• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Osama Bin Laden Is Dead

The writing certainly doesn't!

Was it a liquid lunch at the Tele, or were there work experience boys in for the day?

One email stamped secret and sent on May 2 by a senior Navy officer briefly describes how bin Laden's body was washed, wrapped in a white sheet, and then placed in a weighted bag.
According to another message from the Vinson's public affairs officer, only a small group of the ship's leadership was informed of the burial

Bin Laden was killed on May 1, 2011, by a Navy SEAL team that assaulted his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. His body was carried out to sea by the USS Carl Vinson.

"Traditional procedures for Islamic burial was followed," the May 2 email from Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette reads. "A military officer read prepared religious remarks, which were translated into Arabic by a native speaker. After the words were complete, the body was placed on a prepared flat board, tipped up, whereupon the deceased's body slid into the sea."

- How do you stamp an email before you send it?
- 'Navy officer'? If you like... 'Naval officer' is preferred.
- What is 'the ship's leadership'? Bodies of men have leaders, not ships.
- 'Traditional procedures was followed.'??
- 'After the words were complete'? Were there letters missing?
 
theyithian said:
The writing certainly doesn't!

Was it a liquid lunch at the Tele, or were there work experience boys in for the day?
Source: AP

They probably didn't want to tamper with text from such a revered source! ;)
 
I posted this in another thread, and realized it fits here better.

Paul Craig Roberts recently wrote an article which includes a translation of an interview with a Pakistani man who claims to have witnessed the whole raid from his rooftop next door.
In short, he says that the "Osama compound" was his neighbor's house, and his neighbor was not Osama Bin Laden. He says a helicopter landed, dropped off a group of soldiers. He said they were speaking Pashtu(Afghani language), telling people to stay in their houses or they would be shot. He says 20 minutes later, the helicopter returned, picked them up, and as it was taking off, it exploded, killing all on board. He says everyone from the neighborhood went over to see, and were on the scene and saw body parts and no survivors.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2013/09 ... g-roberts/
 
Interesting interview with the Pulitzer prize winning journalist, Seymour Hersh, in the Guardian.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/media-blog/2013/sep/27/seymour-hersh-obama-nsa-american-media


Seymour Hersh on Obama, NSA and the 'pathetic' American media

Pulitzer Prize winner explains how to fix journalism, saying press should 'fire 90% of editors and promote ones you can't control'

The Guardian. Lisa O'Carroll. 27 September 2013

Seymour Hersh has got some extreme ideas on how to fix journalism – close down the news bureaus of NBC and ABC, sack 90% of editors in publishing and get back to the fundamental job of journalists which, he says, is to be an outsider.

It doesn't take much to fire up Hersh, the investigative journalist who has been the nemesis of US presidents since the 1960s and who was once described by the Republican party as "the closest thing American journalism has to a terrorist".

He is angry about the timidity of journalists in America, their failure to challenge the White House and be an unpopular messenger of truth.

Don't even get him started on the New York Times which, he says, spends "so much more time carrying water for Obama than I ever thought they would" – or the death of Osama bin Laden. "Nothing's been done about that story, it's one big lie, not one word of it is true," he says of the dramatic US Navy Seals raid in 2011.

Hersh is writing a book about national security and has devoted a chapter to the bin Laden killing. He says a recent report put out by an "independent" Pakistani commission about life in the Abottabad compound in which Bin Laden was holed up would not stand up to scrutiny. "The Pakistanis put out a report, don't get me going on it. Let's put it this way, it was done with considerable American input. It's a bullshit report," he says hinting of revelations to come in his book.


The Obama administration lies systematically, he claims, yet none of the leviathans of American media, the TV networks or big print titles, challenge him.

"It's pathetic, they are more than obsequious, they are afraid to pick on this guy [Obama]," he declares in an interview with the Guardian.

...
Rest of the interview at link.

Hersh won his Pulitzer for exposing the May Lai Massacre.
 
I think this fits here.

Trucker Protest Gets Crazier with Lady Who Believes Obama Is Osama
BY THE RED PHOENIX on OCTOBER 9, 2013 • ( 0 )
http://theredphoenixapl.org/2013/10/09/ ... -is-osama/

TruckerOsama

by CORD JEFFERSON

Can this on-again, off-again trucker protest in D.C. get any fucking weirder than it already is? Yes, because anything is possible with speed. Despite one of the protest’s organizers saying yesterday that the “Truckers Ride for the Constitution” rally was all a lie from the start, a rival organizer now says the protest is moving forward as planned. Oh, and President Obama is Osama bin Laden.

