Population Growth: The Real Apocalypse

AlchoPwn

Public Service is my Motto.
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
1,604
Likes
2,194
Points
154
And what do women in third world countries have to do with constant asexual reproduction as Alcopwn suggests or with ARGH FEMINAZIS as Enola Gaia suggests? o_O
In case you haven't noticed, there has been a steady increase in female education in the developing world, and it is slowly applying some brakes to population growth. I never suggested that reproduction was asexual, but, educated women are less likely to breed as they don't want to spend their lives taking care of chilcren, and are more likely to understand and choose to use contraception.
 

Min Bannister

Justified & Ancient
Joined
Sep 5, 2003
Messages
3,595
Likes
3,242
Points
184
In case you haven't noticed, there has been a steady increase in female education in the developing world, and it is slowly applying some brakes to population growth. I never suggested that reproduction was asexual, but, educated women are less likely to breed as they don't want to spend their lives taking care of chilcren, and are more likely to understand and choose to use contraception.
Sure but in case you have forgotten what you wrote, here it is again:-

For example, female education does provide a brake on population growth to some degree, but what about women who are just naturally stupid and fecund and won't keep their legs crossed?
Those naturally stupid women can keep their legs open all they want but they will be unable to chug out any babies unless naturally stupid men have unprotected sex with them.

Tl;dr - it takes two to tango.
I've consistently witnessed these exact three vectors in publicly espoused reactions on reproductive and gender issues, dating back to the sometimes riotous contraception debates in the 1960's.
On here? I have only ever seen that sort of stuff trotted out on here by men, claiming that is what women say. No women on here say it. The only people on here who talk about hating men are men and a very small minority of men at that. Do you hate yourselves? It is very tiresome.
 

AnonyJoolz

Captainess Sensible
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
742
Likes
1,981
Points
134
Location
Having a nice cup of tea and a sit-down.
It's because, in 3rd world countries in particular, women don't have equality. Educate them about their life choices and they may not have so many babies. There would be some form of rebellion against being baby making machines. At least, that's the idea.
The predicted rise in global population is mainly caused by older people not dying sooner due to better medical care; the global children-per-woman figure is almost down to replacement levels at 2.44 (in 2016) and may well fall further. Many 'third world' countries have similar child-per-woman stats as the developed world, particularly in parts of Asia, where education for girls has really been promoted, as has the message of the desirability of small families. Cf Nepal 2.12 to Netherlands 1.75 in 2016, for example.

However there does remain the thorny issue in that Muslim-majority countries are tending to consistently give birth to multiple children and this may well have implications for the world demographic as a whole. However female rights and education could act against this.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN

I can recommend Prof. Hans Rosling's documentary about population that challenges our belief about the effects of various assumptions we make about population growth: The short version is that it's the number of people using the highest level of resources we have to worry about, and that the global population has to take a step down from being uber-consumers in order to survive.


 
Last edited:

eburacum

Papo-furado
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
3,228
Likes
1,173
Points
169
The late Prof Rosling was my hero, as you may have noticed.
Brownmane said:
Third world countries are still scrabbling to survive and have few resources for much else.
They are scrabbling to survive, but they have plenty of resources. The continent of Africa as a whole, for example, has sufficient water for its needs, unlike the continent of North America, which is in a state of constant water famine.

This is the so called Resource Curse, and it is basically caused by kleptocracy and trade imbalances.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse
 

AlchoPwn

Public Service is my Motto.
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
1,604
Likes
2,194
Points
154
Sure but in case you have forgotten what you wrote, here it is again:- Those naturally stupid women can keep their legs open all they want but they will be unable to chug out any babies unless naturally stupid men have unprotected sex with them.
Remember, half of all people have an IQ below 100, and and IQ of 100 is already pretty dumb. So yeah, the 50% of the female population for whom education simply doesn't take (the half who are dumber than the other half) do tend to add "meaning" to their lives by overproducing children from what I have observed of the human condition. Nature's little miracles are pretty thick under foot in dumbdumb-land.

