I'm not seeing that, but I do see a very crooked nose and an exagerrated 'Kirk Douglas' chin though.If he's looking to his right, he has a monstrous eye!
I found this one on the internet, seen it several times, it's just one of those random samples of leaves, shadows and pareidolia, I think.It looks very fake.
I found this one on the internet, seen it several times, it's just one of those random samples of leaves, shadows and pareidolia, I think.
It appears that the beveling in the garage door might be affecting the shadows?Could be genuine, but my instincts tell me it's just too 'neat'.
I have the same thought. The excessive detailing, to me, makes me question it. The lips, nose, philtrumCould be genuine, but my instincts tell me it's just too 'neat'.
I get around a bit, Michael.Looks a lot like Salmonellus' avatar to me.
I suspect that everyone is now making these silly pics.
This, absolutely for certain!
In fact I must say it looked just a little too good to be true. I therefore feel that it's had a bit of tweeking & tidying done on it (and ELA perhaps can be seen to agree with me)
https://fotoforensics.com/errorlevelanalysis.php?/
View attachment 65198
View attachment 65199
As long as he's not the Centaur of attraction.
Oh wow Mytho! Amazing pic! I really really did have to look at that photo a long time before I got it. Damn freaky!!
I'm the proud owner of this pebble that the Mrs found on our local beach around 2016. I was with her when she found it. After getting into a couple of local newspapers (with a billboard poster which we've got somewhere), it got itself into Fortean Times magazine. I think it looks more like Jim Morrison in his heroin abuse years. I've still got it in a little box on top of our fireplace. If you rub your thumb over the surface, the 'face' part bulges out.Oh wow Mytho! Amazing pic! I really really did have to look at that photo a long time before I got it. Damn freaky!!
I remember that one being in FT a few years ago, it's a favourite of mine, it's so good
I can't get past the huge face to make out what it actually is. A double exposure for sure, but what? A bill (money)? I can see the letters and watermark?
I don't think so. The man seems to be holding a small child dressed in white with a bucket hat. The child forms the "face". I am not sure about the "hair" though.I can't get past the huge face to make out what it actually is. A double exposure for sure, but what? A bill (money)? I can see the letters and watermark?
The "hair" is just some bushes, the same as on the right-hand side of the woman. It took me ages to figure it out. What a strange picture. Love it!I don't think so. The man seems to be holding a small child dressed in white with a bucket hat. The child forms the "face". I am not sure about the "hair" though.
Appears to seem as though the man and the woman in the background have masks on their faces - if it was just one that looked like that, I would dismiss it as a photo blip, but both?
Here is an image where it should be easier to see the two adults and the child with hat.Appears to seem as though the man and the woman in the background have masks on their faces - if it was just one that looked like that, I would dismiss it as a photo blip, but both?
To me, it looks as though it might be a picture from 1861 Civil War (America), the two people seem to be in a trench maybe looking after dead or injured soldiers? "Just a guess though." The double-take might be a close-up photo of one of the dead?
Miles out on that one!Here is an image where it should be easier to see the two adults and the child with hat.
View attachment 65646
Thanks for that. Now I've seen the child I can't un see it.Here is an image where it should be easier to see the two adults and the child with hat.
When I first saw your post I saw the child straight away and though 'good old Gordon' because I couldn't see that in the original post by Mytho.Here is an image where it should be easier to see the two adults and the child with hat.
View attachment 65646