• Server Outage Announcement

    Hello, Everyone.
    We will be installing an update to XenForo (the forums software), and doing some server maintenance.
    Consequently, the forums will be unavailable from about 12 - 2 MDT / 2 - 4 EDT / 6 - 8 GMT on Sunday 9th May 2021.

The Beechmount Poltergeist – A Belfast Story

Quercus

Devoted Cultist
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
104
Reaction score
660
Points
93
Location
Back of beyond
I've been trying to research a case on and off for a few years now - known locally as The Beechmount Poltergeist, sometimes also referred to as The Woman In Black.

It dates from 1989, and the events supposedly took place in a house in Beechmount Grove in West Belfast.

This is the book, written by the man who was seemingly the epicentre of the disturbances:

Number 91 - Front Cover sml.jpg


Number 91 - Rear Cover sml.jpg


It's far from the only monograph written by the person who claimed to be at the centre of a destructive haunting, but it really is one of the most unsual cases I've ever encountered.

Beginning in the summer of 1989, the series of events isn't really a poltergeist story in any traditional sense - rather, it's an account of how an apparition of a Victorian-looking woman in a black dress essentially invaded the Skillen family's 1970s council house one Friday evening, physically attacking the father, John Skillen, for reasons unknown.

Although certain elements of the phenomena reported are consistent with poltergeist cases, such as banging on the floors, heavy furniture moving across the room and doors opening and closing, the ongoing physical attacks on John Skillen remain the most disturbing elements of the account.

At the time it became something of a mania in the area, with crowds of hundreds gathered nightly alongside reporters and news crews on the scene, and various psychics and clergymen attending in an unsuccessful attempt to remove the presence from No. 91. An SPR investigator, Sheila St Clair, also became involved, having heard about the situation on a radio show.

Other than a single anonymised reference to the case in St Clair's 1994 publication Mysterious Ireland, I've found no other reference to the case anywhere else other than some lively discussion on Belfast Forum from users who are still split between those who believe it was all a load of nonsense made up by a family who wanted to be rehoused, and those who claim they were there or knew people who were, and absolutely vouch for the veracity of the tale.

This is what Sheila St Clair had to say, which is a decent synopsis of John Skillen's book:

To end this discussion of poltergeist manifestations, another case attracted attention barely six months after the last, but in the west side of Belfast. Again, it involved a family with children, ranging this time from five to fifteen. This case became well known locally as ‘The Woman in Black’ and attracted quite a lot of media and press attention. The location again was a small modern terrace house, built on the site of older buildings. The ‘radiant centre’ of this manifestation appeared to be the father of the family, who in the weeks that followed was assaulted at times so violently that it necessitated the family forsaking their home and going to stay with friends and neighbours for safekeeping. In the course of the disturbance water taps, lights, the doors and the furniture were interfered with, together with apparitional sightings and changes of temperature.

The most unpleasant of the phenomena which appeared to the man of the house and at times, to the eldest son, was ‘The Woman in Black’ – an apparition of a young woman dressed all in black and with a faintly Victorian air about her. This woman seemed to be particularly hostile towards the husband, and he was subject to beatings, being thrown over the banisters and knocked down the stairs. The entity took strong objection to certain items left in the house by the clergy and concerned neighbours. These included candles that had been blessed, rosaries and crucifixes.

After some of the more physically violent episodes, it became necessary for John S. and his wife to have protection from stout-hearted friends on a twenty-four hour basis until they quit the house. The apparition resisted any attempt to remove her, despite clerical intervention and a vigil being kept in the street by their Catholic neighbours. Mass was said in the house, and the celebrant himself could vouch for the sense of a hostile presence. Some of the neighbours began to fear for the sanctity of their own homes, as the disturbances began to spill over to neighbours on either side. The family’s belongings that remained in the house were frequently broken and destroyed.