Tl;dr - it takes two to tango.
So you've never heard of artificial insemination? It doesn't take 2 to tango on this issue anymore. The courts have also stripped men of any say whatsoever in a mother's choice to have or not have a baby, despite thefact that the guys were also responsible for producing the child and will be responsible for paying for raising them. Nope, the courts just pick your pocket. Again, that's a pretty 1-sided tango these days and I'm very glad I didn't trigger that trap; it's a full-on life wrecker that I want no part of.

On here? I have only ever seen that sort of stuff trotted out on here by men, claiming that is what women say. No women on here say it. The only people on here who talk about hating men are men and a very small minority of men at that. Do you hate yourselves? It is very tiresome.
Well, let's just say that life as a single man is pretty blissful, and I'd never trade it for marriage, which is such a brittle and obsolete institution these days. As far as I am concerned women have priced themselves out of the market. As for children, well, they're okay I guess, but they do constitute a fairly boring hobby for the first 15 years of their lives, then just when they start to have opinions worth listening to, you get a 3 year window, then they're packed off to college. I just short circuited the process and went to work at a college.
 
Last edited:

AlchoPwn

Public Service is my Motto.
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
1,604
Likes
2,194
Points
154
@AlchoPwn - I know you love a good wind up but I can't really be bothered to play any more. :hoff:
In other words, you can't really make a solid argument against my position, and I make you philosophically uncomfortable because I don't validate your life choices and social programming. Don't worry, I have that affect on women.
 

brownmane

Abominable Snowman
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
521
Likes
965
Points
93
Location
Ontario, Canada
The late Prof Rosling was my hero, as you may have noticed.

They are scrabbling to survive, but they have plenty of resources. The continent of Africa as a whole, for example, has sufficient water for its needs, unlike the continent of North America, which is in a state of constant water famine.

This is the so called Resource Curse, and it is basically caused by kleptocracy and trade imbalances.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse
I was not referring to land resources, I was referring more to the poor people who expend more energy to just survive daily and their fight to improve their situations. They may have water resources, but the ability and ease to access clean water is another issue or to access other resources, such as housing and education.

Sorry I see I used the word "countries" when I should have been more specific and said people.
 

brownmane

Abominable Snowman
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
521
Likes
965
Points
93
Location
Ontario, Canada
As far as I am concerned women have priced themselves out of the market
I have never asked a guy to buy me anything (other than a b-day gift). I pay my own way, thanks.:cat:

And it is being discussed that in the future, men may not have to be used for fertilization. That in itself might keep the population at bay.:jtease:
 

AlchoPwn

Public Service is my Motto.
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
1,604
Likes
2,194
Points
154
I have never asked a guy to buy me anything (other than a b-day gift). I pay my own way, thanks.:cat:
Great! Keep it up.

And it is being discussed that in the future, men may not have to be used for fertilization. That in itself might keep the population at bay.:jtease:
Or completely end the species. But really, who cares? Society is atomizing under the forces of individualist alienation, and technology is pushing the process along rapidly. The logical outcome of all life is ultimately eventually extinction. It's the classic trap of giving people exactly what they want and watching them kill themselves with it. Really, that's okay tho because if life is meaningless, then so is death.
:jtease:
 

INT21

Antediluvian
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
5,534
Likes
4,002
Points
229
..The predicted rise in global population is mainly caused by older people not dying sooner due to better medical ..

No it isn't , any more than replacement numbers will cause an increase even if every one died at 60.

INT21
 

EnolaGaia

I knew the job was dangerous when I took it ...
Staff member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
12,530
Likes
14,144
Points
309
Location
Out of Bounds
I was not referring to land resources, I was referring more to the poor people who expend more energy to just survive daily and their fight to improve their situations. They may have water resources, but the ability and ease to access clean water is another issue or to access other resources, such as housing and education. ...
As long as daily life in a particular locale or setting involves considerable reliance on basic human effort, there will continue to be a tacit motivation to enhance one's household's (or village's; etc.) labor reservoir by adding children. Consider the longstanding meme or conventional wisdom that large families are a means to facilitate effective, if not expanded, farming.

