- Aug 3, 2001
- Reaction score
The official website:The "very big secret", according to the movie, is that there was one witness to the fatal car accident: a girl called Rita whom Paul McCartney had picked up on the way home, and who jumped on her very famous chaffeur when she recognised him causing the crash. "Rita" is said to have survived and in the cover up operation was given plastic surgery, and a name change to "Heather Mills"[Insert laughter at this point]. According to the documentary, she re-connected with "Paul" McCartney in 1993 and threatened to expose him as "Faul" unless he married her, hence her losing her leg in a police motorcycle accident, which was "really" just a result of an attempt to silence her. Clearly bewildered by whether this film is 'for real', I continue to prod the tight-lipped Joel about the discrepancies with his 'documentary'.
So basically that translates as, if this is all true, then John, George and Ringo were massive cocks who delighted in the prospect of the mass suicide of Beatles fans...British intelligence, MI5, had forced the Beatles to cover up McCartney's death to prevent mass suicides of Beatle fans. However, the remaining Beatles tried to signal fans with clues on album covers and in songs.
He's the Nestene Consciousness Auton clone.Mythopoeika said:So if Paul is dead, who is the guy who's still walking about, doing major concerts, availing himself of Paul's wealth, hobnobbing with the great and good etc...?
You don't really think that there aren't theories about that, too?Mythopoeika said:So if Paul is dead, who is the guy who's still walking about, doing major concerts, availing himself of Paul's wealth, hobnobbing with the great and good etc...?
Full article:‘THE BEATLES NEVER EXISTED’ IS THE GREATEST, WEIRDEST BEATLES CONSPIRACY THEORY OF ALL TIME
You think you know the truth about The Beatles? I laugh at your ignorance! Perhaps you naively proclaim that “Paul is dead!” but you have no idea. Wake up, sheeple! Paul never even existed! The rest of ‘em, too! At least, this is the claim made by the batshit-crazy/amazing conspiracy website, The Beatles (as they were presented to us) Never Existed. This is truly the holy grail of music conspiracy sites; it appears it is an ongoing project—Alex Jones style—and the theory is premised entirely on the scrutiny of photographic “evidence.”
This is a serious subject, not a joke, and this site is here to expose the actions of those who exploited these young men and defrauded us their fans. It is to defend the honor of everyone involved who did not take part in it willingly. It has become apparent to us in this extensive and painstaking research that there were never just four individual people known as “John”, “Paul”, “George”, and “Ringo” who comprised one Rock & Roll band known as “The Beatles”, and rose to fame as the world’s first supergroup. For all intents and purposes as far as we can tell, no one such group ever existed.
We are here to explore whether the original individuals themselves ever existed (and if so, what may have happened to them and by whom), but have not been able thus far to calculate how many of each persona were fraudulently presented to the world. Please join us at the forum if you care to and can be open-minded. This is a highly-emotional topic for many of us, and most of us have very strong feelings about it. We have started this work because we were once fans to varying degrees, and many of us still listen to and enjoy their music.
So yeah, The Beatles were a series of individuals imitating personas. It’s theorized that this is because four lone human beings couldn’t possibly produce the work of such a prolific band, much less meet all their social/media obligations. The blog concedes an uncanny resemblance between various Beatle bodies, but suggests that clones might have been used to keep up the charade.
It's the drugs, maaaan.I only just heard of this conspiracy, believe it or not. Having had a look at loads of links about the possibility of there being more than one Paul, for whatever reason, I must conclude that he does look VERY strange at times post 1966, almost like another person. Not consistent in appearance, either, like something is "off".
I only just heard of this conspiracy, believe it or not. Having had a look at loads of links about the possibility of there being more than one Paul, for whatever reason, I must conclude that he does look VERY strange at times post 1966, almost like another person. Not consistent in appearance, either, like something is "off".
One night in 1985, I had a dream that Phil Collins was actually the devil, hiding in plain sight and throwing everyone off the scent with his bland pop tunes and friendly demeanor.Well Gabriel and Fripp are class acts.
I see PHIL COLLINS is getting off easy then.
Was discussing this with hubby yesterday (inspired by the Beatles Christmas gifts he received - he's a huge fan). Well, hubs thinks McCartney's younger looking appearance stemmed from being free from the stress of being in the Beatles, but I wonder if didn't have to do with his becoming a vegetarian. I looked it up and apparently he and Linda became vejos in the mid-70's. Or maybe it was a combination of those things? Easier to believe than him being dead, at any rate.I used to think Phil Collins was the Devil without the aid of nightmares at bedtime, but now he makes me laugh. Anyway, for a while post-Beatles I thought Paul McCartney was actually looking younger and younger, check out some of his 1970s-early 80s videos and see what I mean.
Definitely not dead.
In that vein, if anyone gets the chance, the final scene of the last episode of Brian Pern was brilliant!One night in 1985, I had a dream that Phil Collins was actually the devil, hiding in plain sight and throwing everyone off the scent with his bland pop tunes and friendly demeanor.
So much work is poured into proving Paul is dead, yet no one bothers to research Phil Collins' evil influence. But of course, that's just the way he wants it.