• Forums Software Updates

    The forums will be undergoing updates on Sunday 10th November 2024.
    Little to no downtime is expected.
  • We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

The Brontes All Died Young From Drinking Graveyard Water & Human Waste

MrRING

Android Futureman
Joined
Aug 7, 2002
Messages
6,053
This story leaves a bad taste in my mouth, but it is a fascinating scenario nevertheless!

https://lithub.com/apparently-the-b...y-spent-their-lives-drinking-graveyard-water/



Apparently the Brontës all died so early because they spent their lives drinking graveyard water.

By Emily Temple


It is a well known and oft-romanticized fact that the Brontë sisters—and the Brontë brother, for that matter—all died young, one after the other, leaving moody, moor-y masterpieces in their wake. Officially, they all suffered from tuberculosis, or complications thereof, and unofficially, they all died of grief for one another, but as I learned this week, apparently there was a very real and disturbing factor that contributed to their lifelong illnesses and early deaths: they spent their lives drinking water contaminated by the local graveyard—and possibly the local privies, too.

An 1850 investigation by Benjamin Hershel Babbage—which was instigated by Patrick Brontë, the novelists’ father and the parish priest, shortly after the deaths of Emily (1848; she was 30), Branwell (1848; he was 31), and Anne (1849; she was 29)—showed that the small town of Haworth, where the Brontës lived, had much higher mortality rates than other nearby towns of similar size. 41.6% of Haworth’s inhabitants died before the age of 6; the average age of death was 25.8. (Charlotte would die in 1855 at the age of 38—of what would have been a treatable condition today; Patrick would outlive all of his children.)

Babbage, seeking to get to the bottom of these statistics, found, among other things, that there were not enough privies for the population, and those they had were filthy, not properly drained, and—bizarrely—much too public. “Two of the privies used, by a dozen families each, are in the public street,” he wrote, “not only within view of the houses, but exposed to the gaze of passers by, whilst a third, as though even such a situation were too private, is perched upon an eminence, commanding the whole length of the main street.” The cesspit beneath this privy would sometimes overflow into the street; a water tap was two yards away from its door.

Then there was the graveyard—which sat on a hill, right in front of the parsonage where the Brontës lived—which Babbage found to be overstuffed, badly laid out, and poorly oxygenated, so much so that the decomposing material from the graves had filtered into the town’s water supply. The long-term exposure to harmful bacteria would have made the Brontës weaker, shorter, and more susceptible to other diseases.

Well . . . it’s still romantic in theory I suppose—a family of young, brilliant novelists dies from drinking graveyard water, has anything been more Gothic—but in practice, I will spend today being grateful for modern plumbing.
 
This story leaves a bad taste in my mouth, but it is a fascinating scenario nevertheless!

https://lithub.com/apparently-the-b...y-spent-their-lives-drinking-graveyard-water/


Depends where their well was... As that house is at the higher point, IIRC? Probably the only people in Haworth not affected! Although that almost contemporary investigation into the health of locals was very much needed - they planted trees in the graveyard after its findings. Rev Bronte was apparently pissed off that the locals used gravestones to hang out/dry their washing, too.

But yes, lots of woollen industry activity going on up there. Textile workers often stricken by pandemics, or localised outbreaks of various things - pay was so low, work conditions so tough, etc. Think the way cholera worked was finally figured out in the 1850s? Too late for the Bronte siblings. And the TB they almost certainly died of, would not be water-borne.
 
Although it does ignore the fact that Patrick, presumably drinking the same water as everyone else, outlived them all.

He was an adult when he came there (so far as I know); part of the linked story above talks about the younger Brontes growing up under those difficult conditions and that made them weaker to begin with... I believe the recentish problems in the Flint/Detroit "lead in water" crisis has had more of an effect on the kids who were drinking the contaminated water over the adults. Certainly that is how I take this report:
https://www.nrdc.org/stories/flint-water-crisis-everything-you-need-know
A story of environmental injustice and bad decision making, the water crisis in Flint, Michigan, began in 2014, when the city switched its drinking water supply from Detroit’s system to the Flint River in a cost-saving move. Inadequate treatment and testing of the water resulted in a series of major water quality and health issues for Flint residents—issues that were chronically ignored, overlooked, and discounted by government officials even as complaints mounted that the foul-smelling, discolored, and off-tasting water piped into Flint homes for 18 months was causing skin rashes, hair loss, and itchy skin. The Michigan Civil Rights Commission, a state-established body, concluded that the poor governmental response to the Flint crisis was a “result of systemic racism.”