This is a sort of steady-state situation in the sense it expands a certain layer or stratum of the labor force without necessarily fostering mobility out of that stratum. Phrased another way - improving the situation is not the objective.

Meanwhile, the purported profits from resource riches have rarely been significantly directed to improving the situations of the overall population and / or providing the opportunities to bootstrap oneself out of the strata where child production has traditionally been construed as valuable.
 

INT21

Antediluvian
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
5,534
Likes
4,002
Points
229
AlchoPwn,

...
Again, that's a pretty 1-sided tango these days and I'm very glad I didn't trigger that trap; it's a full-on life wrecker that I want no part of...

Definitely a MGTOW
 

INT21

Antediluvian
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
5,534
Likes
4,002
Points
229
Enola Gaia,

..
This is a sort of steady-state situation in the sense it expands a certain layer or stratum of the labor force without necessarily fostering mobility out of that stratum. Phrased another way - improving the situation is not the objective.

Quite clearly so. But your argument does not address the common situation where there are very many people hanging around with nothing to do. Many on land that they could bring into productivity if they only organised themselves.
Often these places are, quite literally, shitholes. With piles of rubbish everywhere, open sewers or people just crapping where ever the urge takes them.
And in the case of many African states, the only thing in common is that they are heavily armed and run buy a few well heeled gangsters who hold the top positions.


Really just 21 Century tribalism.

INT21
 
Last edited:

Mungoman

Mostly harmless...
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
2,336
Likes
3,670
Points
159
Location
In the Bush (Peak Hill, NSW)
I recently had access to a breakdown of my DNA concerning ethnicity. Interesting. I have a 4% linkage to the Indian Sub Continent, a 5% linkage to the Iberian Peninsula, 3% to the Caucasus and the usual Norway, Scotland, Ireland and east Midlands.

Through a family tree (thanks to my Daughter, Faith, and the wonders of genealogists everywhere) It has also introduced me to the vagaries of life as far back as the late 1500's so far.

Some women died at 50...after a lifetime of childbirth, I would imagine (most births from one poor woman -15) the men at 40 or so (occupational hazards) - but those that survived, more then two thirds lived past 70, with one dying in the late 1600's at 92. Those that did die early were of stock from the midlands predominantly, with the longer aged being from Haddington East Lothian, Chesire and Alnwick.

It HAS been an eye opener.
 

AlchoPwn

Public Service is my Motto.
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
1,604
Likes
2,194
Points
154
AlchoPwn, Again, that's a pretty 1-sided tango these days and I'm very glad I didn't trigger that trap; it's a full-on life wrecker that I want no part of...
Definitely a MGTOW
Now that I have looked it up, I can certainly sympathize with all those MGTOWs. Thanks for clueing me in to their existence.

With regards to parenthood, as Rust Cole/Pizzolato puts it "I think of the hubris it must take, to yank a sole out of nonexistence into this meat; a force of life into this thresher." is something more parents should be forced to confront. While some people can say that parenthood is a wonderful, life-affirming, and positive experience, nobody really puts enough of a case for the negative, and there are HUGE negatives.
 
Last edited:

EnolaGaia

I knew the job was dangerous when I took it ...
Staff member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
12,530
Likes
14,144
Points
309
Location
Out of Bounds
... Quite clearly so. But your argument does not address the common situation where there are very many people hanging around with nothing to do. ...
This is a different factor relating to the outcome (generating more worker bees than requirements demand) rather than the basic scenario.

This excess beyond requirements is evident to me worldwide, not just in those areas where basic human physical effort is a fundamental and critical resource.
 

INT21

Antediluvian
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
5,534
Likes
4,002
Points
229
AlchoPwn,

..nobody really puts enough of a case for the negative, and there are HUGE negatives. ..

Got to agree.
 