It was imperative that the children be removed from this scene of violence, and in fact it would be difficult to assess how much trauma was suffered by them, not only from the psycho-kinetic energy expended but from the loss of their own home and separation, however temporary, from their parents. Several paranormalists investigated the site, but no conclusions were drawn. Even when the furore had died down and the house lay vacant, there was no guarantee that the manifestations had ceased. Understandably, it was some time before a tenant could be found to take on such a notorious dwelling. It may be that the phenomenon was linked only to the family of John S., as does occur in cases of this kind, and there seemed to be no history of disturbance before the family went to live in the house. Presumably, only time will tell if ‘The Woman in Black’ was a one-off event.

pp. 115-116, Mysterious Ireland, Sheila St Clair, 1994, Robert Hale Ltd, London
I've made approaches to the SPR's archivists to see if they hold any more information, but all they can advise is that the papers belonging to the late Mrs St Clair are 'probably' in their archives in Cambridge, but have not been catalogued, let alone digitised. I can of course make an appointment to go and view them, but... 2020 wasn't really a year for travelling.

I've also drawn a blank with BBC Radio Ulster, who interviewed John Skillen in late June 1989 about the occurrences; nor have I been able to track down any of the news articles (mostly sceptical) detailed in the book - but again, the archives of the Newspaper Library in central Belfast has been closed since last March.

Both John and Greta Skillen are now apparently deceased, and the Beechmount housing estate was levelled c.2000 and redeveloped.

Beechmount Grove, 1980s vs 2010s.jpg

I believe that No.91 Beechmount Grove is just out of shot on the far right of this picture - this photo shows about two-thirds of the six-dwelling terrace:

Beechmount Grove - No.91.jpg


One of the Skillen children does occasionally pop up on the Belfast Forum threads relating to the case, usually to request that forum members distributing PDF copies of the book refrain from doing so. They have stated:

I dont want the book circulated. This was a very tramatic time for myself and my family. It is nothing to do with money i do not want my own children to go through what we went through as children and are still going through as adults.
Which is understandable.

I've managed to track down an original copy of the book; it's a hard title to find as not only was it self-published in a small print run, but the glue used for binding wasn't great and most copies seemed to have fallen apart quite quickly.

What strikes me from the book's narrative is the sheer number of people mentioned, by name, who witnessed events or were otherwise present at the property during the time.

What I've also found out is that the house at Beechmount Grove was built on the site of a clay pit, which was part of a former brickworks, and not on the site of previous buildings as the St Clair account states. However, I've been having some difficulty in tracking down a map showing the area between 1970 and 2000 - OSNI's Historic Mapping seems to stop at 1968, while modern maps just show the redeveloped area.

05 Beechmount Area - OSNI Historic Mapping Fifth Edition 1919-63.png



06 Beechmount Area - OSNI Historic Mapping 1957-1986.png


07 Beechmount Area - OSNI Mapping 2020.png


With regard to the claims of 'they only did it to get rehoused', it's maybe worth mentioning that these were four-bed houses, the biggest in the estate. John Skillen mentions that they'd been on the Housing Executive list for many years before being allocated one, and claim to have been very happy and settled there for a number of years before the events of summer 1989 occurred. In West Belfast in the 1980s, there really wasn't anywhere sigificantly better to be rehoused.

Three subsequent families stayed at the address for no more than a few days before leaving.

It really is quite a singular case, and I'm kinda surprised that it remains so obscure. Hopefully I'll find out a bit more in time, and maybe give the story its own thread.
 

lordmongrove

Justified & Ancient
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
3,460
Reaction score
3,361
Points
169
I've been trying to research a case on and off for a few years now - known locally as The Beechmount Poltergeist, sometimes also referred to as The Woman In Black.

It dates from 1989, and the events supposedly took place in a house in Beechmount Grove in West Belfast.

This is the book, written by the man who was seemingly the epicentre of the disturbances:

View attachment 36723

View attachment 36725

It's far from the only monograph written by the person who claimed to be at the centre of a destructive haunting, but it really is one of the most unsual cases I've ever encountered.

Beginning in the summer of 1989, the series of events isn't really a poltergeist story in any traditional sense - rather, it's an account of how an apparition of a Victorian-looking woman in a black dress essentially invaded the Skillen family's 1970s council house one Friday evening, physically attacking the father, John Skillen, for reasons unknown.

Although certain elements of the phenomena reported are consistent with poltergeist cases, such as banging on the floors, heavy furniture moving across the room and doors opening and closing, the ongoing physical attacks on John Skillen remain the most disturbing elements of the account.

At the time it became something of a mania in the area, with crowds of hundreds gathered nightly alongside reporters and news crews on the scene, and various psychics and clergymen attending in an unsuccessful attempt to remove the presence from No. 91. An SPR investigator, Sheila St Clair, also became involved, having heard about the situation on a radio show.

