Ronnie Jersey
Justified & Ancient
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
- Messages
- 3,038
I have to read up on the Corona crash, around the same time as Roswell.
Is there a thread on that one?
Is there a thread on that one?
I don't know why you think this hoax was particularly expensive. Indeed, it was intended to be a money-spinner for the two men who promoted it, Silas M. Newton and Leo A. Gebauer. They were eventually convicted of fraud in 1953.If the Aztec crash is a hoax, it is a very expensive and intricate hoax. What would the purpose of hoaxing in that area be?
I have to read up on the Corona crash, around the same time as Roswell.
Is there a thread on that one?
Maybe you could go to Aztec and see the site. It is expensive as there is a monument, The rancher had to put up an extra fence to keep visitors from wandering around the rest of his ranch. As far as I know the only money that has been made is the 11 years the Friends of the Library held their symposium, which included a lot of other incidents and books. It took 11 years for them to earn enough money to build their new libraray. Other than that the only people who earned any money on that stroy are Scully and that guy from Colorado that wrote a book claiming people he interviewed said ... that they did not say in the 90's. So, how was it a money spinner?As I noted a few posts earlier, there were 42 crashes in 1947. Not to mention the Aztec 'crash' which supposedly happened in 1948.
I don't know why you think this hoax was particularly expensive. Indeed, it was intended to be a money-spinner for the two men who promoted it, Silas M. Newton and Leo A. Gebauer. They were eventually convicted of fraud in 1953.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztec,_New_Mexico_UFO_hoax
... Other than that the only people who earned any money on that stroy are Scully and that guy from Colorado that wrote a book claiming people he interviewed said ... that they did not say in the 90's. So, how was it a money spinner?
SOURCE / FULL STORY: https://history.denverlibrary.org/news/flying-saucers-and-fraud-silas-m-newton-storyEach doodlebug supposedly cost around $800,000 to produce, making Flader’s $50,000 buy-in seem very modest by comparison. In exchange for this initial investment, Flader was granted partnership in GeBauer’s Colorado Geophysics & Development company, as well as the promise of long-term profits. Unsurprisingly, the device failed to perform as advertised, and the subsequent long-term payoff never materialized. Newton’s role as petroleum promoter wasn’t limited to Flader, as Dr. Alfred D. Kleyhauer, a Denver optometrist, also lost $15,000 to the scheme.
Lots of poetic license there, obviously the auther never went to Aztec. There is no bike trail, the dirt road going near to the site is a well road, traveled dailly by oil well workers visiting the wells, and that road existed in 1948 as well. There were improvements to that road to get heavy equipment to the site, the concrete footings still exist.As Eburacum said - it was intended to be a money-spinner.
Newton and Gebauer were peddling "doodlebugs" - devices that supposedly detected underground deposits of (e.g.) oil and gold. Their sales gimmick was claiming their doodlebugs were derived from alien technology obtained from a crashed flying saucer.
They managed to reel in Denver industrialist Herman Flader, who initially invested several tens of thousands of dollars and would eventually claim to have been taken for over a quarter of a million dollars. Flader wasn't the only one ...
SOURCE / FULL STORY: https://history.denverlibrary.org/news/flying-saucers-and-fraud-silas-m-newton-story
See Also:
Mysterious New Mexico: Miracles, Magic, and Monsters in the Land of Enchantment
By Benjamin Radford
https://books.google.com/books?id=40a4AwAAQBAJ&pg=PT68#v=onepage&q&f=false
No, he was in the Army. The Air Force did not exist yet. But your point is valid, it makes no sense that he would make the story up.I know you have discussed all this, but in the end, Jesse Marcel was a lieutenant colonel in the United States Air Force -
what possible reason could he have for lying after 30 years about Roswell.
And his son, Jesse Marcel Jr, who actually saw and handled some of the debris, I don't understand what his motivation could be for lying either.
This is what makes me think they are experimental earth vehicles. There are som many disparate reports there is no way to say they are all one thing.Maybe that is the problem in that UFOs are designed for space travel and not for our atmosphere.
I can see a lighting bolt causing a disruption in the magnetic field around the UFO.