INT21

Antediluvian
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
5,534
Likes
4,002
Points
229
Mungoman,

Yes, family trees are always interesting. I suspect my earlier family will have ties to Eastern Europe. One day I may send of for the kit and see what they say. Whatever is shows, I am what I am.

Going back to the family sizes. Infant mortality, very hard work conditions and wars, disease etc did hold the population count down.
These days there is no need for the large family as a means to look after the farm etc. One man with a tractor and the attachments is all that is needed. This allows the farm to produce than needed for immediate consumption and thus for trade.

The future will tend more towards this 'no work' situation. Of course, there will always be some things that will need direct hands-on attention. But it will steadily reduce.

And not everyone is suited to being a computer programmer. So what is left ?

In the ideal world the machines and the people who service them should be able to provide for the rest. I mean, what else are machines for ? But it won't turn out that way.

Everything will gravitate to a privileged few. The rest will be on subsistence level income.

A gradual reduction in population will help resolve this problem. There will be (should be) less of those in the 'left behind' group.

But it all depends upon a more equitable division of the products of the machine labour.

And, of course, all the above only applies to the West. The countries who are completely controlled by hard line religions or similar bounds will go to Hell in a handcart; possibly taking the rest of us with them.

INT21.
 

blessmycottonsocks

Justified & Ancient
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
3,111
Likes
4,458
Points
154
Location
Wessex and Mercia
Another manifestation of gross overpopulation in the UK is that an acute water shortage is looming:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47620228

But rather than do something sensible like strive to limit our population to a more sustainable level, the emphasis will be very much on discouraging water use.
Obviously the cost per cubic metre will go up substantially and all new-build houses will presumably be equipped with a shower-room rather than a bathroom.
 

Mythopoeika

I am a meat popsicle
Joined
Sep 18, 2001
Messages
35,868
Likes
21,954
Points
309
Location
Inside a starship, watching puny humans from afar
Another manifestation of gross overpopulation in the UK is that an acute water shortage is looming:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47620228

But rather than do something sensible like strive to limit our population to a more sustainable level, the emphasis will be very much on discouraging water use.
Obviously the cost per cubic metre will go up substantially and all new-build houses will presumably be equipped with a shower-room rather than a bathroom.
Yes. And here we are, importing people and building on every available plot of land.
 

blessmycottonsocks

Justified & Ancient
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
3,111
Likes
4,458
Points
154
Location
Wessex and Mercia
Control the population growth and you won't need the new build houses.
Exactly.
I was a paid-up Green Party/ Ecology Party member back in the Jonathon Porritt days, when they advocated a sustainable rate of population.
Sadly they subsequently sold out.
I know it's not the trendy thing to say, but pretty well every problem facing humanity today stems from overpopulation.
 

Mungoman

Mostly harmless...
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
2,336
Likes
3,670
Points
159
Location
In the Bush (Peak Hill, NSW)
Another manifestation of gross overpopulation in the UK is that an acute water shortage is looming:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47620228

But rather than do something sensible like strive to limit our population to a more sustainable level, the emphasis will be very much on discouraging water use.
Obviously the cost per cubic metre will go up substantially and all new-build houses will presumably be equipped with a shower-room rather than a bathroom.

I reckon that it's time to add a rainwater tank to, at least, every new built dwelling.
 

Mungoman

Mostly harmless...
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
2,336
Likes
3,670
Points
159
Location
In the Bush (Peak Hill, NSW)
Yes. And here we are, importing people and building on every available plot of land.

G'day Myth. Our federal government is importing 160,000 migrants every year, and is now trying to make it a prerecquisite that to get residency here, the new Australian and their family must live in a regional area for a specified time.

Regional and remote areas are not amused.
 

INT21

Antediluvian
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
5,534
Likes
4,002
Points
229
Such things do help, but they have to be managed.

I have a couple of hundred gallon of rainwater in butts. Use it mostly on the plants (I have a water meter) in summer.

But the biggest consumer of water in our home is the toilet. 9 litre per flush.

The water from the butts is quite suitable for that purpose and could be set up to supply the toilet.

Another project .

INT21.
 
Top