Later studies would reveal that the contaminated water was also contributing to a doubling—and in some cases, tripling—of the incidence of elevated blood lead levels in the city’s children, imperiling the health of its youngest generation.
 
He was an adult when he came there (so far as I know); part of the linked story above talks about the younger Brontes growing up under those difficult conditions and that made them weaker to begin with... I believe the recentish problems in the Flint/Detroit "lead in water" crisis has had more of an effect on the kids who were drinking the contaminated water over the adults. Certainly that is how I take this report:
https://www.nrdc.org/stories/flint-water-crisis-everything-you-need-know
Not sure if the well or their source of drinking water, was in their garden or they were using a village pump or what, but I just went to look at images and my memory did serve correct - the house is above the graveyard. I'll ask when I'm next there researching (am lucky enough to have gone behind the scenes quite a few times, and done research in a room the public don't get access to, which was Patrick's study at some point, I think?)

Also, none of them died of any water borne disease - Emily, Anne and Branwell of TB; Charlotte of excessive pregnancy sickness (no doubt already had TB as she'd shared rooms with her sisters). I'll ask when next there, where their water source was, just outta interest. They were all born in another place, Thornton although Anne only a baby when she came to Haworth.

You could argue that poor water made them weaker, but it's unlikely it would predispose you to TB and I'm not 100% sure the source of the drinking water for that house was anywhere in the run off from the graveyard, anyway. No doubt pretty well everyone else in the village was drinking that, though. Although most working class people drank beer/ale as it was safer.

Was in Scarbella on Friday - here's Anne's grave:
Screenshot 2022-05-04 at 14.18.33.png
 
Not sure if the well or their source of drinking water, was in their garden or they were using a village pump or what, but I just went to look at images and my memory did serve correct - the house is above the graveyard. I'll ask when I'm next there researching (am lucky enough to have gone behind the scenes quite a few times, and done research in a room the public don't get access to, which was Patrick's study at some point, I think?)

Also, none of them died of any water borne disease - Emily, Anne and Branwell of TB; Charlotte of excessive pregnancy sickness (no doubt already had TB as she'd shared rooms with her sisters). I'll ask when next there, where their water source was, just outta interest. They were all born in another place, Thornton although Anne only a baby when she came to Haworth.

You could argue that poor water made them weaker, but it's unlikely it would predispose you to TB and I'm not 100% sure the source of the drinking water for that house was anywhere in the run off from the graveyard, anyway. No doubt pretty well everyone else in the village was drinking that, though. Although most working class people drank beer/ale as it was safer.

Was in Scarbella on Friday - here's Anne's grave:
View attachment 55005
I like to visit Anne's grave when I'm up that end of Scabby.

But yes, the Haworth parsonage is north (and uphill) of the graveyard, but it depends where their water pumped from. And I take the point that Patrick was already an adult when he came to Haworth, but all the girls and Branwell were born elsewhere (and Branwell basically drank himself to death rather than dying of the water). It could have weakened them, but I'd guess just living in the massively industrialised area with the resultant air pollution would have done just as much to kill them off. Haworth today is reasonably peaceful but it was all mills and textile workings when the Brontes were there.
 
It would be great to obtain more detailed information via autopsy, but I suspect this would be impossible now so long after their deaths. With the benefit of 20:20 hindsight, some causes of illness seem obvious to us, but to the father 170 years ago, it must have been overwhelming and confusing. Why should so many of his children die in a short span of time, while others' children lived?

Without more specific information about the Bronte deaths, I vaguely think that a single major cause, such as TB or pregnancy, was the final health challenge to someone already weakened by pre-existing conditions - as GITM pointed out. These pre-existing conditions were a result from multiple secondary, contributing causes: living in close proximity to people with TB, poor nutrition, lack of sunlight, constitutions weakened by ongoing exposure to infections transmitted from contaminated water or food, etc. As so many children died, perhaps there was a genetic weakness. Also, poverty, which even if they had enough to eat, could have been stressful if they had a social status to maintain as a cleric's family. Even if the TB was diagnosed, the Brontes could not have afforded to send the sick family members to Italy for months or a few years to recover in a warm, dry climate with nutritious food. All conjecture and speculation.

Now I can write a book: "The Mystery of the Brontes' Death: Solved!"

