- Joined
- Aug 6, 2005
- Messages
- 723
Dunno if this should be on the cryptozoology page or not, but what the hell...
Anyway, I heard a long time ago (don't know if it was a book, TV show or what) that the reason why there appear to be two varieties of domestic tabby cat - one with a stripy, 'tigerish' pattern to its coat, the other with a more swirly, 'blotchy' style - is because of towns. Yes, towns. And cities.
Quite simply, it comes down to this: That the stripey (and presumably 'original') tabby cat is more suited to a rural environment. The markings add a suitable camouflage, making it much easier for the cat to hunt and evade predators, and thus deeming it 'fit for survival'.
However, the ever-encroaching urban environment has given rise to a recent - and sustaining - mutation: that of the 'blotchy' tabby cat, whose markings, apparently, offer much better camouflage in a built up environment - and offer also a visible affirmation of Darwinism in action.
My question is - is this true? Or is there any evidence that a reasonably large population of blotchy tabby cats existed before, say, the industrial revolution.
And if there isn't any evidence one way or the other, then how did the zoologists/biologists/whatever come to the conclusion that the blotchy tabby cat is the direct result of a recent evolutionary/environmental dynamic when no-one can be sure if both varieties haven't already existed side-by-side for a long time?
Has a comprehensive study of tabby cats ever been undertaken? Do we find, as a proportion of the overall population, more stripy tabby cats out in the country, and more blotchy ones in cities and towns?
I would quite like to know, as I harbour an ambition to do a sculpture of a pope being knocked down by a fallen...blotchy tabby cat.
Anyway, I heard a long time ago (don't know if it was a book, TV show or what) that the reason why there appear to be two varieties of domestic tabby cat - one with a stripy, 'tigerish' pattern to its coat, the other with a more swirly, 'blotchy' style - is because of towns. Yes, towns. And cities.
Quite simply, it comes down to this: That the stripey (and presumably 'original') tabby cat is more suited to a rural environment. The markings add a suitable camouflage, making it much easier for the cat to hunt and evade predators, and thus deeming it 'fit for survival'.
However, the ever-encroaching urban environment has given rise to a recent - and sustaining - mutation: that of the 'blotchy' tabby cat, whose markings, apparently, offer much better camouflage in a built up environment - and offer also a visible affirmation of Darwinism in action.
My question is - is this true? Or is there any evidence that a reasonably large population of blotchy tabby cats existed before, say, the industrial revolution.
And if there isn't any evidence one way or the other, then how did the zoologists/biologists/whatever come to the conclusion that the blotchy tabby cat is the direct result of a recent evolutionary/environmental dynamic when no-one can be sure if both varieties haven't already existed side-by-side for a long time?
Has a comprehensive study of tabby cats ever been undertaken? Do we find, as a proportion of the overall population, more stripy tabby cats out in the country, and more blotchy ones in cities and towns?
I would quite like to know, as I harbour an ambition to do a sculpture of a pope being knocked down by a fallen...blotchy tabby cat.