to get another solicitor to take action against your first solicitor for ignoring the law!
Incidentally, Mythconceptions always suggests that if you know of anything contrary to its source, you should contact FT via the letters page. However in FT 224 it reads: "If we've got this wrong and you can put us right, kindly address your letters and emails to Sir Ebenezer Knobdonkey, Editor, at Fortean Times." Has he moved on?
Anyhow, I did run into a bit of a problem on Facebook recently when a FOAF (an actual named friend of one of my Facebook friends, rather than an untraceable piece of gossip down the pub, I should add!) made a comment on my friends profile about having to change her name by Deed Poll. I definitely recalled a Mythconceptions about this, saying that Deed Polls were unneccessary for people wishing to change their name in the UK and you could change your name just by giving yourself a new one and having it witnessed by a responsible person. I checked with CAB online, and it does indeed say this, so I just told my friend they technically didn't need to pay for one.
Unfortunately my FOAF who lives in Scotland and was relocating as a single parent with children, couldn't find anyone in authority to actually accept her change of name without a Deed Poll certificate, her solicitor wouldn't even be the 'responsible person' without sight of one (kind of defeating the point of the 'responsible person' legislation).
I eventually dug out the Mythconceptions concerned, FT 224 in July 2007, and Mat's source was CAB, same as mine. It appears then that while this might well be the law, the actual application of it in reality is much harder. It's probably much easier just to get a Deed Poll certificate than to get another solicitor to take action against your first solicitor for ignoring the law!
Incidentally, Mythconceptions always suggests that if you know of anything contrary to its source, you should contact FT via the letters page. However in FT 224 it reads: "If we've got this wrong and you can put us right, kindly address your letters and emails to Sir Ebenezer Knobdonkey, Editor, at Fortean Times." Has he moved on?