Sorry, Escargot, I just have to ask—please forgive me, especially if you've already told us and I missed it somehow—but who or what does the invisible flying all-seeing woman who visits from the Spirit World have public sex with? An invisible flying all-seeing Adonis? A chihuahua? Spam on a hoagie roll? Does this supposedly take place where he works? At a pub? In the ice cream section of the Iceland Supermarket?
*holding head shaking in hands emoticon*He told me she has sex 'in the windows' of the office block opposite our building, with the lights on.
I'm assuming it's doggy-style, with her face pressed mockingly against the glass in full view. Her partners are apparently flesh and blood men but I dunno where she meets them.
As the whole scenario is a figment of Mr A's imagination there's no necessity for logic.
He certainly believes it though. When I'd go to put a light on in our 'brew room' he'd shout 'Don't! She'll see you!' He'd seem about to grab me.
Deffo looney tunes.He told me she has sex 'in the windows' of the office block opposite our building, with the lights on.
I'm assuming it's doggy-style, with her face pressed mockingly against the glass in full view. Her partners are apparently flesh and blood men but I dunno where she meets them.
As the whole scenario is a figment of Mr A's imagination there's no necessity for logic.
He certainly believes it though. When I'd go to put a light on in our 'brew room' he'd shout 'Don't! She'll see you!' He'd seem about to grab me.
Deffo looney tunes.
A man with paranoid schizophrenia who killed three elderly men wrongly thinking they were sex offenders or serial murderers has been found not guilty of their murders by reason of insanity and will be detained in a secure hospital.
Alexander Lewis-Ranwell was having acute psychotic delusions when he used a hammer and spade to kill Anthony Payne, 80, and twins Dick and Roger Carter, 84, at their homes in Exeter, believing that he was acting with the police’s blessing because he had just been freed on bail following an earlier violent attack.
During the trial there was no dispute that he killed the three men. The case centred on whether he knew that what he was doing was legally and morally wrong. The jury ruled that he did not and cleared him of three murders.
Rock, paper, scissors, adjustable spanner (that you only had on you because of your bike maintenance) .. you can apologise to a judge later.
I'm taking the Fifth on that.Are you Unison?
Always.Fifth what?
Gin and tonic?
Seems Mr Angry was banned from some company offices in his last job because he made the women there so uncomfortable with his conversations ..
If anyone's still interested, I've just had a very cheering phone call from a colleague, all about Mr Angry and his previous interactions with women.
Colleague was chatting with someone from another company who kindly asked about me. Colleague mentioned my trouble at work.
'Ooh', says Other Lady, 'THAT Mr Angry! I know ALL about HIM!'
Seems Mr Angry was banned from some company offices in his last job because he made the women there so uncomfortable with his conversations. He is widely believed to be obsessed with women and infidelity and the female staff were afraid of him.
The Other Lady immediately offered to tell my boss about it, and my lovely colleague handed over her phone and they talked. The woman who was most directly affected will be asked to contact him too and it seems she will happily do this.
I am bowled over! Lots of other people are afraid of him but I'm the only one to kick off. Now I find it's all happened before but he was still taken on. I am SO going to arm my Rep with this.
My experience of situations like this in the workplace or in "real" life is that there is ALWAYS a previous history.
@escargot - I did a 10 year stint in the court service (Magistrates), and for my last few years there I was also a Union Rep (only a fledgling in my case), and your particular nightmare sounds like it should have been a done and sealed deal a loooong time ago - it ticks every 'nope' box on every checklist I ever saw! I hope this new break finally gets this matter resolved properly for you and others affected by it!
My experience of situations like this in the workplace or in "real" life is that there is ALWAYS a previous history.
Well, I'd been complaining to my boss - once in writing - for over 2 years but nobody seemed able to do anything so I was being fobbed off. Nothing was ever going to happen until I made it official. Once I did the union jumped to it.
Yes, spot-on! It doesn't come out of thin air.
We'd heard vague rumours but nothing substantial. Now I can prove Mr A was dumped on us to save another company's staff from harassment, even though everyone knows women work here too.
Quite frankly I consider it disgraceful that companies and institutions take the default position of fobbing off and hoping everything goes away. Exactly what happened in the case of the violent child fiddler schoolteacher I came up against a few years ago, until I backed everyone (including the Police) into such a tight corner that they had no option to do something. It backfired onto all the institutions involved, taking up I suspect 1000's of man hours of their time. Will they have learned anything from their experience? Very unlikely indeed and I doubt your company will be any different.
Hope everything gets resolved quickly for you E.
Is the other company a sister company of yours?Thank you! Yup, if the other company thought they'd saved themselves some trouble by firing Mr A off to my building they've got another think coming. I intend to pull the ceiling down on those bastards' heads.
Is the other company a sister company of yours?
It troubles me that social media ends up being the go-to solution for getting this information to those who need it. Social media is so easily abused by anyone with a grudge. Having a more responsive social care system would protect the vulnerable people depending on care takers and the care takers as well. It would also be less likely that your information could be dismissed as just rumor mongering.
Are there licensing requirements for people who work in such facilities? Is there a way your neighbor could be prevented from qualifying for such jobs, or is this job just a low status, low paying position for those who can't get work elsewhere?
Are there licensing requirements for people who work in such facilities? Is there a way your neighbor could be prevented from qualifying for such jobs, or is this job just a low status, low paying position for those who can't get work elsewhere?