Sharon Hill
Complicated biological machine
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2014
- Messages
- 1,858
- Location
- Pennsylvania, USA
I'd agree but architecture and landscape has great significance. As was mentioned, some places feel haunted, newer places usually don't. Many sources on this: see Wiseman, French, etc.My initial thought is that there probably is a difference, and it concerns history and cues thereof.
Ghosts (in our western cultural context(s)) are usually described in terms of spirits left over from past lives. History is the summary narrative of all past lives. If remanent spirits exist, one might well expect them to be found wherever their past lives had occurred. There have been a lot more past lives in (e.g.) the UK than in the desert wastes of the Arabian Peninsula. That's the history angle in a nutshell. This angle presumes there are remanent spirits (or whatever they may be).
The cues angle concerns surviving items or environments that reflect or insinuate earlier human living (i.e., the settings for past lives). Ancient ruins, pathways, etc., serve as cues to recall the times during which past lives were lived, and such recollections easily turn to whether any of those past lives are still hanging around. This angle has more to do with the observer and influencing him / her to be more sensitive to remanent spirits in - or to more readily attribute remanent spirit status to - whatever they might experience in a given locale.
There's been quite a bit of work done on how paranormal tourism (overlapping with history tourism or dark tourism) has grown into a big draw. Here is a table of the top 10 haunted cities in the US that I compiled using online reviews:
Each town has its own "flavor" and feel to structure the haunted tales.
Published as “Paranormal Tourism: Market Study of a Novel and Interactive Approach to Space Activation and Monetization” (with J. Houran, E.D. Haynes, & U. Bielski) Cornell Hospitality Quarterly March 2020.