• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Nuclear Damage

assuming you asked me, 'course I did, was anybody succesful in avoiding exposure to them? but, I rather prefer DUCKMAN
 
Last edited:
I answered that same question (as well as I could, using arbitrary means) a few posts back, miss Zebra.. in reality, I don't think nuclear fall-out is a problem at all, it will only end life on the planet in a relatively short time-frame and will only cause temporary suffering of souls, while the rest can't procreate..

Apologies, I must have missed your earlier post.



In case any of you have forgotten, there was an explosion in the Urals back in the fifties. A very good book was written by the scientist who pieced together the details.

Here is a link.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyshtym_disaster

Thanks for the link... reading it now.
 
no problem, arbeZ s'regnidorhcS, this thread has always been a bit chaotic, just like the [secret] main topic, sometimes there's news breaking, sometimes there's cover-ups hushing it..

https://forums.forteana.org/index.php?threads/nuclear-damage.65370/page-3#post-1808831

(Fukushima was not just another meltdown of design-flawed reactors, causing the explosion of accumulated hydrogen-gas, blowing the buildings to pieces, but a consequent detonation of a large stored amount of weapons-grade material in the case of unit-3. in this thread alone there are several indications of this.)

here's an article stating that this explosion/detonation may also have been a 'deflagration':

https://pissinontheroses.blogspot.com/2011/05/was-fukushima-daiichi-3-explosion.html

water.PNG


soil.PNG
 
Last edited:
anyway, it's a shame we're being left in the dark for 8+ years now on this specific issue: on the web, most of what you can find says 'explosion', instead of 'three-fold detonation'.. this is one of the reasons why I started this thread.
 
In case any of you have forgotten, there was an explosion in the Urals back in the fifties. A very good book was written by the scientist who pieced together the details.

Here is a link.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyshtym_disaster

I'd never heard of this. The 3rd worst behind Chernoblyl & Fukushima. The details of waste being discharged directly into lakes & rivers even before the explosion is alarming on it's own. Thanks for the link.
 
I perhaps should have worded my post better. I meant "no longer a problem" in response to INT21's post about '33 years on we're all still here"; I'd been trying to make a comparison between Fukushima and Chernobyl; in terms of radiation leakage Chernobyl was far worse than Fukushima (as you can see from my earlier post) but, as INT21 pointed out "we're all still here" - so, the idea that Fukushima is going to kill us all within 5 years kinda doesn't make much sense (to me anyway).

But we all have our own opinions and that's fine. :)

How big a problem do you think Chernobyl still is? (And compared to Fukushima)?

some of us are still here...
 
(gee, what a coincidence!) I just did that 3 hours ago in yet another thread on 'total biosphere collapse':

https://forums.forteana.org/index.p...ng-in-the-end-times.65628/page-3#post-1879874

also, in last weeks' world-wide weather report (as interpreted and presented by Dane Wigington), there are some alarming remarks with regard to Fukushima. I know it's a drag going through yet another hour of his statements, but they are factual and indicative of the current global crisis:

https://forums.forteana.org/index.p...chemtrails-spraying.43306/page-6#post-1879921
 
Last edited:
Still seeing the fallout affect honey even 60 - 70 years afterwards.

Fallout from nuclear bomb tests in the 1950s and ’60s is showing up in U.S. honey, according to a new study.

Although the levels of radioactivity aren’t dangerous, they may have been much higher in the 1970s and ’80s, researchers say.

“It’s really quite incredible,” says Daniel Richter, a soil scientist at Duke University not involved with the work. The study, he says, shows that the fallout “is still out there and disguising itself as a major nutrient.”

In the wake of World War II, the United States, the former Soviet Union, and other countries detonated hundreds of nuclear warheads in aboveground tests. The bombs ejected radiocesium—a radioactive form of the element cesium—into the upper atmosphere, and winds dispersed it around the world before it fell out of the skies in microscopic particles. The spread wasn’t uniform, however. For example, far more fallout dusted the U.S. east coast, thanks to regional wind and rainfall patterns. ...

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/04/nuclear-fallout-showing-us-honey-decades-after-bomb-tests
 
We shouldnt be eating honey anyhow.
Yes, it should be left for the bees.
The honey harvested from modern hives is only the excess honey produced, the majority of the honey is left for the bees, modern hives are divided into 2 sections, the bottom, larger section is where the bees coloney lives, breeds and raises young, once this section is full of honey, the bee then fill the smaller upper section of the hive with excess honey which is not needed for the coloney, except for in extrordinary situations, such as the main store of honey being destroyed. The smaller section of the hive is whete the honey we use is harvested from. Only if you take all of the honey from the hive will the bees starve.
 