Years ago, I worked with a middle-aged, apparently healthy woman who was very sad and stressed as her husband had left her. She had never traveled outside of the US for any reason. The divorce was so stressful that she started developing physical symptoms such as a cough and feeling tired all the time. Many mornings before work started, she and I would get together for breakfast; she handed me bacon with her bare fingers; she would cry and sniffle, and I would hug her. Yep, she had multiple drug-resistant TB. Her infectious symptoms went on for months before she was tested for the highly unlikely TB. As I recall, over 50 people were contacted by the health authorities and firmly requested to get tested. Family, friends, work colleagues, church members.
 
One thing that might be interesting would be to compare the heights of the Brontes compared to the people in the surrounding village and then in England in general, to see if they were considerably shorter than others.

And... while searching for their heights, I came across this website that has found a photo that may (or may not) be of the Brontes:
https://brontesisters.co.uk/
This is a collodion photo with "The Bronte Sisters" written in French on the reverse, however this type of photograph on glass only existed from the early 1850s, after the death of Emily (1848) and Anne (1849).

The researcher's experience in photography spans three decades and includes printing thousands of photographs from glass negatives such as this. He believes that this is a copy of an earlier 1840s photo known as a daguerreotype. The photo is on a slight slant and has the appearance of having been cropped. This is how daguerreotypes were often copied, at an angle to avoid reflections and centred to avoid marks at the edges of the original photo.

Provenance.

The image is in a photographic archive in Scotland. As with most photos there is virtually no provenance and it can only be traced back to the previous owners in France. It is thought that they purchased it in the Paris area.

Photographs of the Bronte Sisters.

Charlotte Bronte first used the term daguerreotyped early in January 1848 which suggests that she had recently seen a photograph. This was within four weeks of the three sisters secretly becoming published authors; even their own father was unaware, despite the fact that they were all living under the same roof. There is no record of a photo being taken of the Bronte sisters but, given the history of other portraits, there may be very good reasons for this.
 
One thing that might be interesting would be to compare the heights of the Brontes compared to the people in the surrounding village and then in England in general, to see if they were considerably shorter than others.

And... while searching for their heights, I came across this website that has found a photo that may (or may not) be of the Brontes:
https://brontesisters.co.uk/
I have seen one of the sisters' dresses on display in the Parsonage, and iirc, it's absolutely tiny.
 
One thing that might be interesting would be to compare the heights of the Brontes compared to the people in the surrounding village and then in England in general, to see if they were considerably shorter than others.

And... while searching for their heights, I came across this website that has found a photo that may (or may not) be of the Brontes:
https://brontesisters.co.uk/
Great find! That website also mentioned height but said that they weren't small by the standards of the time. On this page.

https://brontesisters.co.uk/Charlotte-Bronte.html

Charlotte was about 4 feet 10 inches; Emily was considered tall at about 5 feet 6 inches; Anne's height is unknown. This was not unusual for the time.
 
One thing that might be interesting would be to compare the heights of the Brontes compared to the people in the surrounding village and then in England in general, to see if they were considerably shorter than others.

And... while searching for their heights, I came across this website that has found a photo that may (or may not) be of the Brontes:
https://brontesisters.co.uk/
They were all small, I think, although Charlotte described herself as "dumpy" in a letter to her friend.

Interestingly, the man who made Emily's coffin remarked it was the narrowest coffin he ever made for an adult - something like 16" wide. Which again points to the accuracy of the TB diagnosis - but also there's a possibility she may have been anorexic as she was known to have threatened to stop eating, to get her own way and food and controlling food, seems to have become part of her role in the household.
 
I was talking over this story with my younger brother who thought about the well in relation to the graveyard. Even if the graveyard is below the house, the way the water flowed underneath the surface could have still put graveyard matter into their water source depending on many factors. I'm not an expert, and neither is he, but I did find this swell US government website about groundwater and wells:
https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/gw_ruralhomeowner/
It looks like we'd need geologist and engineers looking at the property and the locale to best determine where the Bronte water source was and how the water movements in the earth around them influenced what was in that drinking water. The above link mentions this:
The most common water-quality problem in rural water supplies is bacterial contamination from septic-tank effluent. A recent nationwide survey by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Cornell University found that contamination of drinking water by septic effluent may be one of the foremost water-quality problems in the Nation.
And it has a keen little graph that makes it look like the important thing is how the water table works underneath the septic tank.
septic.png

This brings to mind frightening memories of visiting family who lived in trailers and who did indeed have septic tanks... which I totally played around with my toys!
 