A typical lighting bolt is 300 million volts and 30,000 Amps.
UFO witnesses describe UFOs in our atmosphere like a falling leaf back and forth not steady.
Ok. I can get with that program. What I have seen and experienced makes more sense from that perspective. It seems that people who believe the crashed ships can only be aliens from outer space and they have traveled through space probably are only reading books and have not had any of their own experiences. But even so, the universe is electrical so ligtning and electrical issues would be the first hazard that would have to be overcome no matter how one travels from one solar system to another.JahaRa,
I am actually a non conformist in that I am 100% sure we are dealing with an another dimension.
We are not looking at space travel at all.
Maybe that is the problem in that UFOs are designed for space travel and not for our atmosphere.
This sounds surprisingly relevant to our modern era; similar frauds have been perpetuated in recent years, although without the alien connection.Newton and Gebauer were peddling "doodlebugs" - devices that supposedly detected underground deposits of (e.g.) oil and gold. Their sales gimmick was claiming their doodlebugs were derived from alien technology obtained from a crashed flying saucer.
I am perfectly prepared to accept everything Marcel Sr said about Roswell. In particular he maintained that the debris in the photos was the actual debris found at the ranch. Since the debris in the photos consists of debris from a crashed balloon train, then we must conclude that the crash was nothing more than a balloon - there is no other logical conclusion.Jesse Marcel was a lieutenant colonel in the United States Air Force -
what possible reason could he have for lying after 30 years about Roswell.
I know you have discussed all this, but in the end, Jesse Marcel was a lieutenant colonel in the United States Air Force -
what possible reason could he have for lying after 30 years about Roswell. ...
And Marcel also claimed that 'it was not of this earth' ...
Jesse Marcel couldn't tell the truth at the time, because he was ordered not to.There's a lie right there - no matter which way you interpret it.
Was he lying about the material being "not of this earth" because - as an intelligence officer managing the professed semantics of the situation - he was inclined (or instructed) to link the debris Brazel discovered to the UFO flap in progress at the time?
OR
Was he lying in not revealing he was either omniscient or an experienced space traveler himself - the only ways he could have authoritatively claimed the materials were "not of this earth"?
One question about Roswell, I am asking this as a genuine question and not to disparage anyone's beliefs.
... so where was/was there a similar crew compartment at Roswell...?
Thanks for the concise answerIf by "Roswell" you mean the Brazel / Marcel debris (etc.) storyline from July 1947 the answer is a firm "No."
The first claims of alien bodies didn't emerge (in the New Mexico context of the time) until the Newton / Gebauer / Aztec hoax in 1948. The Aztec story's elements were patched onto the basic Roswell story in the 1950s to yield a narrative that appeared here and there in UFO / paranormal literature at the time.
There was a resurgence of claims about a New Mexico crash with alien bodies when the Barney Barnett story (Plains of San Agustin) surfaced 3 decades later. As happened with the Aztec story in the 1950s, the Barnett story (and / or its derivative variants) was blended into the basic Roswell story to produce multiple "two sites" theories alleging the final crash site was (e.g.) somewhere in the Corona area.
That is a good question. I think we don't have all the information or any of the right information. Someone does but this was after the 1945 crash when the army was surprised and did not do anything to cover anything up until the whole thing had been cleaned up, and it was very close to the Trinity site a few weeks after the last test and before the drop on Japan. And that was visiting all the residents in the area and telling them to be quiet about it or they would be put in prison.One question about Roswell, I am asking this as a genuine question and not to disparage anyone's beliefs.
I understand the debris field was spread over a considerable area and that no large 'chunks' of the flying object were discovered, so why were the supposed bodies allegedly intact and not also spread over the ranch in little pieces...? For a spacecraft to disintegrate to such an extent is evidence of huge destructive forces at work, otherwise they would have found intact seats, control panels, engine parts etc and not just some flimsy beams with hieroglyphics and some torn fabric. For example, with the tragic Challenger crash the crew compartment was found with the badly dismembered bodies inside but there was no mistaking it was a part of a space shuttle, so where was/was there a similar crew compartment at Roswell...?