Its sugar.

Lots bad for you and not much good.

If you really must do something with the honey, brew mead.
 
Only on this forum can one click on a thread entitled "Nuclear Damage" and find, in full swing, a debate on the nutritional qualities of honey.
 
A study had found that there is no additional DNA damage passed on to children born to parents who were affected by radiation from the Chernobyl explosion.

"Participants, all conceived after the disaster and born between 1987 and 2002, had their whole genomes screened.

The study found no mutations that were associated with a parent's exposure."

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-56846728
 
The continued fallout from the nuclear tests carried out by France in the desert of its former colony, Algeria, continues to pollute relations between the two countries more than 60 years later, as Maher Mezahi reports from Algiers.
Short presentational grey line

On the morning of 13 February 1960, just 45 minutes after the French army detonated an atomic bomb as a test in the Algerian Sahara, President Charles de Gaulle sent a message to his army minister.

"Hoorah for France," read the note. "This morning she is stronger and prouder. From the bottom of my heart, I thank you and those who have achieved this magnificent success."

The detonation of the plutonium-filled bomb - known as Blue Jerboa - and the subsequent 16 explosions of nuclear weapons in Algeria were seen as a display of French strength and development.nAt the time, Algeria was a French colony.

Yet the atmosphere on the ground, where 6,500 French engineers, soldiers and researchers worked on the project alongside 3,500 Algerian manual labourers, was less celebratory. The bomb had been placed on top of a 100m-tall tower before the explosion.Witnesses recount feeling the ground shake and, when permitted to face the blast, seeing a gigantic mushroom cloud. ...

"In 1960 when the bomb detonated, there were more than 6,000 inhabitants. Reggane was not in the middle of nowhere," the 57 year-old told the BBC. "From what we are told by researchers, long-term effects started around 20 years after the first bomb was detonated and they will continue to last for decades. Many of those who were contaminated have already passed away due to unknown medical causes. They were told they had rare illnesses but they didn't really know the specific nature of their illness," Mr Toumi explained.

Immediately after the Blue Jerboa blast, there were protests across the region as nuclear fallout from the bomb would be detected as far as Senegal, Ivory Coast, Burkina Faso and Sudan. ...

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-56799670
 
The continued fallout from the nuclear tests carried out by France in the desert of its former colony, Algeria, continues to pollute relations between the two countries more than 60 years later, as Maher Mezahi reports from Algiers.
Short presentational grey line

On the morning of 13 February 1960, just 45 minutes after the French army detonated an atomic bomb as a test in the Algerian Sahara, President Charles de Gaulle sent a message to his army minister.

"Hoorah for France," read the note. "This morning she is stronger and prouder. From the bottom of my heart, I thank you and those who have achieved this magnificent success."

The detonation of the plutonium-filled bomb - known as Blue Jerboa - and the subsequent 16 explosions of nuclear weapons in Algeria were seen as a display of French strength and development.nAt the time, Algeria was a French colony.

Yet the atmosphere on the ground, where 6,500 French engineers, soldiers and researchers worked on the project alongside 3,500 Algerian manual labourers, was less celebratory. The bomb had been placed on top of a 100m-tall tower before the explosion.Witnesses recount feeling the ground shake and, when permitted to face the blast, seeing a gigantic mushroom cloud. ...

"In 1960 when the bomb detonated, there were more than 6,000 inhabitants. Reggane was not in the middle of nowhere," the 57 year-old told the BBC. "From what we are told by researchers, long-term effects started around 20 years after the first bomb was detonated and they will continue to last for decades. Many of those who were contaminated have already passed away due to unknown medical causes. They were told they had rare illnesses but they didn't really know the specific nature of their illness," Mr Toumi explained.

Immediately after the Blue Jerboa blast, there were protests across the region as nuclear fallout from the bomb would be detected as far as Senegal, Ivory Coast, Burkina Faso and Sudan. ...

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-56799670
I never realised that France tested its weapons in Algeria. I know that the UK tested its weapons in Australia and I always assumed that France tested all of its weapons in the Pacific, causing no harm unless you happened to live there...

... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-56340159
 
Back
Top