Letting meat eaters drown is ethical because of the suffering they cause to animals, an Oxford University academic has controversially argued.
Dr Michael Plant, a philosopher focusing on happiness, who eats meat himself, claims that, according to some moral philosophies, it can be justifiable to let people like himself die.
His argument stems from a conflict of what he says are two commonly held beliefs.
The first is human beings have a duty to rescue each other when doing so comes at a trivial cost. For example, jumping into a pond to save a drowning child but ruining your clothes in the process.
The second belief, Dr Plant claims, is it is wrong to eat meat because of the suffering animals can experience in factory farms.
Livestock, like chickens, can often be kept in cramped, dirty conditions before they are slaughtered.
He says this conflict leaves people who subscribe to the second belief in a morally interesting position if they encounter someone who eats meat drowning in a pond, and that allowing them to die might, in fact, be the lesser evil.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11389953/Should-save-dying-stranger-know-eat-MEAT.html
(Bonus points for (reverse?) nominative determinism.
maximus otter