This morning, Louisiana news station WAFB9 published an interview with protest co-organizer Zeeda Andrews, who said unequivocally that Truckers Ride for the Constitution is still happening. Andrews’ remarks fly in direct opposition to those of Earl Conlon, who only yesterday told the Washington Post that the protest was all a hoax designed to get a rise out of “the mainstream media.” Like the Hatfield-McCoy rift of old, there now exists in Truckers Ride for the Constitution warring factions, and Andrews says Conlon is a jumped-up pretender. “Earl has never been authorized as a spokesperson,” Andrews told WAFB9. “As a matter of fact, he’s not riding in the convoy.”

In conjunction with Andrews’ latest comments—and her recent Fox News appearances—Media Matters has put together a closer look the former country singer’s political activism, which seems to be a nice mélange of right-wing shouting, Islamophobia, and crackpot conspiracy theorizing a la Alex Jones:

On her Facebook page, Andrews identifies as a fan of two 9-11 conspiracy theory movies, a documentary that postulates that the government may be secretly injecting aluminum into the atmosphere to block the sun’s rays, and a film based on the lectures of British conspiracy theorist David Icke, who believes a secret race of lizard people run the world. (Radio host Peter Santilli, who has appeared in press reports as a spokesperson for the event, is also a 9-11 conspiracy theorist. Santilli made news earlier this year when he suggested Hillary Clinton should be “shot in the vagina” for treason.)

And that’s not all. According to one of Andrews’ YouTube comments left earlier this year on a video about the Benghazi attack, Andrews has developed a theory that President Obama is actually the dead terrorist Osama bin Laden. She’s analyzed the ears, you see:

The fact that these soldiers were set up to die in a no return operation is obvious they had knowledge that Obama didn’t want leaked. This is the Seals that killed Osama Bin Laden. I don’t believe this story. He is alive call me crazy but, Osama Bin Laden is our President Obama do your research. The CIA has been preparing for this since he was a boy. They have same height, bone structure, hands and ears both are left handed the Osama face was created by Hollywood. The fox is in the hen house.

The fox is in the hen house! Code red! Code red! Everyone get your trucks to D.C. this weekend! The truth must be known! Benghazi!
 
New theories about the Bin Laden raid. The gist is that the Pakistanis knew about his presence and made a deal with the U.S. for him to be whisked off and then - after a few days - they'd claim he'd been struck by a drone attack somewhere in the Hindu Kush. For reasons unclear, the U.S. reneged on the deal and announced his death early and dropped the cover story. There's quite a lot more, and surprisingly it's all by a respected writer:

The Killing of Osama bin Laden
Seymour M. Hersh

lg.php

It’s been four years since a group of US Navy Seals assassinated Osama bin Laden in a night raid on a high-walled compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. The killing was the high point of Obama’s first term, and a major factor in his re-election. The White House still maintains that the mission was an all-American affair, and that the senior generals of Pakistan’s army and Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) were not told of the raid in advance. This is false, as are many other elements of the Obama administration’s account. The White House’s story might have been written by Lewis Carroll: would bin Laden, target of a massive international manhunt, really decide that a resort town forty miles from Islamabad would be the safest place to live and command al-Qaida’s operations? He was hiding in the open. So America said.

The most blatant lie was that Pakistan’s two most senior military leaders – General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, chief of the army staff, and General Ahmed Shuja Pasha, director general of the ISI – were never informed of the US mission. This remains the White House position despite an array of reports that have raised questions, including one by Carlotta Gall in the New York Times Magazine of 19 March 2014. Gall, who spent 12 years as the Times correspondent in Afghanistan, wrote that she’d been told by a ‘Pakistani official’ that Pasha had known before the raid that bin Laden was in Abbottabad. The story was denied by US and Pakistani officials, and went no further. In his book Pakistan: Before and after Osama (2012), Imtiaz Gul, executive director of the Centre for Research and Security Studies, a think tank in Islamabad, wrote that he’d spoken to four undercover intelligence officers who – reflecting a widely held local view – asserted that the Pakistani military must have had knowledge of the operation. The issue was raised again in February, when a retired general, Asad Durrani, who was head of the ISI in the early 1990s, told an al-Jazeera interviewer that it was ‘quite possible’ that the senior officers of the ISI did not know where bin Laden had been hiding, ‘but it was more probable that they did [know]. And the idea was that, at the right time, his location would be revealed. And the right time would have been when you can get the necessary quid pro quo – if you have someone like Osama bin Laden, you are not going to simply hand him over to the United States.’

Continued at length:
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v37/n10/seymour-m-hersh/the-killing-of-osama-bin-laden
 
Very interesting.

No burial at sea after all. I always knew that photo of everyone watching the raid live was a phoney. Amateur hour Photoshop work.
 
Was just about to post this!
Very interesting.
'In war, truth is the first casualty...' and such.
 
Back
Top