• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Nero: Was He The Monster We Thought He Was?

Bilderberger

Gone But Not Forgotten
(ACCOUNT RETIRED)
Joined
Aug 9, 2001
Messages
591
NOTE: The pre-2020 posts quoted here represent excerpts illustrating the mainstream view of Nero as something of a super-villain.

... Thanks to Google, I have found the following passage direct from Tacitus' Annals.............

"But not all the relief that could come from man, not all the bounties that the prince could bestow, nor all the atonements which could be presented to the gods, availed to relieve Nero from the infamy of being believed to have ordered the conflagration, the fire of Rome. Hence to suppress the rumor, he falsely charged with the guilt, and punished Christians, who were hated for their enormities. ..."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There was a documentary on the Emperor Nero a few years ago that IIRC said that as a young man Nero was rumoured to get his jollies by going out with friends and basically stabbing some poor prole to death and leaving the body in the gutter, it also said that this kind of thing wasn't at all uncommon for that period. ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
... The Church traditions of persecution in Rome have always been overblown, Nero may have briefly targeted Christians alone but he also killed a lot of members of different groups ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
... Nero did not fiddle while Rome burned. Not only had the fiddle not been invented, but Tacitus reports that Nero was elsewhere at the time of the fire, returned to Rome, personally helped with the relief effort, and paid for much of it from his own funds. ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This lengthy article from Smithsonian Magazine describes the reasons for Nero's villainous reputation and the counterarguments suggesting Nero - though not an angel - has been remembered solely via the slurs others heaped upon his name.
THE NEW, NICER NERO

Among history’s most durable memes, one ranks particularly high: a fleshy fellow in a toga, laurel wreath encircling his temples, standing among the columns of an ancient portico, while all around him, fire consumes the great city of Rome. He is not alarmed. Quite the contrary. He calmly plucks the strings of a lyre and, yes, even appears to be singing!

The meme says everything we need to know about this egotistical monster, his wanton indifference to human suffering and his pathetic delusions of artistic grandeur. He is at once childish and murderous. The story has been told and retold for almost 2,000 years, but it is Hollywood, not surprisingly, that has supplied the pictures in our heads. Pride of place must surely go to Mervyn LeRoy’s 1951 epic Quo Vadis, thanks to Peter Ustinov’s deliciously hammy Nero (the actor was nominated for an Oscar). “Look what I have painted!” shrieks Ustinov as he watches the Technicolor flames engulf his city. ...

The man most responsible for Nero’s modern incarnation is the Polish novelist Henryk Sienkiewicz, whose Quo Vadis: A Narrative of the Time of Nero, appeared in 1895 and was the basis for the Mervyn LeRoy film and half a dozen other cinematic versions. ...

Sienkiewicz plucks two strings that resonated loudly with his audience, and have done so ever since: Nero’s role as the emblematic persecutor of early Christianity (Poland is a deeply Catholic country) and Nero’s political tyranny (to Sienkiewicz, an ardent nationalist, Nero’s Rome stood in for czarist Russia). ...

But what if Nero wasn’t such a monster? What if he didn’t invent the spectator sport of throwing Christians to the lions in the Colosseum? What if he wasn’t the tyrant who murdered upstanding Roman senators and debauched their wives? Indeed, what if the whole lurid rap sheet has been an elaborate set-up, with Nero as history’s patsy? After all, we have no eyewitness testimony from Nero’s reign. Any contemporaneous writings have been lost. The ancient Roman sources we do have date from considerably after Nero’s suicide in A.D. 68. The case against Nero, then, is largely hearsay, amplified and distorted over two millennia in history’s longest game of telephone. Besides, no one really wants to straighten out the record. Who wants another version of Nero? He’s the perfect evil tyrant just the way he is.

A few lonely voices have come to Nero’s defense. In 1562, the Milanese polymath Girolamo Cardano published a treatise, Neronis Encomium. He argued that Nero had been slandered by his principal accusers. ...

Out of all the modern scholars coming to the emperor’s rescue, the most comprehensive is John Drinkwater, an emeritus professor of Roman history at the University of Nottingham. Drinkwater has spent 12 years poring over the charges against Nero, and dismantling them one by one. Scourge of Christianity? Nope. Urban pyromaniac? No again. And on down through matricide, wife-killing and a string of other high crimes and misdemeanors.

The Nero who appears in Drinkwater’s revisionist new account, Nero: Emperor and Court, published last year, is no angel. But one comes away with some sympathy for this needy lightweight who probably never wanted to be emperor in the first place and should never have been allowed to wear the purple toga. ...

FULL STORY: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/new-nicer-nero-history-roman-emperor-180975776/
 
Last edited:
Was reading Tom Holland's enjoyable & compelling nonfiction book Dynasty, which features Nero, and Holland also has a rather revisionist attitude regarding the emperor. TH seems to believe that Nero is and was much misunderstood and that the emperor, to the greatest extent, took as his cue the Romans' habit of overly-glorifying their rulers*. In other words, Nero the 'artist' supposedly made fantasy his reality, and his imagination was beyond human scale. There's something in this, surely, but the (understandably) detached perspective of an historian habitually overlooks those awkward things: the damage done, the human cost, the immorality of it all.

As an aside, Nero's reported 'utterly-uttter' utterances often remind me of another artist of the imagination: Oscar Wilde. Curiously, Oscar once sported a 'Nero hairstyle', on returning from a stint in France.


*In this sense, if people are declared to be gods then it's no wonder if those people accordingly act is if human affairs are unworthy of notice. This expedient god-making habit of the Senate led to its inevitable conclusion in Nero; arguably, it's similar to how Donald Trump becoming President might be viewed as the natural culmination of American big business's influence on politics and media.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top