Other than a single anonymised reference to the case in St Clair's 1994 publication Mysterious Ireland, I've found no other reference to the case anywhere else other than some lively discussion on Belfast Forum from users who are still split between those who believe it was all a load of nonsense made up by a family who wanted to be rehoused, and those who claim they were there or knew people who were, and absolutely vouch for the veracity of the tale.

This is what Sheila St Clair had to say, which is a decent synopsis of John Skillen's book:



I've made approaches to the SPR's archivists to see if they hold any more information, but all they can advise is that the papers belonging to the late Mrs St Clair are 'probably' in their archives in Cambridge, but have not been catalogued, let alone digitised. I can of course make an appointment to go and view them, but... 2020 wasn't really a year for travelling.

I've also drawn a blank with BBC Radio Ulster, who interviewed John Skillen in late June 1989 about the occurrences; nor have I been able to track down any of the news articles (mostly sceptical) detailed in the book - but again, the archives of the Newspaper Library in central Belfast has been closed since last March.

Both John and Greta Skillen are now apparently deceased, and the Beechmount housing estate was levelled c.2000 and redeveloped.

View attachment 36726
I believe that No.91 Beechmount Grove is just out of shot on the far right of this picture - this photo shows about two-thirds of the six-dwelling terrace:

View attachment 36727

One of the Skillen children does occasionally pop up on the Belfast Forum threads relating to the case, usually to request that forum members distributing PDF copies of the book refrain from doing so. They have stated:



Which is understandable.

I've managed to track down an original copy of the book; it's a hard title to find as not only was it self-published in a small print run, but the glue used for binding wasn't great and most copies seemed to have fallen apart quite quickly.

What strikes me from the book's narrative is the sheer number of people mentioned, by name, who witnessed events or were otherwise present at the property during the time.

What I've also found out is that the house at Beechmount Grove was built on the site of a clay pit, which was part of a former brickworks, and not on the site of previous buildings as the St Clair account states. However, I've been having some difficulty in tracking down a map showing the area between 1970 and 2000 - OSNI's Historic Mapping seems to stop at 1968, while modern maps just show the redeveloped area.

View attachment 36732


View attachment 36733

View attachment 36734

With regard to the claims of 'they only did it to get rehoused', it's maybe worth mentioning that these were four-bed houses, the biggest in the estate. John Skillen mentions that they'd been on the Housing Executive list for many years before being allocated one, and claim to have been very happy and settled there for a number of years before the events of summer 1989 occurred. In West Belfast in the 1980s, there really wasn't anywhere sigificantly better to be rehoused.

Three subsequent families stayed at the address for no more than a few days before leaving.

It really is quite a singular case, and I'm kinda surprised that it remains so obscure. Hopefully I'll find out a bit more in time, and maybe give the story its own thread.
Some bloody good work there!
 

Quercus

Devoted Cultist
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
104
Reaction score
660
Points
93
Location
Back of beyond
Dammit, I want a copy now :headbang:
Copies of Number 91 do still crop up for sale from time to time (hence my acquisition), but sadly the days of them changing hands for a tenner seems to be behind us.

Most secondhand bookshops seem to have twigged that they're fairly well sought after, and price them accordingly. It wasn't the most expensive book I've ever bought - but it's up there...

(It also stinks of cigarette smoke, to the point that I have to keep it in a sealed bag, along with a dessicant sachet.)

Every so often someone will appear on the Belfast Forum announcing that the book is about to be republished, and they're taking advance orders, or that they're going to read the book chapter by chapter on their YouTube channel, but so far nothing has transpired.

Some copies are available through public and private libraries in Northern Ireland, but are classed as heritage/reference and so can't be borrowed, just read in situ. One reader took that route, though obviously this becomes rather more challenging if you live outside the area.

The heritage copy of Number 91 held by the Linenhall Library in Belfast (Ireland's oldest private members' library, though open to the public to come in browse) is by now basically just a load of loose pages in an envelope - though interestingly, it is a presentation copy to the library, signed by John Skillen.

There's supposedly a way to read it via the OpenLibrary project, but I'm still somewhat confused as to whether it is or isn't available - the title is listed, but classified as 'not in library'. Possibly someone more familiar with OpenLibrary may be able to find out more.

