• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

String Theory

Cavynaut

Gone But Not Forgotten
(ACCOUNT RETIRED)
Joined
Apr 10, 2003
Messages
2,306
After years trying to get my head around this, I might have been wasting my time. :(

Observer, Sunday October 8 2006
Robin McKie, science Editor
The most ambitious idea ever outlined by scientists has suffered a remarkable setback. It has been dismissed as a theoretical cul-de-sac that has wasted the academic lives of hundreds of the world's cleverest men and women. This startling accusation has been made by frustrated physicists, including several Nobel prize winners, who say that string theory - which seeks to (...)

more...

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/ ... 40,00.html
 
There have been critics of String Theory from the first time it was postulated.
The main problem with the earlier versions was that the theory predicted that several different types of universes could exist, with each of them having an equal probability of existing. There was no way to "choose" between a logically consistent universe (such as the one we (probably :p) exist in) and any other. "Several" meaning millions here.

So eventually the millions became 5, and those 5 were incorporated into the one model called "M Theory". And for a while, this was the main candidate for the "Theory of Everything". Then it was realised that M Theory could predict around 10500(?) different universes, each with different laws of physics. And again, no logical way to see why one in particular is favoured with existing.

So string theory has not given us a ToE yet. It is also unfalsifiable with our current equipment. Some would say that we will never be able to produce the kinds of energy needed to test it in our "atom smashers".

But in the meantime, it has definitely given mathematicans a huge plethora of new toys to play with, they don't care if the maths can be applied to the universe. :lol:
 
Yup. There is also ambiguity about mensurative criteria.

Physicists are working hard to answer the question, how long is a piece of string?
 
My father taught me the answer to that one as a kid - maybe I should pass the info on to a scientist?
 
Physicists are working hard to answer the question, how long is a piece of string?

A yes but Quantum Physicists are going one step further and asking the Question 'How wrong is a piece of string'.
 
I think that based on that web-comic, that String Theory is wrong and should be renamed Quantum Reciprocal Network Theory.
 
Just came across this article from last year and wondered if possibly interesting re this thread topic:

We Haven’t Been Zapped Out Of Existence Yet, So Other Dimensions Are Probably Super Tiny


In theory, other dimensions aren’t big enough to form black holes and consume our universe or it would have happened already

Source: smithsonianmag.com
Date: 8 October, 2018

The world as we know it has three dimensions of space—length, width and depth—and one dimension of time. But there’s the mind-bending possibility that many more dimensions exist out there. According to string theory, one of the leading physics model of the last half century, the universe operates with 10 dimensions. But that raises a big question: If there are 10 dimensions, then why don’t we experience all of them or haven’t detected them? Lisa Grossman at ScienceNews reports that a new paper suggests an answer, showing that those dimensions are so tiny and so fleeting that we currently can’t detect them.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smar...dimensions-are-probably-super-tiny-180970487/
 
Horton & who.jpg
 
This Live Science article provides an overview of string theory's predictions - specifically axions (universe-spanning threads) - and the prospects for finally detecting axions with telescopic equipment currently being built for deployment soon.
The Universe May Be Flooded with a Cobweb Network of Invisible Strings

We may soon find out whether we live in an axiverse.

What if I told you that our universe was flooded with hundreds of kinds of nearly invisible particles and that, long ago, these particles formed a network of universe-spanning strings?

It sounds both trippy and awesome, but it's actually a prediction of string theory, our best (but frustratingly incomplete) attempt at a theory of everything. These bizarre, albeit hypothetical, little particles are known as axions, and if they can be found, that would mean we all live in a vast "axiverse."

The best part of this theory is that it's not just some physicist's armchair hypothesis, with no possibility of testing. This incomprehensibly huge network of strings may be detectable in the near future with microwave telescopes that are actually being built. ...
FULL STORY: https://www.livescience.com/universe-filled-with-axion-strings.html
 
Why String Theory Is Both A Dream And A Nightmare

Source: Forbes
Date: 26 February, 2020

String theory is perhaps the most controversial big idea in all of science today. On the one hand, it’s a mathematically compelling framework that offers the potential to unify the Standard Model with General Relativity, providing a quantum description of gravity and providing deep insights into how we conceive of the entire Universe. On the other hand, its predictions are all over the map, untestable in practice, and require an enormous set of assumptions that are unsupported by an iota of scientific evidence.

