your trying to make the facts I wrote fit into some list of events that fit your ideas.
Facts
He had apparently taken 29 tablets with water, there was blood on the bottle but not on the blister pack in his pocket ? if he took them before he arrived at the tree, how come there was no evidence of toxicology to show he had taken 29 ? it only showed a small amount, He also had a bad thing about swallowing tablets we know that, he didnt take headache tablets, they were his wifes.
If he was stumbling around banging his head confused etc, blood would have been every where ? or did he stumble about and then regain composure to go through the watch removal etc and have a drink of water afterwards.
He was first seen propped up against the tree then, suddenly 10 minutes later lying flat down ?
Facts are
He didnt have enough tablets in his system to kill him (hutton report)
He didnt die from bleeding to death from a cut to his Ulnar artery ( plenty of proffesionals say this )
He didnt have any evidence of a heart attack ( Hutton report )
once again
why were his fingerprints not on the pruning knife ?
No fingerprints were found on the knife Dr Kelly is alleged to have used, it later emerged, and he was not wearing gloves when his body was discovered
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/poli ... -1.1048237
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/arti ... e-knife.do
how did the knife end up with no fingerprints ?
if the contents of his stomach didnt contain enough pain killers ? where did they go ?
Why was his dentist broken into and his dental records removed ? why no fingerprints on the file when it appeared back ?
who was the mysterious third policemand with Coe and Sheilds who was seen by 4 people.
2 A. He was at the base of the tree with almost his head and
3 his shoulders just slumped back against the tree.
4 Q. And what about his legs and arms? Where were they?
5 A. His legs were straight in front of him. His right arm
6 was to the side of him. His left arm had a lot of blood
7 on it
and was bent back in a funny position.
9 A. We walked back towards the car. On the way to the car
10
we met three police officers and Paul took them back to
11 show them where the body was, and I went back to the
12 car.
13 Q. Did you meet the police officers in the woods or after
14 you got out of the woods?
15 A. No, on the track, just between the woods and the car.
Yes. As we were going down the path we met
three police
20 officers coming the other way that
were from CID. We
21 identified ourselves to them. They were not actually
22 aware that (a) the body had been found or we were out
23 searching this area.
They I think had just come out on
24 their own initiative to look at the area. I informed
25 them we had found the body and they asked me to take
13 Q. Were the paramedics with you at the time?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. The other three officers?
16 A. They remained down on the path.
17 Q. So it is you, PC Franklin and two paramedics, then the
18 other three officers you have met; is that right?
19 A. Yes.
Thre detectives
only one named sheilds
only one questioned Coe
who was the other detective ? detectives searching ? in a pack
A. His jeans -- he was wearing jeans, they were pulled up
8 slightly, exposing the lower half of his leg or his
9 ankle. It looked as if he had slid down and his
10 trousers had ridden up
dragged down a little into a lying position ? head and shoulders no longer propped up why ?
10 Q. I should have asked you this a moment ago, but while you
11 were searching in the woods did you find anything at all
12 which indicated that any other people had been there?
13 A. No, nothing. Normally when we search wooded areas there
14 is a fair amount of detritus, crisp packets, bottles,
15 cans, cigarette ends.
This area itself was remarkable
16 for its complete lack of human interference.
had it cleaned ?
[/quote]