It seems the surviving family members would prefer the whole episode to be forgotten about; which, of course, tends to pique the interest even more.

John Skillen clearly felt strongly enough about what happened to him and his family to go to the trouble of publishing a book on the matter, so clearly - at one point - he was keen for his experiences, as he perceived them, to be widely known and understood.

I think what interests me most is not just what is alleged to have happened - which has comparators to very well-known cases like the Enfield Poltergeist and the Black Monk of Pontefract - but why it remains very obscure in paranormal circles, yet still has enormous potency and strength of feeling within the local community, even thirty-odd years later.
 

catseye

Old lady trouser-smell
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
2,808
Reaction score
9,314
Points
219
Location
York
I think what interests me most is not just what is alleged to have happened - which has comparators to very well-known cases like the Enfield Poltergeist and the Black Monk of Pontefract - but why it remains very obscure in paranormal circles, yet still has enormous potency and strength of feeling within the local community, even thirty-odd years later.
Could some of the obscurity be to do with the times during which this was happening? Things weren't happy in Belfast in 1989 and events in that direction may have overshadowed paranormal events to some degree, and prevented research into the occurances.
 

Quercus

Devoted Cultist
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
104
Reaction score
660
Points
93
Location
Back of beyond
Are you sure? that looks dodgy. Have you downloaded it yourself?
As per the Opinionated Geek blog post linked upthread...

There are mutterings about a PDF version in circulation, and then further mutterings from the family of the author asking that the PDF not be spread around, and then lots of dodgy piracy sites catching on to the search term and polluting all search results for the book (try it if you don’t believe me). I wouldn’t be comfortable downloading a dodgy PDF of a book anyway.
I wish there was a cheap, easy and legal way to allow people to read this, but I'm not sure there is just yet.

But if there's a bit of interest in this case, then I should probably start a dedicated thread for expansion and further discussion.
 

gordonrutter

Within reason
Staff member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
5,468
Reaction score
8,857
Points
309
Copies of Number 91 do still crop up for sale from time to time (hence my acquisition), but sadly the days of them changing hands for a tenner seems to be behind us.

Most secondhand bookshops seem to have twigged that they're fairly well sought after, and price them accordingly. It wasn't the most expensive book I've ever bought - but it's up there...

(It also stinks of cigarette smoke, to the point that I have to keep it in a sealed bag, along with a dessicant sachet.)

Every so often someone will appear on the Belfast Forum announcing that the book is about to be republished, and they're taking advance orders, or that they're going to read the book chapter by chapter on their YouTube channel, but so far nothing has transpired.

Some copies are available through public and private libraries in Northern Ireland, but are classed as heritage/reference and so can't be borrowed, just read in situ. One reader took that route, though obviously this becomes rather more challenging if you live outside the area.

The heritage copy of Number 91 held by the Linenhall Library in Belfast (Ireland's oldest private members' library, though open to the public to come in browse) is by now basically just a load of loose pages in an envelope - though interestingly, it is a presentation copy to the library, signed by John Skillen.

There's supposedly a way to read it via the OpenLibrary project, but I'm still somewhat confused as to whether it is or isn't available - the title is listed, but classified as 'not in library'. Possibly someone more familiar with OpenLibrary may be able to find out more.

It seems the surviving family members would prefer the whole episode to be forgotten about; which, of course, tends to pique the interest even more.

John Skillen clearly felt strongly enough about what happened to him and his family to go to the trouble of publishing a book on the matter, so clearly - at one point - he was keen for his experiences, as he perceived them, to be widely known and understood.

I think what interests me most is not just what is alleged to have happened - which has comparators to very well-known cases like the Enfield Poltergeist and the Black Monk of Pontefract - but why it remains very obscure in paranormal circles, yet still has enormous potency and strength of feeling within the local community, even thirty-odd years later.
I can see one problem in researching this case now - the name Woman in Black! You can guarantee 99% of the hits on Google will be the film / play / tv show / book!
 

Quercus

Devoted Cultist
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
104
Reaction score
660
Points
93
Location
Back of beyond
Could some of the obscurity be to do with the times during which this was happening? Things weren't happy in Belfast in 1989 and events in that direction may have overshadowed paranormal events to some degree, and prevented research into the occurances.
It's quite possible - though there have been numerous books on Irish Ghosts published in the last twenty-odd years, both by local authors as well as by fairly big-hitters like Peter Underwood, and they've continued to overlook the Beechmount case.