We have a septic tank here (also in Yorkshire but not Bronteland). And we're almost sea level with a high water table. I aten't dead yet!

Have had a few incidents where our nightmare neighbours blocked the pipes out to the tank (because they're morons) and behind the house was very, er, interesting for a few days - think it's happened twice with them and once when a previous (nice) neighbour accidentally fractured a pipe.
 
New film coming out about Emily Bronte really gives a sinister look to the landscape:

It's been out for a couple of months, my review.

Emily: An imagined life of Emily Bronte, setting out events which might have inspired her to write Wuthering Heights. Emily (Emma Mackey) has a torrid affair with her father's young curate, William Weightman (Oliver Jackson-Cohen) she is also led astray by her brother Branwell (Fionn Whitehead) who introduces her to alcohol and opium. Emily suffered from social anxiety so these drugs may have been a crutch for her, Mackey puts in a powerful performance, ranging from gloom and downcast eyes to ecstasy and then determination as Emily seeks fulfilment in literary endeavours. She wanders the moors like Cathy seeking Heathcliffe. Her sister Charlotte (Alexandra Dowling) always seems at odds with Emily, yet is also caring when Emily breaks down at school, she also vies Weightman's attentions and seems to be inspired (out of jealousy) at Emily's achievements to write Jane Eyre, Adrian Dunbar is the Patriarch of the Bronte household and channels Supt Hastings rather than DI Ridley with his fearsome sermons from the pulpit, fortunately he doesn't sing. The gray dark skies (the rain puts Angela's Ashes to shame) and starkly beautiful Yorkshire moors and heaths are also stars in this narrative. A sombre scene is captured during a game of charades when Emily dons a mask and transforms the amusements into a seance. A wonderful tale brought to life by Frances O'Connor who Wrote and Directed the film. 8.5/10.
 
Ive never understood the fascination with the Brontes.
I love Jane Eyre, and find Wuthering Heights a little over-wrought but readable. The rest I'm not so bothered with. I think we aren't 'fascinated' by the Brontes as such, it's more the kind of interest that is always shown in artistic endeavours of previous times. People want to know about their inspirations and their background as it might relate to their creations - in the same way as people are fascinated with Byron and Coleridge and painters like Rosetti.

Because there are a fair amount of contemporary writings to draw from, people love to hypothesize about their lives and 'where they got their ideas from'.
 
I love Jane Eyre, and find Wuthering Heights a little over-wrought but readable. The rest I'm not so bothered with. I think we aren't 'fascinated' by the Brontes as such, it's more the kind of interest that is always shown in artistic endeavours of previous times.
Could it be down to (I'm going to get in trouble here) an American/Japanese et al fascination with them perhaps, that makes it seem that they're more talked about than they really are?
 
Could it be down to (I'm going to get in trouble here) an American/Japanese et al fascination with them perhaps, that makes it seem that they're more talked about than they really are?
Well in literary circles they are talked about a great deal. Down at the local Wetherspoons, probably not as much.

Maybe it depends on who you are listening to!
 
At least in Wetherspoons, no matter how poor the beer is, they won't get typhoid.
That's where people went wrong in the past: drinking the water. John Snow had it sussed.
Good old John. Pete Doherty not so much.
 
I do love all this sort of thing. Water tables and hygiene and epidemics. Wonderful stuff. :cool:

Water provision and sewage removal have always been problematic. You need your clean water and your sewage to be kept well apart.
These days we don't realise what a tall order all this is when we're grumbling about the water bill.

My home town was built round one heavy industry from the 1830s onwards. Fresh water provision was good from the start, apparently via a series of underground tanks scattered around the area. Now and then builders will find one and work will be held up until it is dealt with.

By contrast, the next town was founded by the Romans and until relatively modern times had poor water provision. Disposal of waste was even less hygienic. That's how you get epidemics like typhoid.
There were two outbreaks there around the time my town was being built, less than 10 miles away, and to their credit the founding fathers were determined to keep it out of their shiny new Company houses and factories.

Anyway... my point was that without public works such as the Roman aqueducts, everything comes and leaves via the water table. It's not necessarily safer to live above the level of (say) a graveyard or public cesspit.

This is still a problem in rural parts of the USA, where sewage disposal is so inefficient that intestinal worms are endemic in some areas. It's horrific.
Fascinating though.
 
Back
Top