Star Trek

GNC

King-Sized Canary
Joined
Aug 25, 2001
Messages
28,170
Likes
13,148
Points
284
I wouldn't mind a look at it, but Netflix have their claws in it in the UK, I dunno, if it's not Sky it's that lot preventing me see the interesting stuff.
 

Bigphoot2

Not sprouts! I hate sprouts.
Joined
Jul 30, 2005
Messages
6,671
Likes
17,037
Points
294
I watched the first two episodes on Netflix and wasn't impressed. It just didn't feel like Star Trek. Classic Trek was optimistic and fun, this was all doom and gloom.
 

Shady

Mary Queen of Scots...temping as DEATHS Kitty
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
8,050
Likes
9,765
Points
284
STD really something you don't want then :eek

I've only seen clips and to be honest, it didn't inspire me to watch it
 

Anome

Bibliomancer
Joined
May 23, 2002
Messages
5,490
Likes
484
Points
164
Location
Left, and to the Back
I enjoyed it. I thought Michelle Yeoh was good, and had a good chemistry with Sonequa Martin-Green which mirrored what you'd expect from the relationship between their characters. I liked Doug Jones as the much more alien than usual Science Officer. Sonequa Martin-Green was OK, but I think her character hasn't been properly developed.

Writing had some issues. I don't mind that they're going dark, it's a side of the Federation that I think can be explored. I think using Sarek is a mistake. Sarek is an important part of the Trek lore, but there were other Vulcans who might have been used. Best solution is to come up with a new one, and maybe refer to Sarek occasionally, but don't make him a major character. Even worse than using Sarek, though, was making him a kind of Deus Ex Machina Jiminy Cricket through a previously unseen consequence of the Vulcan Mind Meld. The same result could have been achieved in a number of ways that wouldn't have been as silly.

The setting is another problem. We're wedging a lot of history into a small period before TOS. They've kind of given themselves a definite end point. While I don't expect them to last 10 series, I think it's a mistake to set it so close to the original. A better solution, as many people have said, is to go after Voyager. That way you don't risk getting things out of order, and the apparently more advanced tech doesn't look out of place (but I do like that they have TOS era Phasers and Communicators). Why didn't they have those Holograms in TOS? (I mean apart from budget constraints, and the practicality of creating such an effect in 1966.)

Also, while I liked her performance, I did think Michelle Yeoh was woefully underused. It's nice she got a chance to do some acting for a change, but I was really disappointed that she gets into hand to hand combat with a Klingon, and you can hardly see anything.
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Messages
8,865
Likes
10,789
Points
279
I liked it also. Nice to see Michelle Yeoh doing something more nuanced. I could care less about how it fits into the "ST universe", it worked well for me and I'll keep watching.
 

Swifty

doesn't negotiate with terriers
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
25,675
Likes
31,695
Points
284
This intro arty farty video's probably old news now then .. dunno .. as long as it's Whoopie Goldberg council committee light I might watch one of these ..

 

marksourbutts

Junior Acolyte
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
47
Likes
72
Points
34
I enjoyed it. I read an article today where the creators explained that the first two episodes are to be seen as a prologue to the show proper. Apparently episode 3 sees a small jump forward in time and our heroine gets posted to the titular ship.

Lots of criticism online of the level of technology. Don’t understand this, as if the tech was made to look like it did in the 1960s it would be laughable. I think sometimes people can get too caught up in nostalgia.

Mark
 

Anome

Bibliomancer
Joined
May 23, 2002
Messages
5,490
Likes
484
Points
164
Location
Left, and to the Back
I enjoyed it. I read an article today where the creators explained that the first two episodes are to be seen as a prologue to the show proper. Apparently episode 3 sees a small jump forward in time and our heroine gets posted to the titular ship.

Lots of criticism online of the level of technology. Don’t understand this, as if the tech was made to look like it did in the 1960s it would be laughable. I think sometimes people can get too caught up in nostalgia.

Mark
It's a delicate balance. Glitzing it up is OK, but introducing whole new tech (holographic communication, for example) is going a bit far. Still, as long as they don't go back to TOS and use CGI to replace the props and sets to match the new aesthetic. As you say, TOS was made in the 60s, and should be left as a 60s TV show. This is being made now, and should be made as a modern show.
 

Anome

Bibliomancer
Joined
May 23, 2002
Messages
5,490
Likes
484
Points
164
Location
Left, and to the Back
The visual effects of TOS have been updated with CGI, for the recent blu-ray releases....but not to replace anything, just update the effects as far as I know.

The same has been done with TNG, but DS9 can't get the same treatment... http://www.treknews.net/2017/02/02/why-ds9-voyager-not-on-blu-ray-hd/
I know some of the effects shots were, but I meant more like replacing the guns in E. T. with Walkie-Talkies, or having Boba Fett awkwardly walk into shot and out again, while a badly animated CGI alien replaces the human actor who was in the scene previously.

I understand the sales of the TOS and TNG remastered disks weren't high enough to convince them to do DS9 or V'GER. I'm torn between getting the TOS disks, or trying to get the old versions. Or just watching it on Netflix.
 

dreeness .

Justified & Ancient
Joined
Dec 12, 2014
Messages
1,071
Likes
961
Points
114
The visual effects of TOS have been updated with CGI, for the recent blu-ray releases....but not to replace anything, just update the effects as far as I know.

The same has been done with TNG, but DS9 can't get the same treatment... http://www.treknews.net/2017/02/02/why-ds9-voyager-not-on-blu-ray-hd/
It's jarring to watch the original series when they do that. Everything is 1967, and then suddenly you have all these incongruous CGI spaceships zipping around.

This was 1953:

This was 1933:

The best effects they could make, with all the skill and art of their time. Any modern attempts at "improvement" would seem very close to vandalism.
 

Timble2

Imaginary Person
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Messages
5,785
Likes
1,335
Points
234
Location
In a Liminal Zone
From the bits I've seen, the CGI effects are pretty feeble and make you think "that's really crap CGi", not how much of an improvement over the original model and optical effects they are.
 
Joined
Aug 19, 2003
Messages
48,861
Likes
20,951
Points
284
Location
Eblana
I've seen the first two episodes of Star Trek: Discovery. Just setting things up for the appearance of Discovery in Episode 3. New look Klingons. 7/10.
 
Top