Given that there was media interest and some limited SPR involvement at the time, I think I'm just a little surprised that there's been no reappraisal, when other polt cases like Sauchie and South Shields are fairly well known.

Something makes me wonder whether it was debunked not long after, and I just haven't found that out!
 

Who me

Ephemeral Spectre
Joined
Nov 2, 2019
Messages
384
Reaction score
1,121
Points
134
Nice one quercus it’s the first time I’ve heard of this event.Well done
 

Soul_Doubt

Junior Acolyte
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
50
Reaction score
41
Points
24
I've been trying to research a case on and off for a few years now - known locally as The Beechmount Poltergeist, sometimes also referred to as The Woman In Black.
Hey Quercus, I got forwarded a PDF copy of this book a year or two back after hearing rumours about it for many years before that.

I think a local publisher is missing a trick by not re-publishing it, I think it would do phenomenally well. Even people who aren't normally into paranormal stuff seem fascinated by it.

I must say I was disappointed after reading it... it seemed *extremely* implausible to me. Especially the physical attacks. Though having said that, I used to work with a guy who claimed to know the family and swore it was true.

I did a bit of my own research after reading to see if I could get any more details (solely on Google) but couldn't find anything other than that Belfast Forum thread.
 

Quercus

Devoted Cultist
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
104
Reaction score
660
Points
93
Location
Back of beyond
Hey Quercus, I got forwarded a PDF copy of this book a year or two back after hearing rumours about it for many years before that.

I think a local publisher is missing a trick by not re-publishing it, I think it would do phenomenally well. Even people who aren't normally into paranormal stuff seem fascinated by it.

I must say I was disappointed after reading it... it seemed *extremely* implausible to me. Especially the physical attacks. Though having said that, I used to work with a guy who claimed to know the family and swore it was true.

I did a bit of my own research after reading to see if I could get any more details (solely on Google) but couldn't find anything other than that Belfast Forum thread.
Yeah, it seems that the surviving family members want nothing whatsoever to do with the book, and have repeatedly refused permission to republish - despite a ready market for it. Apparently it's nothing to do with the money, they just don't want their own kids to be subjected to the stigma they faced while growing up, and are still trying to move on from what occurred in their home thirty-odd years ago.

They've also come down hard on those circulating PDFs, getting a bit legalistic at times, again in an effort to stop the story becoming more widely known again. But it's a tough thing to keep a lid on, especially when there are literally hundreds of people mentioned in the book, many of them named, who heard, saw and felt the entity in No.91. And still support the veracity of the published account, even though they stand to gain nothing from it now.

Aside from the Belfast Forum threads about the case, I also found some interesting snippets from a general-topic Facebook page for Beechmount residents, where references to 'the ghostie house' cropped up a few times.

Interestingly, some of the people commenting on Facebook identified themselves as related to neighbours of the Skillens, who became embroiled in the disturbances - and their surnames do cross-reference with those mentioned in the book. Some also vouch for the truthfulness of the account as written down by John Skillen. A lot of folk from the area were drawn in to the case, so it's maybe no surprise there's a strong folk memory still.

I'm still trying to draw together some sort of synopsis of the whole case, because it is way beyond the realm of anything else I've ever heard happening. I probably need to try the BBC again, to see if they still have the radio interview with John Skillen held in their archives. And the SPR archive in Cambridge, to see if they hold Sheila St Clair's notes from her investigation at Beechmount. Also the Newspaper Library off Royal Avenue, to see what the original press reports said - the reporters were apparently sceptical, and I'd be interested to know what their grounds were for dismissing it.

It's a fascinating case; outlandish and in many ways implausible, since it deviates so radically in its detail from more conventional tales of hauntings and poltergeists. I know that most paranormal investigators will say that if a supposed haunting contains entirely unique elements compared to similar reported cases, then that probably means it's a fabrication (e.g. the Lutz family's somewhat lurid account of their supposed experiences, which became The Amityville Horror). I agree with you that it doesn't seem to ring true, and yet... something happened in that house. It bugs me that I still don't know what.