For perhaps the last 35 years, string theory has been the dominant idea in theoretical particle physics, with more scientific papers arising from it than any other idea. And yet it has not produced even one testable prediction in all that time, leading many to decry that it hasn’t even risen to the standard of science. String theory is simultaneously one of the best ideas in the entire history of theoretical physics and one of our greatest disappointments. Here’s why.

https://www-forbes-com.cdn.ampproje...3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s
 
Why String Theory Is Both A Dream And A Nightmare

Source: Forbes
Date: 26 February, 2020

String theory is perhaps the most controversial big idea in all of science today. On the one hand, it’s a mathematically compelling framework that offers the potential to unify the Standard Model with General Relativity, providing a quantum description of gravity and providing deep insights into how we conceive of the entire Universe. On the other hand, its predictions are all over the map, untestable in practice, and require an enormous set of assumptions that are unsupported by an iota of scientific evidence.

For perhaps the last 35 years, string theory has been the dominant idea in theoretical particle physics, with more scientific papers arising from it than any other idea. And yet it has not produced even one testable prediction in all that time, leading many to decry that it hasn’t even risen to the standard of science. String theory is simultaneously one of the best ideas in the entire history of theoretical physics and one of our greatest disappointments. Here’s why.

https://www-forbes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/02/26/why-string-theory-is-both-a-dream-and-a-nightmare/amp/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA=#referrer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From %1$s&ampshare=https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/02/26/why-string-theory-is-both-a-dream-and-a-nightmare/amp/#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s
"The Trouble with Physics" by Lee Smolin said much the same but in 2006. I read it cover to cover in Amsterdam Airport, waiting for a plane which never came. Nothing's changed much since.
 
You mean the planes are still not coming?

It seems Lord Kelvin suggested atoms might be strings, with the different elements being different number of knots on the string.
 
How the universe could possibly have more dimensions

String theory is a purported theory of everything that physicists hope will one day explain … everything.

Source: space.com

All the forces, all the particles, all the constants, all the things under a single theoretical roof, where everything that we see is the result of tiny, vibrating strings. Theorists have been working on the idea since the 1960s, and one of the first things they realized is that for the theory to work, there have to be more dimensions than the four we're used to.

But that idea isn't as crazy as it sounds.

[...]

But for the math to work, there have to be more than four dimensions in our universe. This is because our usual space-time doesn't give the strings enough "room" to vibrate in all the ways they need to in order to fully express themselves as all the varieties of particles in the world. They're just too constrained.

In other words, the strings don't just wiggle, they wiggle hyperdimensionally.

Current versions of string theory require 10 dimensions total, while an even more hypothetical über-string theory known as M-theory requires 11. But when we look around the universe, we only ever see the usual three spatial dimensions plus the dimension of time. We're pretty sure that if the universe had more than four dimensions, we would've noticed by now.

How can the string theory's requirement for extra dimensions possibly be reconciled with our everyday experiences in the universe?

Thankfully, string theorists were able to point to a historical antecedent for this seemingly radical notion.

[...]

https://www.space.com/more-universe-dimensions-for-string-theory.html
 
String theorists have devised an alternative explanation for black holes ...
Black holes may not exist, but fuzzballs might, wild theory suggests

... Over the decades, theoretical physicists have been hard at work to find something — anything — to explain black holes. Something that explains the information paradox and something to replace the singularity with math that works.

Among those theorists are the ones working on string theory, which is a model of the universe that replaces all the particles and forces that you love with subatomic, vibrating strings. In string theory, these strings are the fundamental constituents of matter in the universe, but we can't see them as strings because they're so small. Oh, and in order for the math of string theory to work, there must be extra dimensions — all tiny any curled up on themselves to subatomic scales so that we don't see those, either.

String theory claims to be a theory of everything, capable of explaining every kind of particle, every kind of force, and basically everything in the universe (and, for completeness, the whole entire universe itself).

So string theory should be able to explain the unexplainable: it should be able to replace black holes with something less frightening.

And, indeed, string theorists have proposed a less-scary replacement for black holes. They're called fuzzballs. ...

FULL STORY: https://www.livescience.com/string-theory-fuzzballs-are-black-holes.html
 
Back
Top