Well heck, Old Rover, I'd like to see them. Draw my own conclusions. I was the Science Editor for a daily newspaper back in my youth and you'd laugh yourself silly over some of the photos I received over the years. It became very obvious to me that most (I did not say "all" )so called rational human beings can be so easily fooled by the most mundane objects. And to top that off, even when you showed some of these people where they were mistaken they would then accuse you of "covering up the truth". I rarely exposed the "truth" in print but would generally answer these inquirys by mail. So I have seen my share of fabricated and misleading pictures. Once in a while you'd get a "good one". Those generally generated considerable news coverage. But there is nothing like a wild story to spark readers interest. Some of these farfetched, tall tales, only grew as you attempted to put them down logically. In our area we had the Dernberger fiasco. The story was so sensationalized that it spread nationally, maybe internationally, I'm not certain. That tale was so bizarre and totally off the wall that you would think any normal intelligent person would know it was false. But that was not the way of it. Luckily the paper I worked for took my advice and steered clear of it. Our competition latched on to the tale and made front page off and on for a few weeks. I'm sure it sold papers. But newpapers are suppose to print facts not juvenile day dreams. At least that was true 50 years ago. Anyway at the end the other newspaper ended up with egg on their face. Another story that came our way was the famous "Mothman" story. I'm sure you've heard that one. Even when the truth is known, no one wants to believe it. Not exciting enough.