[Edited for typo]
 
Last edited:

Spookdaddy

Cuckoo
Joined
May 24, 2006
Messages
7,010
Reaction score
9,023
Points
294
Location
Midwich
The dramatic circumstances of the alleged 1989 haunting of house on Beechmount Grove, West Belfast, have recently been discussed on the Obscure Cases, thread.

However, as Quercus suggested over there, the case really deserves a thread of its own - and I’ve been inspired to start the ball rolling because, completely by coincidence, I have just stumbled across a podcast covering the case in the last few hours. (In fact, at the time of writing episode two appears to be barely a day old ).

Most importantly, both episodes are based on very close reference to, and direct quotation from, the infuriatingly hard to get book on the subject, Number 91: A Belfast Ghost Story, by John Skillen.

I freely admit that I really have no idea what to make of the case – but it’s most definitely interesting.

I’m going to ask the nice mods if they might be able to fillet out the relevant posts from the previously mentioned thread and put them here.

Anyway, I haven’t listened to the whole thing yet – but here are two satisfyingly chunky episodes on the subject from the Weekly Creep podcast, which was completely unknown to me until a few hours ago. (Trigger warning for earthy language - if that sort of thing bothers you):





Okay, so not only that, but Quercus also mentioned on the previously mentioned thread:

…Every so often someone will appear on the Belfast Forum announcing that the book is about to be republished, and they're taking advance orders, or that they're going to read the book chapter by chapter on their YouTube channel, but so far nothing has transpired.
I wonder if this is that guy. He has put up an awful lot of relevant stuff - text as well as background. In fact, although I’ve only dipped into his channel and can’t say for sure, it seems the whole text of the book might be included.

First instalment:


Complete playlist for the book, here.

Edit: Currently only 11 of the 17 chapters covered. But apparently he has plans to finish.
 
Last edited:

Quercus

Devoted Cultist
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
104
Reaction score
660
Points
93
Location
Back of beyond
Hey, thanks for posting the podcast link here - most helpful! And also to @EnolaGaia for moving this to its own thread (making it all nice and neat).

I received a notification only yesterday from Belfast Forum flagging a new post about No. 91, and I came here with the intention of advising those with an interest:

Screenshot_20210501-234845~2.png

http://www.belfastforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,73633.0.html

I haven't listened to the podcast myself yet, but that's tomorrow morning's listening decided...

Also thanks to @Spookdaddy for finding the YouTube reading links - this was also mentioned on Belfast Forum last summer, but no more was ever mentioned about it and I assumed it had foundered as a project. Well, apparently not!

Screenshot_20210501-235613~2.png

http://www.belfastforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,23056.405.html

I dont know whether the "copyright issues" were addressed and the project is fully legit, but hopefully so - since it's such a hassle to find an original copy of the account, and because it's such a singular tale that deserves to be told.

In all honesty, I'm a teeny weeny bit downcast as I've been chipping away at this story for a right few years now, and I suppose I had started to feel a bit proprietorial as if it were 'my' story, in a way... so it comes as a minor shock to find that I've been pipped to the post by the podcasters, so to speak.

I'd hoped to find Sheila St Clair's original casenotes in the Cambridge archive, to see if they gave the non-pseudonymised names of the other researchers involved to open up further lines of enquiry, and I'd hoped to track down contemporary news and radio articles to see if they squared with the claims made in the book.

BUT, all things considered, it's not my story and I've no more claim to it than anyone else. And if there's other people out there who have done further research from different angles, then that's a good thing... I really need to stop feeling so precious about it all.

Will have a listen to the podcast in the morning!
 

Spookdaddy

Cuckoo
Joined
May 24, 2006
Messages
7,010
Reaction score
9,023
Points
294
Location
Midwich
...BUT, all things considered, it's not my story and I've no more claim to it than anyone else. And if there's other people out there who have done further research from different angles, then that's a good thing... I really need to stop feeling so precious about it all...
Don't be so downcast, Quercus.

I don't think you have to beat yourself up in regard to feeling a bit of proprietorial about the case - I suspect that is a very common thing, especially with the more obscure ones, and probably inevitable, when you've rolled up your shirtsleeves and put your shoulder to something that hasn't moved for years.

Secondly, although the podcast and links I referenced are very interesting for those of us who cannot get hold of the book, and provide a fair bit of background and context, they really don't move the story along in any way from the position it was in your first post on the subject.

