Nuclear Damage

[INT21]

adding that I'm of strong suspicion that whatever was on Mars indeed wasn't destroyed by the Soviets or China, but probably by some other party. who would be a more difficult party to find evidence of, NASA/JPL or some 'ancient martian/extraterrestrial party'?..

..I do like dr. Brandenburgs insinuations, because they point exactly the right way, except for one fundamental lie: that Mars was nuked to catastrophe some time very long ago, while it was probably (very likely) done after the second world war and before perestrojka..

View attachment 18444

View attachment 18448

After WWII, and yet no one noticed ?

INT21.

 

[Nils Meijer]

people on this world only developed nuclear arms that leave the exact same 'signature in Xenon' in the last century and aliens wouldn't use such dirty technology, leaving a planet dead for millions of years of half-time.. of course, people noticed, like dr. Brandenburg and the 'stretching of time' he does is about a factor 10.000.000 (he stated that these blasts on Mars occurred 250 mln - 500 mln years ago). divide that by 10 mln and you get something like the period I mentioned: 25-50 years ago..

 

[Nils Meijer]

I quite agree; I'm not scaremongering about nuclear power (I'd much rather have nuclear power stations than god-awful windfarms ruining the landscape). I was just playing devils advocate and asking the question of whether, seeing as Chernobyl had been mentioned, there was a possibility that Fukushima was actually worse (in which case the point that Chernobyl is no longer a problem, wouldn't be relevant).

That's all

I wouldn't agree Chernobyl is no longer a problem, but that's just opinion.

 

[INT21]

But Nils, people have been studying Mars for two hundred years or more.

No one reported anything but red rock. Even the 'canals' of Schiaparelli were a misinterpretation of the Italian 'canalli', meaning channels. Not canals as in water conduits.

 

[Nils Meijer]

But Nils, people have been studying Mars for two hundred years or more.

No one reported anything but red rock. Even the 'canals' of Schiaparelli were a misinterpretation of the Italian 'canalli', meaning channels. Not canals as in water conduits.

ah-ha, I guess THAT exactly was the moment when some completely paranoid administration freaked out and decided to exterminate whatever what was happening on Mars, but hell (=Hades/Voivod), I'm only 1 in some many people to believe such a thing (it seems).

[google-RECAPTHA! spot all the pictures with canals..]

 

[Tempest63]

I'd risk it, even though Miss Cornwall does seem to be unused to electric lights. And shoes.

maximus otter

Pretty girl but she looks like she should’ve spent a penny before going on stage.

 

[Schrodinger's Zebra]

I wouldn't agree Chernobyl is no longer a problem, but that's just opinion.

I perhaps should have worded my post better. I meant "no longer a problem" in response to INT21's post about '33 years on we're all still here"; I'd been trying to make a comparison between Fukushima and Chernobyl; in terms of radiation leakage Chernobyl was far worse than Fukushima (as you can see from my earlier post) but, as INT21 pointed out "we're all still here" - so, the idea that Fukushima is going to kill us all within 5 years kinda doesn't make much sense (to me anyway).

But we all have our own opinions and that's fine.

How big a problem do you think Chernobyl still is? (And compared to Fukushima)?

 

[INT21]

In case any of you have forgotten, there was an explosion in the Urals back in the fifties. A very good book was written by the scientist who pieced together the details.

Here is a link.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyshtym_disaster

 

[Nils Meijer]

I answered that same question (as well as I could, using arbitrary means) a few posts back, miss Zebra.. in reality, I don't think nuclear fall-out is a problem at all, it will only end life on the planet in a relatively short time-frame and will only cause temporary suffering of souls, while the rest can't procreate..

 

[Tempest63]

Nuclear plants are quite safe because the operators are highly trained and in complete control, what could possibly go wrong?

PAH! Good god man have you never watched the Simpsons?

 

[Nils Meijer]

assuming you asked me, 'course I did, was anybody succesful in avoiding exposure to them? but, I rather prefer DUCKMAN

 

[Schrodinger's Zebra]

I answered that same question (as well as I could, using arbitrary means) a few posts back, miss Zebra.. in reality, I don't think nuclear fall-out is a problem at all, it will only end life on the planet in a relatively short time-frame and will only cause temporary suffering of souls, while the rest can't procreate..

Apologies, I must have missed your earlier post.

In case any of you have forgotten, there was an explosion in the Urals back in the fifties. A very good book was written by the scientist who pieced together the details.

Here is a link.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyshtym_disaster

Thanks for the link... reading it now.

 

[Nils Meijer]

no problem, arbeZ s'regnidorhcS, this thread has always been a bit chaotic, just like the [secret] main topic, sometimes there's news breaking, sometimes there's cover-ups hushing it..

https://forums.forteana.org/index.php?threads/nuclear-damage.65370/page-3#post-1808831

(Fukushima was not just another meltdown of design-flawed reactors, causing the explosion of accumulated hydrogen-gas, blowing the buildings to pieces, but a consequent detonation of a large stored amount of weapons-grade material in the case of unit-3. in this thread alone there are several indications of this.)

here's an article stating that this explosion/detonation may also have been a 'deflagration':

https://pissinontheroses.blogspot.com/2011/05/was-fukushima-daiichi-3-explosion.html

 

[Nils Meijer]

anyway, it's a shame we're being left in the dark for 8+ years now on this specific issue: on the web, most of what you can find says 'explosion', instead of 'three-fold detonation'.. this is one of the reasons why I started this thread.

 

[hunck]

In case any of you have forgotten, there was an explosion in the Urals back in the fifties. A very good book was written by the scientist who pieced together the details.

Here is a link.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyshtym_disaster

I'd never heard of this. The 3rd worst behind Chernoblyl & Fukushima. The details of waste being discharged directly into lakes & rivers even before the explosion is alarming on it's own. Thanks for the link.

 

[Nils Meijer]

another fall-out map:

another video-compilation, accompanied by relaxing elevator-music, saying everything's wrong:

another 'nuclear hotseat'-podcast on Fukushima (feb 2019 anniversary)

http://nuclearhotseat.com/2019/02/2...o1pOGfSEIr92W_tI1JfcJwa7ihGKxYnyxrbQwBno_tspE

 

[Naughty_Felid]

I perhaps should have worded my post better. I meant "no longer a problem" in response to INT21's post about '33 years on we're all still here"; I'd been trying to make a comparison between Fukushima and Chernobyl; in terms of radiation leakage Chernobyl was far worse than Fukushima (as you can see from my earlier post) but, as INT21 pointed out "we're all still here" - so, the idea that Fukushima is going to kill us all within 5 years kinda doesn't make much sense (to me anyway).

But we all have our own opinions and that's fine.

How big a problem do you think Chernobyl still is? (And compared to Fukushima)?

some of us are still here...

 

[kamalktk]

Parts of the Marshall Island chain are a thousand times more radioactive than Fukushima, and have been so for 60 years or so. If people believes Fukushima is going to imminently kill us all, they have some explaining to do on why we aren't all long dead from the Marshall Islands.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/17/asia/marshall-island-radiation-chernobyl-intl-hnk/index.html

 

[Nils Meijer]

(gee, what a coincidence!) I just did that 3 hours ago in yet another thread on 'total biosphere collapse':

https://forums.forteana.org/index.p...ng-in-the-end-times.65628/page-3#post-1879874

also, in last weeks' world-wide weather report (as interpreted and presented by Dane Wigington), there are some alarming remarks with regard to Fukushima. I know it's a drag going through yet another hour of his statements, but they are factual and indicative of the current global crisis:

https://forums.forteana.org/index.p...chemtrails-spraying.43306/page-6#post-1879921