catseye
Captain of motley gang of rag zealots
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 12,146
- Location
- York
One of us...one of us...Please don't tell me that you've gone over to the dark side domain of Captain Catseye and her crew, Si...![]()
One of us...one of us...Please don't tell me that you've gone over to the dark side domain of Captain Catseye and her crew, Si...![]()
Huh? Bacon? I see egg and cress. This just gets weirder and weirder.Looks like Queen Elizabeth either playing a mouth organ or eating a bacon sandwich.
View attachment 86387
Bearing in mind it was January & probably bit nippy I think it more likely she’d fancy.a hot bacon sandwich rather than cold egg & cress. I think that’s a thermos of hot tea hanging at her side as well.Huh? Bacon? I see egg and cress. This just gets weirder and weirder.
I see a muff.Bearing in mind it was January & probably bit nippy I think it more likely she’d fancy.a hot bacon sandwich rather than cold egg & cress. I think that’s a thermos of hot tea hanging at her side as well.
DON'T LOOK....it's one of the escaped Weeping Angels hiding from the Doctor.Looks like Queen Elizabeth either playing a mouth organ or eating a bacon sandwich.
View attachment 86387
It's when you're not looking at them that you're in danger. If you look away they get you and you vanish in the blink ofDON'T LOOK....it's one of the escaped Weeping Angels hiding from the Doctor.
Yes yes I remember I remember...... been a long time for my Doctor Who happinessIt's when you're not looking at them that you're in danger. If you look away they get you and you vanish in the blink of
Whatever it is she's apparently got her eyes shut, so she's taking a chance...Huh? Bacon? I see egg and cress. This just gets weirder and weirder.
Because it's not a dress, it's a rag blowing around on a bush.Just been looking, again, at the photo in post #543. The clothing seems to me to be 17th-century and therefore I'd expect to see a dress that is wider in appearance than the wearer's body...but why is it only 'flared' on one side (the left-hand side, as we look at the photo)?
EDIT: Or maybe I'm mistaken, and the 'flaring' is equal on both sides.
Just been looking, again, at the photo in post #543. The clothing seems to me to be 17th-century and therefore I'd expect to see a dress that is wider in appearance than the wearer's body...but why is it only 'flared' on one side (the left-hand side, as we look at the photo)?
EDIT: Or maybe I'm mistaken, and the 'flaring' is equal on both sides.
I'm afraid you're looking in the wrong county - I believe this photo was taken in Hampshire in the New Forest.Having consulted Google, it appears that there are lots of ghosts in Bedfordshire but hardly any of the accounts/stories/legends fit the profile of the Eyeworth figure.
I'm afraid you're looking in the wrong county - I believe this photo was taken in Hampshire in the New Forest.
There was some confusion early on in the thread that was later cleared up.Ah, but the ghost might've had a bus pass. I mean, trust me to get the very basics wrong.
*cries a lot*
The comment that the photo was handed over to a photographer who "had the expertise" to exploit the photo for monetary gain tells me that it is a manipulated photo.I thought the photograph was interesting enough to take it to the local paper and they printed a story with the pictures which lead to an approach from an independent photographer who asked if he could buy the negatives from us. I suggested that we let him exploit the photographs, as he had the expertise, and we go 50%/ 50% on anything he made out of the story. He agreed to this and over the course of the next year a double page spread appeared in the Sunday Mirror, the National Examiner in the States ran a big story on it and a glossy Japanese magazine also picked it up – and that is but a few. I was sure we were going to enhance hunt funds by thousands of pounds and be able to do some much needed repairs to our property- if not a total rebuild! Alas, when I tried to get some of our 50%, the man had turned to straw – or maybe to a ghost!!”
https://weird-wiltshire.co.uk/2021/11/20/the-mysterious-stone-ghost-girl-of-eyeworth
It would be good to find this as it will help pin down when and where the enlarged and potentially enhanced third image originated
Pretty much anything in a long dress would look similar. Fabric hanging down falls along similar lines whatever it is.I knew our favourite Stone Girl reminded me of something. I have only just realised what it was... the Nemesis living statue (which was actually a weapon of mass destruction) which featured in the 1988 Doctor Who serial "Silver Nemesis", as pictured below....
View attachment 86408
Yeah, but she was all like glow-y. No sandwich though.<ticks @brownmane 's name off on the register>
Pretty much anything in a long dress would look similar. Fabric hanging down falls along similar lines whatever it is.
Perhaps the ground was wet or muddy, and so someone placed the planks there to avoid messing up their shoes or clothing.If those are planks of wood, be it a part of a bench or whatever, why would they be there?
I don't think they are planks. If you look at the height and distance, they'd have to be half way up a bush. The far side of the stream (or whatever the bridge goes over) would be too far away and on a slope. I think the 'planks' are just lines formed by the rag/dress, but the eye tries to see them as horizontal rather than vertical. The perspective is all over the place on this one!If those are planks of wood, be it a part of a bench or whatever, why would they be there?
Good shout and Yes:Sorry if I've forgotten something that may have been posted earlier in the thread, but have witnesses connected the Stone Girl with the local story of 'the lady of Eyeworth Pond'? I think somebody or some people did but I can't remember for definite.