...I'd hoped to find Sheila St Clair's original casenotes in the Cambridge archive, to see if they gave the non-pseudonymised names of the other researchers involved to open up further lines of enquiry, and I'd hoped to track down contemporary news and radio articles to see if they squared with the claims made in the book...
Still sounds like a very good plan to me.

And, if the whole thing does turn out to be more, or less, than it seems - well, my attitude to these things is that even if the real story is not the one being told, there's still a story. It's definitely got legs, and I look forward to future developments.
 
Last edited:

Quercus

Devoted Cultist
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
104
Reaction score
660
Points
93
Location
Back of beyond
Well, I had a listen to the Weekly Creep podcast episodes about Number 91 over the weekend (while I was laying drains, as it happens).

Weighing in at around three hours in total across two episodes, it's a hefty enough listen. But in fairness the duo behind the show - Adam and Dulce - do manage to summarise the book pretty well, reading out the more interesting paranormal sections verbatim, while glossing over the more everyday linking passages concerning the family's ever-evolving living arrangements. If you've a few hours to spare, it'll certainly give you a good understanding of what John Skillen's book is all about.

At the very end, Adam the co-host states that it's "probably the most interesting ghost story I've ever read", certainly in terms of the sheer amount of activity recounted. And I can see why that is - there is a lot in the book, and some of it pretty extreme.

But I still find it interesting that it's seen as a 'ghost story' (and indeed is subtitled as such on the cover), because I don't see it that way - it's certainly an account, but it's absolutely not a story in the sense of a narrative arc, as there's not much in the way of a resolution, or even a working theory about what's going on. Stuff just happens, and no-one knows why. John Skillen's as much in the dark as the reader is.

With cases such as Enfield or Pontefract, armchair investigators (such as myself) can at least speculate about what might have happened based on the available evidence or other hearsay (the poltergeist at Enfield was somehow related to a former resident of the property who had died there; the Black Monk at Pontefract was linked to a murder at a well over which the property was built), but the Beechmount case gives us nothing to go on, other than the tantalising possibility that the same figure had popped up in other properties on the estate before arriving at No.91.

As a story, its incompleteness is what makes it fascinating to some (like me) and frustrating to others (the many who have slammed the book on Belfast Forum as being 'rubbish' and 'boring').

It seems that someone forwarded the Weekly Creep showhosts one of the bootleg PDFs in circulation, and they took it from there.

Screenshot_20210502-202354~2.png

Screenshot_20210502-202420~2.png

Belfast Forum gets a mention, as it seems that this has become an unwitting focus for much of the lore and speculation surrounding No.91.

If I were being picky, I'd have to say that the show's tone kinda jarred a bit with me. Adam states that the show is meant to be lighthearted, but at times I felt the comments made came across as more than just flippant, and verging on quite unpleasant. Doing jokey voices is one thing; speculating that they were all drunk goes a bit further.

These were real people, and even if everything that was stated to occur didn't necessarily happen exactly the way it's recorded, the Skillens believed that it did - and their distress is palpable throughout the book, as well as their confusion and anger. I don't think it's fair to just turn it into a piss-take. Anyone can comment as they please on a book, but I'd sooner have heard a more serious discussion about the events outlined.

Which then brings us in to the other YouTube channel covering the same tale, 'Irish Technical Thinker's chapter-by-chapter telling of the story.

Now, I've only listened to the initial preamble and Chapter 1 so far, as this moves quite slowly - it's read line by line, with other discussion and explanation around it - as the narrator explicitly states, it's done this way to get around copyright law, as he's recording a critique of a text rather than just reading out the text itself.

Not only can you follow the PDF text on the screen, but the narrator also uses mapping to show roughly where No.91 once stood (very roughly - I'm fairly sure he's at the wrong end of a very long and winding street) and draws in other local folklore to contrast with the events of June 1989.

He does also have his own local knowledge to add to the proceedings, plus he personally knows someone who was there and witnessed some of the phenomena - so that's valuable. I hope to listen to a few more of these, and hopefully he'll finish the full book. Again, if you're interested in a long listen, you may wish to tune in.

As ever, in search of various nuggets about this case I always end up grubbing around the comments sections.

Which can sometimes pay dividends.
Screenshot_20210502-003744~3.png


I'm going to guess that Zoe Skillen's surname isn't a coincidence...
 
Last edited:
Top